Top JavaScript Icons Libraries

1. A brief overview of feathericons/feather:

   • Feather is a collection of simple, open-source icons designed for web, mobile, and desktop applications.

2. A tiny code example for feathericons/feather:

   <i data-feather="heart"></i>
   <script src="https://unpkg.com/feather-icons"></script>
   <script>
     feather.replace()
   </script>
   

3. Pros of feathericons/feather compared to the other projects:

   • Lightweight and easy to use, with a simple API for integrating the icons.
   • Consistent and visually appealing design across the entire icon set.
   • Actively maintained with regular updates and bug fixes.

4. Cons of feathericons/feather compared to the other projects:

   • Smaller icon set compared to some other icon libraries.
   • Limited customization options for the icons.
   • Requires additional JavaScript to replace the icons on the page.

evil-icons/evil-icons

1. A brief overview of evil-icons/evil-icons:

   • Evil Icons is a set of simple and clean SVG icons for use in web projects.

2. A tiny code example for evil-icons/evil-icons:

   <i data-icon="ei-trophy"></i>
   <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/evil-icons@1.10.1/assets/evil-icons.min.js"></script>
   

3. Pros of evil-icons/evil-icons compared to feathericons/feather:

   • Larger icon set with a wider variety of icons.
   • Provides more customization options for the icons.
   • Supports both JavaScript and CSS-based integration.

4. Cons of evil-icons/evil-icons compared to feathericons/feather:

   • The design of the icons may not be as consistent or visually appealing.
   • The library is not as actively maintained as feathericons/feather.

alexk111/SVG-Morpheus

1. A brief overview of alexk111/SVG-Morpheus:

   • SVG-Morpheus is a JavaScript library that allows you to morph one SVG icon into another.

2. A tiny code example for alexk111/SVG-Morpheus:

   <div id="icon-container">
     <svg id="icon" width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24"></svg>
   </div>
   <script src="https://unpkg.com/svg-morpheus@0.3.2/dist/svg-morpheus.js"></script>
   <script>
     const morpheus = new SVGMorpheus('#icon');
     morpheus.to('menu', 1000);
   </script>
   

3. Pros of alexk111/SVG-Morpheus compared to feathericons/feather:

   • Provides dynamic icon animation and morphing capabilities.
   • Allows for more advanced icon interactions and transitions.
   • Supports a wide range of SVG icon formats.

4. Cons of alexk111/SVG-Morpheus compared to feathericons/feather:

   • Requires more complex integration and setup compared to a simple icon library.
   • May have a larger file size and performance impact due to the animation features.
   • Focuses on icon animation rather than a comprehensive icon set.

Evil Icons is a set of simple and clean SVG icons for your digital products.

Code Example

<i data-feather="heart"></i>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/evil-icons/assets/evil-icons.min.js"></script>
<script>
  evilIcons.load();
</script>

Pros

• Extensive Icon Set: Evil Icons provides a wide range of over 70 high-quality SVG icons, covering a variety of common use cases.
• Lightweight: The library is relatively small in size, making it a good choice for projects with performance constraints.
• Customizable: The icons can be easily customized in terms of color, size, and other visual properties.

Cons

• Limited Functionality: Compared to some other icon libraries, Evil Icons lacks advanced features like animation or integration with popular frameworks.
• Older Project: The project has not been actively maintained since 2017, which may be a concern for some users.
• Fewer Community Resources: Due to its relatively smaller user base, there are fewer community-contributed resources and support available for Evil Icons compared to more popular icon libraries.

1. A library for creating morphing SVG icons.

### Pros

1. Provides a simple and intuitive API for animating SVG icons.
2. Supports a wide range of SVG path data formats.
3. Allows for smooth transitions between different icon states.

### Cons

1. Limited to SVG icons, not supporting other vector formats.
2. Requires manual setup and configuration for each icon.
3. May have performance issues with complex or large SVG icons.

