Pros of react-toastify

• More lightweight and focused solely on toast notifications
• Easier to set up and use with less configuration required
• Better documentation and examples

Cons of react-toastify

• Less customizable than reapop
• Fewer built-in animation options
• Limited support for complex notification structures

Code Comparison

reapop:

import { setUpNotifications, notify } from 'reapop'

setUpNotifications({
  defaultProps: { position: 'top-right', dismissible: true }
})

notify('Hello World!', 'success')

react-toastify:

import { ToastContainer, toast } from 'react-toastify'

<ToastContainer position="top-right" autoClose={5000} />

toast.success('Hello World!')

Both libraries offer simple ways to create toast notifications, but react-toastify's API is slightly more concise. reapop requires an initial setup step, while react-toastify can be used immediately after importing. However, reapop's setup allows for more global configuration options.

react-toastify is generally easier to get started with and has a more straightforward API, making it a popular choice for simple notification needs. reapop, on the other hand, offers more advanced features and customization options, which can be beneficial for complex applications with specific notification requirements.

Pros of notistack

• Seamless integration with Material-UI, making it ideal for React projects using this UI library
• Supports stacking multiple notifications with customizable positioning
• Offers a simpler API with less configuration required out of the box

Cons of notistack

• Limited to Material-UI ecosystem, which may not be suitable for all projects
• Fewer customization options compared to reapop's extensive theming capabilities
• Lacks some advanced features like notification groups or custom animations

Code Comparison

notistack:

import { useSnackbar } from 'notistack';

const { enqueueSnackbar } = useSnackbar();
enqueueSnackbar('This is a success message!', { variant: 'success' });

reapop:

import { notify } from 'reapop';

notify('This is a success message!', {
  status: 'success',
  dismissible: true,
  dismissAfter: 3000
});

Both libraries offer straightforward ways to display notifications, but reapop provides more granular control over notification behavior in its basic implementation. notistack's API is more concise, leveraging React hooks for a clean integration within components.

Pros of react-toast-notifications

• Simpler API with fewer configuration options, making it easier to get started
• Lightweight package with minimal dependencies
• Built-in support for custom components, allowing for greater flexibility

Cons of react-toast-notifications

• Less customizable out of the box compared to reapop
• Fewer animation options and less control over positioning
• Limited built-in themes and styling options

Code Comparison

react-toast-notifications:

import { useToasts } from 'react-toast-notifications'

const { addToast } = useToasts()
addToast('This is a toast message', { appearance: 'success' })

reapop:

import { notify } from 'reapop'

notify('This is a toast message', {
  status: 'success',
  position: 'top-right',
  dismissAfter: 3000
})

Both libraries offer straightforward ways to create toast notifications, but reapop provides more configuration options in the notification creation call. react-toast-notifications uses a hook-based approach, while reapop uses a more traditional function call.

react-toast-notifications is a good choice for projects that need a simple, lightweight toast solution with easy customization of components. reapop is better suited for applications requiring more advanced features, extensive customization options, and finer control over notification behavior and appearance.

Pros of react-hot-toast

• Lightweight and minimalistic design, focusing on simplicity
• Customizable toast positioning and animations
• Easy integration with React projects

Cons of react-hot-toast

• Limited built-in notification types compared to reapop
• Fewer advanced features like progress bars or custom actions
• Less flexibility in terms of styling and theming options

Code Comparison

react-hot-toast:

import { toast } from 'react-hot-toast';

toast('Hello World');
toast.success('Successfully created!');
toast.error('This is an error!');

reapop:

import { notify } from 'reapop';

notify('Hello World');
notify('Successfully created!', 'success');
notify('This is an error!', 'error');

Both libraries offer simple APIs for creating notifications, but reapop provides more options for customization and advanced features. react-hot-toast focuses on a streamlined approach with fewer configuration options, making it easier to get started quickly. reapop offers more flexibility in terms of notification types, themes, and advanced features like progress bars and custom actions, but may require more setup and configuration. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project and the level of customization required.

Pros of react-notifications-component

• More customizable appearance with CSS-in-JS styling
• Supports animations and custom transitions
• Offers a wider variety of notification types (e.g., async, custom content)

Cons of react-notifications-component

• Less opinionated design, requiring more setup for basic use cases
• Documentation could be more comprehensive
• Fewer built-in themes compared to reapop

Code Comparison

react-notifications-component:

import { Store } from "react-notifications-component";

Store.addNotification({
  title: "Wonderful!",
  message: "teodosii@react-notifications-component",
  type: "success",
  insert: "top",
  container: "top-right",
  animationIn: ["animate__animated", "animate__fadeIn"],
  animationOut: ["animate__animated", "animate__fadeOut"],
  dismiss: {
    duration: 5000,
    onScreen: true
  }
});

reapop:

import { notify } from 'reapop'

notify('Welcome to reapop!', {
  title: 'Welcome',
  status: 'success',
  dismissible: true,
  dismissAfter: 3000
})

Both libraries offer React-based notification systems, but react-notifications-component provides more flexibility in styling and animation at the cost of a slightly more complex API. reapop, on the other hand, offers a simpler, more opinionated approach that may be quicker to implement for basic use cases.

Pros of sweetalert

• Simpler API and easier to use for basic alert scenarios
• More visually appealing out-of-the-box design
• Smaller bundle size, suitable for lightweight projects

Cons of sweetalert

• Less customizable compared to reapop's extensive options
• Limited to modal-style alerts, while reapop offers various notification types
• Lacks advanced features like notification queuing and positioning

Code Comparison

sweetalert:

swal({
  title: "Good job!",
  text: "You clicked the button!",
  icon: "success",
  button: "Aww yiss!",
});

reapop:

notify({
  title: 'Good job!',
  message: 'You clicked the button!',
  status: 'success',
  dismissible: true,
  dismissAfter: 3000,
  position: 'top-right'
});

Both libraries offer simple ways to create notifications, but reapop provides more configuration options out of the box. sweetalert focuses on modal-style alerts with a straightforward API, while reapop allows for more diverse notification types and placements. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project, with sweetalert being ideal for simple use cases and reapop offering more flexibility for complex notification systems.