Top Related Projects
A window.fetch JavaScript polyfill.
A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js
🏊🏾 Simplified HTTP request client.
Quick Overview
JakeChampion/fetch is a lightweight, isomorphic fetch implementation for Node.js and browser environments. It aims to provide a consistent API for making HTTP requests across different JavaScript runtimes, allowing developers to use the same code for both server-side and client-side applications.
Pros
- Isomorphic design, works in both Node.js and browser environments
- Small footprint and minimal dependencies
- Implements the WHATWG Fetch Standard for consistency
- Supports modern features like AbortController for request cancellation
Cons
- May lack some advanced features found in more comprehensive HTTP libraries
- Limited browser support for older versions (IE11 and below not supported)
- Requires polyfills for full functionality in some environments
- Documentation could be more extensive
Code Examples
- Basic GET request:
import fetch from '@jakechampion/fetch';
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
const data = await response.json();
console.log(data);
- POST request with JSON payload:
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/users', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
body: JSON.stringify({ name: 'John Doe', email: 'john@example.com' }),
});
const result = await response.json();
- Using AbortController to cancel a request:
const controller = new AbortController();
const signal = controller.signal;
setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); // Abort after 5 seconds
try {
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/longrunning', { signal });
const data = await response.json();
} catch (error) {
if (error.name === 'AbortError') {
console.log('Request was aborted');
} else {
console.error('Error:', error);
}
}
Getting Started
To use JakeChampion/fetch in your project, follow these steps:
-
Install the package:
npm install @jakechampion/fetch
-
Import and use in your code:
import fetch from '@jakechampion/fetch'; // Make a request const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data'); const data = await response.json();
-
For Node.js environments, you may need to set up global fetch:
import fetch, { Headers, Request, Response } from '@jakechampion/fetch'; if (!globalThis.fetch) { globalThis.fetch = fetch; globalThis.Headers = Headers; globalThis.Request = Request; globalThis.Response = Response; }
Now you can use fetch
in your application, and it will work consistently across different JavaScript environments.
Competitor Comparisons
A window.fetch JavaScript polyfill.
Pros of fetch
- More active development and maintenance
- Better documentation and examples
- Wider browser support
Cons of fetch
- Larger file size
- Potentially more complex API for simple use cases
- May include unnecessary features for some projects
Code Comparison
fetch:
fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
fetch>:
fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
Summary
Both fetch and fetch> are JavaScript libraries for making HTTP requests. fetch is more actively maintained and has better documentation, making it a more reliable choice for most projects. However, fetch> may be suitable for simpler use cases or projects with size constraints. The code usage is identical in this basic example, but fetch likely offers more advanced features and options for complex scenarios.
A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
Pros of node-fetch
- More mature and widely adopted in the Node.js ecosystem
- Extensive documentation and community support
- Supports both Node.js and browser environments
Cons of node-fetch
- Larger package size due to additional features and compatibility
- May have slightly higher memory usage in some scenarios
- Requires polyfills for older Node.js versions
Code Comparison
node-fetch:
import fetch from 'node-fetch';
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
const data = await response.json();
console.log(data);
fetch:
import { fetch } from '@jakechampion/fetch';
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
const data = await response.json();
console.log(data);
Key Differences
- fetch is a lightweight alternative focused on modern Node.js versions
- node-fetch offers broader compatibility and more features
- fetch may have slightly better performance in specific use cases
- node-fetch has a larger ecosystem of plugins and extensions
Use Cases
- Choose node-fetch for projects requiring wide compatibility or extensive features
- Opt for fetch in modern Node.js applications prioritizing simplicity and small package size
Community and Maintenance
- node-fetch has a larger community and more frequent updates
- fetch is maintained by a single developer but offers regular updates
Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
Pros of axios
- More feature-rich with built-in request and response interceptors
- Automatic request and response data transformation (e.g., JSON parsing)
- Wider browser support, including older versions
Cons of axios
- Larger bundle size due to additional features
- Steeper learning curve for beginners compared to fetch's simplicity
- Requires installation as a dependency, unlike fetch which is built into modern browsers
Code comparison
fetch:
fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
axios:
axios.get('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => console.log(response.data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
Summary
fetch is a lightweight, native browser API that provides basic HTTP request functionality. It's simple to use and doesn't require any additional dependencies. However, it lacks some advanced features and may require more manual configuration for complex scenarios.
axios is a more comprehensive HTTP client library that offers additional features like request/response interceptors, automatic data transformation, and broader browser support. It's well-suited for larger projects with complex API interactions but comes with a larger bundle size and a steeper learning curve.
The choice between fetch and axios depends on the specific needs of your project, considering factors such as bundle size, feature requirements, and browser compatibility.
🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js
Pros of got
- More feature-rich with advanced functionality like retries, pagination, and caching
- Better support for streaming and large file downloads
- More actively maintained with frequent updates and bug fixes
Cons of got
- Larger package size and more dependencies
- Steeper learning curve due to more complex API
- Not as lightweight or simple for basic HTTP requests
Code comparison
fetch:
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
const data = await response.json();
got:
const { body } = await got('https://api.example.com/data').json();
fetch is more straightforward for simple requests, while got offers a more concise syntax for common operations like parsing JSON responses.
fetch is a lighter-weight option that closely mirrors the browser's Fetch API, making it easier to use for developers familiar with client-side JavaScript. It's ideal for simple HTTP requests and projects where minimizing dependencies is crucial.
got, on the other hand, provides a more robust set of features and is better suited for complex Node.js applications that require advanced HTTP client capabilities. It offers better performance for certain use cases and more built-in convenience methods.
The choice between fetch and got depends on the specific needs of your project, with fetch being simpler and more lightweight, while got offers more advanced features at the cost of increased complexity.
🏊🏾 Simplified HTTP request client.
Pros of request
- More mature and widely adopted library with extensive documentation
- Supports a broader range of HTTP features and options
- Better handling of complex scenarios like redirects and authentication
Cons of request
- Larger package size and more dependencies
- Not as lightweight or modern as fetch-based alternatives
- Slower performance in some cases due to additional features
Code comparison
request:
const request = require('request');
request('https://api.example.com', (error, response, body) => {
if (!error && response.statusCode == 200) {
console.log(body);
}
});
fetch:
const fetch = require('node-fetch');
fetch('https://api.example.com')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));
Summary
request is a more established and feature-rich library, offering extensive functionality for complex HTTP requests. However, it comes with a larger footprint and may be overkill for simpler use cases. fetch, on the other hand, provides a more modern and lightweight approach, aligning with browser standards and offering better performance for basic HTTP operations. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project, with request being suitable for complex scenarios and fetch for simpler, more streamlined applications.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
window.fetch polyfill
The fetch()
function is a Promise-based mechanism for programmatically making
web requests in the browser. This project is a polyfill that implements a subset
of the standard Fetch specification, enough to make fetch
a viable
replacement for most uses of XMLHttpRequest in traditional web applications.
Table of Contents
Read this first
-
If you believe you found a bug with how
fetch
behaves in your browser, please don't open an issue in this repository unless you are testing in an old version of a browser that doesn't supportwindow.fetch
natively. Make sure you read this entire readme, especially the Caveats section, as there's probably a known work-around for an issue you've found. This project is a polyfill, and since all modern browsers now implement thefetch
function natively, no code from this project actually takes any effect there. See Browser support for detailed information. -
If you have trouble making a request to another domain (a different subdomain or port number also constitutes another domain), please familiarize yourself with all the intricacies and limitations of CORS requests. Because CORS requires participation of the server by implementing specific HTTP response headers, it is often nontrivial to set up or debug. CORS is exclusively handled by the browser's internal mechanisms which this polyfill cannot influence.
-
This project doesn't work under Node.js environments. It's meant for web browsers only. You should ensure that your application doesn't try to package and run this on the server.
-
If you have an idea for a new feature of
fetch
, submit your feature requests to the specification's repository. We only add features and APIs that are part of the Fetch specification.
Installation
npm install whatwg-fetch --save
You will also need a Promise polyfill for older browsers. We recommend taylorhakes/promise-polyfill for its small size and Promises/A+ compatibility.
Usage
Importing
Importing will automatically polyfill window.fetch
and related APIs:
import 'whatwg-fetch'
window.fetch(...)
If for some reason you need to access the polyfill implementation, it is available via exports:
import {fetch as fetchPolyfill} from 'whatwg-fetch'
window.fetch(...) // use native browser version
fetchPolyfill(...) // use polyfill implementation
This approach can be used to, for example, use abort functionality in browsers that implement a native but outdated version of fetch that doesn't support aborting.
For use with webpack, add this package in the entry
configuration option
before your application entry point:
entry: ['whatwg-fetch', ...]