### Comparison

| Project | Overview |
| --- | --- |
| feathericons/feather | A collection of open-source SVG icons. |
| evil-icons/evil-icons | A set of simple, clean, and easy-to-use icons. |
| FortAwesome/vue-fontawesome | A Vue.js component for using Font Awesome icons. |
| webkul/vivid | A library of customizable SVG icons. |

Overall, alexk111/SVG-Morpheus stands out for its focus on animating and morphing SVG icons, while the other projects provide static icon collections or integration with popular icon libraries. The pros and cons of alexk111/SVG-Morpheus highlight its strengths in SVG animation, but also its limitations compared to more comprehensive icon solutions.

1. FortAwesome/vue-fontawesome is a Vue.js component for using Font Awesome icons.

```

3. Pros:

   • Provides a simple and intuitive API for using Font Awesome icons in Vue.js applications.
   • Supports both regular and brand icons from Font Awesome.
   • Offers advanced features like size, spin, and pulse animations.

4. Cons:

   • Requires the use of Font Awesome, which may not be suitable for all projects.
   • May have a larger bundle size compared to some other icon libraries.
   • Doesn't provide the same level of customization as some other icon libraries.

feathericons/feather

1. feathericons/feather is a collection of simple, open-source icons designed as a library for developers.

2. Pros:

   • Provides a clean and minimalist set of icons.
   • Offers a lightweight and fast-loading library.
   • Supports various icon formats, including SVG, font, and React components.

3. Cons:

   • May not have the same level of popularity and community support as some other icon libraries.
   • Doesn't provide the same level of customization as some other icon libraries.
   • May not have as many icon options as some other libraries.

evil-icons/evil-icons

1. evil-icons/evil-icons is a set of simple and clean SVG icons for use in your web projects.

2. Pros:

   • Provides a unique and distinctive set of icons.
   • Offers a lightweight and fast-loading library.
   • Supports various icon formats, including SVG, font, and Rails helpers.

3. Cons:

   • May not have the same level of popularity and community support as some other icon libraries.
   • Doesn't provide the same level of customization as some other icon libraries.
   • May not have as many icon options as some other libraries.

alexk111/SVG-Morpheus

1. alexk111/SVG-Morpheus is a library that allows you to morph one SVG icon into another.

2. Pros:

   • Provides a unique and visually appealing way to transition between icons.
   • Offers a high level of customization and control over the morphing animation.
   • Supports a wide range of SVG icons.

3. Cons:

   • May not be suitable for all projects, as the morphing effect may not be necessary or desired.
   • Requires more complex implementation compared to some other icon libraries.
   • May have a larger bundle size compared to some other icon libraries.

webkul/vivid

1. webkul/vivid is a collection of high-quality, customizable SVG icons for your web projects.

2. Pros:

   • Provides a large and diverse set of icons.
   • Offers a high level of customization, including color, size, and animation.
   • Supports various icon formats, including SVG, font, and React components.

3. Cons:

   • May have a larger bundle size compared to some other icon libraries.
   • May not have the same level of popularity and community support as some other icon libraries.
   • Doesn't provide the same level of simplicity and ease of use as some other icon libraries.

webkul/vivid is a comprehensive icon library that provides a wide range of high-quality, customizable icons.

Code Example

<vivid-icon name="arrow-right" size="24" color="#333"></vivid-icon>

Pros

1. webkul/vivid offers a larger collection of icons compared to the other projects.
2. The icons in webkul/vivid are highly customizable, allowing users to adjust the size, color, and other properties.
3. webkul/vivid provides support for various frontend frameworks, including Vue.js, React, and Angular.

Cons

1. webkul/vivid may have a steeper learning curve compared to some of the other, more focused icon libraries.
2. The library's size and complexity may make it less suitable for projects with specific or limited icon requirements.
3. webkul/vivid may have a larger file size compared to more lightweight icon libraries.

feathericons/feather

feathericons/feather is a collection of simple, open-source icons designed for web, mobile, and desktop applications.

Pros

1. feathericons/feather has a clean and minimalist design aesthetic.
2. The library is lightweight and easy to integrate into projects.
3. feathericons/feather is widely used and well-supported by the open-source community.

Cons

1. The icon collection in feathericons/feather is relatively smaller compared to webkul/vivid.
2. The customization options in feathericons/feather are more limited than those offered by webkul/vivid.
3. feathericons/feather may not provide the same level of support for various frontend frameworks as webkul/vivid.