HTML
fetch('/users.html')
.then(function(response) {
return response.text()
}).then(function(body) {
document.body.innerHTML = body
})
JSON
fetch('/users.json')
.then(function(response) {
return response.json()
}).then(function(json) {
console.log('parsed json', json)
}).catch(function(ex) {
console.log('parsing failed', ex)
})
Response metadata
fetch('/users.json').then(function(response) {
console.log(response.headers.get('Content-Type'))
console.log(response.headers.get('Date'))
console.log(response.status)
console.log(response.statusText)
})
Post form
var form = document.querySelector('form')
fetch('/users', {
method: 'POST',
body: new FormData(form)
})
Post JSON
fetch('/users', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({
name: 'Hubot',
login: 'hubot',
})
})
File upload
var input = document.querySelector('input[type="file"]')
var data = new FormData()
data.append('file', input.files[0])
data.append('user', 'hubot')
fetch('/avatars', {
method: 'POST',
body: data
})
Caveats
-
The Promise returned from
fetch()
won't reject on HTTP error status even if the response is an HTTP 404 or 500. Instead, it will resolve normally, and it will only reject on network failure or if anything prevented the request from completing. -
For maximum browser compatibility when it comes to sending & receiving cookies, always supply the
credentials: 'same-origin'
option instead of relying on the default. See Sending cookies. -
Not all Fetch standard options are supported in this polyfill. For instance,
redirect
andcache
directives are ignored. -
keepalive
is not supported because it would involve making a synchronous XHR, which is something this project is not willing to do. See issue #700 for more information.
Handling HTTP error statuses
To have fetch
Promise reject on HTTP error statuses, i.e. on any non-2xx
status, define a custom response handler:
function checkStatus(response) {
if (response.status >= 200 && response.status < 300) {
return response
} else {
var error = new Error(response.statusText)
error.response = response
throw error
}
}
function parseJSON(response) {
return response.json()
}
fetch('/users')
.then(checkStatus)
.then(parseJSON)
.then(function(data) {
console.log('request succeeded with JSON response', data)
}).catch(function(error) {
console.log('request failed', error)
})
Sending cookies
For CORS requests, use credentials: 'include'
to allow sending credentials
to other domains:
fetch('https://example.com:1234/users', {
credentials: 'include'
})
The default value for credentials
is "same-origin".
The default for credentials
wasn't always the same, though. The following
versions of browsers implemented an older version of the fetch specification
where the default was "omit":
- Firefox 39-60
- Chrome 42-67
- Safari 10.1-11.1.2
If you target these browsers, it's advisable to always specify credentials: 'same-origin'
explicitly with all fetch requests instead of relying on the
default:
fetch('/users', {
credentials: 'same-origin'
})
Note: due to limitations of
XMLHttpRequest,
using credentials: 'omit'
is not respected for same domains in browsers where
this polyfill is active. Cookies will always be sent to same domains in older
browsers.
Receiving cookies
As with XMLHttpRequest, the Set-Cookie
response header returned from the
server is a forbidden header name and therefore can't be programmatically
read with response.headers.get()
. Instead, it's the browser's responsibility
to handle new cookies being set (if applicable to the current URL). Unless they
are HTTP-only, new cookies will be available through document.cookie
.
Redirect modes
The Fetch specification defines these values for the redirect
option: "follow"
(the default), "error", and "manual".
Due to limitations of XMLHttpRequest, only the "follow" mode is available in browsers where this polyfill is active.
Obtaining the Response URL
Due to limitations of XMLHttpRequest, the response.url
value might not be
reliable after HTTP redirects on older browsers.
The solution is to configure the server to set the response HTTP header
X-Request-URL
to the current URL after any redirect that might have happened.
It should be safe to set it unconditionally.
# Ruby on Rails controller example
response.headers['X-Request-URL'] = request.url
This server workaround is necessary if you need reliable response.url
in
Firefox < 32, Chrome < 37, Safari, or IE.
Aborting requests
This polyfill supports the abortable fetch API. However, aborting a fetch requires use of two additional DOM APIs: AbortController and AbortSignal. Typically, browsers that do not support fetch will also not support AbortController or AbortSignal. Consequently, you will need to include an additional polyfill for these APIs to abort fetches:
import 'yet-another-abortcontroller-polyfill'
import {fetch} from 'whatwg-fetch'
// use native browser implementation if it supports aborting
const abortableFetch = ('signal' in new Request('')) ? window.fetch : fetch
const controller = new AbortController()
abortableFetch('/avatars', {
signal: controller.signal
}).catch(function(ex) {
if (ex.name === 'AbortError') {
console.log('request aborted')
}
})
// some time later...
controller.abort()
Browser Support
- Chrome
- Firefox
- Safari 6.1+
- Internet Explorer 10+
Note: modern browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari contain native
implementations of window.fetch
, therefore the code from this polyfill doesn't
have any effect on those browsers. If you believe you've encountered an error
with how window.fetch
is implemented in any of these browsers, you should file
an issue with that browser vendor instead of this project.
Top Related Projects
A window.fetch JavaScript polyfill.
A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js
🏊🏾 Simplified HTTP request client.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot