Pros of gotop

• Written in Go, potentially offering better performance and lower resource usage
• Supports mouse input for interactive features
• Provides more detailed network and disk I/O information

Cons of gotop

• Less customizable appearance compared to vtop
• May have a steeper learning curve for users familiar with Node.js-based tools
• Lacks some of the visual polish found in vtop's interface

Code Comparison

vtop (JavaScript):

var drawChart = function() {
  var chart = contrib.line({
    style: {
      line: "yellow",
      text: "green",
      baseline: "black"
    },
    xLabelPadding: 3,
    xPadding: 5,
    showLegend: true,
    wholeNumbersOnly: false
  });
  screen.append(chart);
};

gotop (Go):

func (p *Proc) update() error {
    procs, err := process.Processes()
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }
    p.Procs = procs
    p.Sort()
    return nil
}

The code snippets showcase the different languages and approaches used in each project. vtop focuses on creating visual elements using JavaScript, while gotop utilizes Go's system libraries for process management.

Pros of btop

• More comprehensive system monitoring, including CPU, memory, disks, and network
• Highly customizable interface with themes and layout options
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and improvements

Cons of btop

• Higher resource usage due to more extensive features
• Steeper learning curve for configuration and customization
• May be overwhelming for users seeking simple, lightweight monitoring

Code Comparison

vtop:

var draw = function() {
  screen.clearRegion(0, 1, this.width, this.height);
  drawChart();
  drawProcesses();
  screen.render();
}.bind(this);

btop:

void Draw::draw(const bool force) {
    if (not force and not Proc::needs_redraw) return;
    Proc::needs_redraw = false;
    clear();
    for (auto& element : v_elements) element->draw(true);
    refresh();
}

Summary

btop offers a more feature-rich and customizable system monitoring experience compared to vtop. It provides comprehensive information about various system components and allows for extensive customization. However, this comes at the cost of higher resource usage and a steeper learning curve. vtop, on the other hand, is simpler and more lightweight, making it suitable for users who prefer a straightforward monitoring solution. The code comparison highlights the different approaches, with vtop using JavaScript and btop implemented in C++, reflecting their respective design philosophies.

Pros of gtop

• Written in JavaScript, potentially easier for web developers to contribute
• More actively maintained with recent updates
• Supports custom color themes

Cons of gtop

• Larger package size due to dependencies
• May have higher resource usage compared to vtop

Code Comparison

vtop (CoffeeScript):

draw: (data) ->
  @clear()
  @setContent data
  @screen.render()

gtop (JavaScript):

draw(data) {
  this.clear();
  this.setContent(data);
  this.screen.render();
}

Additional Notes

Both vtop and gtop are terminal-based system monitoring tools that provide graphical representations of system resources. vtop is written in CoffeeScript, while gtop is written in JavaScript. gtop offers more customization options and has seen more recent updates, but it may have a larger footprint due to its dependencies. vtop, being older, might be more stable but lacks some modern features. The code structure is similar, with gtop using more contemporary JavaScript syntax. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific needs and preferences for system monitoring tools.

Pros of Glances

• More comprehensive system monitoring, including network, disk I/O, and processes
• Cross-platform support (Linux, macOS, Windows)
• Web-based interface option for remote monitoring

Cons of Glances

• More complex setup and configuration
• Heavier resource usage due to its extensive feature set

Code Comparison

vtop:

var draw = function() {
  screen.clearRegion(0, 1, this.width, this.height - 2);
  drawChart();
  drawProcesses();
  screen.render();
};

Glances:

def update(self):
    self.stats.update()
    self.refresh_time = time.time() - self.timer
    self.timer = time.time()
    return self.refresh_time

Summary

Glances offers a more feature-rich system monitoring experience with cross-platform support and remote monitoring capabilities. However, it comes at the cost of increased complexity and resource usage. vtop, on the other hand, provides a simpler, lightweight alternative focused on CPU and memory monitoring with an attractive console-based interface. The choice between the two depends on the user's specific monitoring needs and system resources.

Pros of s-tui

• Written in Python, making it more accessible for contributions and modifications
• Offers a stress test feature to evaluate system performance under load
• Provides more detailed sensor information, including fan speeds and power consumption

Cons of s-tui

• Less visually appealing interface compared to vtop's sleek design
• Lacks process management features like sorting and filtering

Code Comparison

vtop (JavaScript):

var drawChart = function(chart, data) {
  var chartLines = chart.getLines();
  chartLines[0].setData(data);
  screen.render();
};

s-tui (Python):

def refresh_sudo(self):
    if not self.sudo_password:
        self.sudo_password = self.get_sudo_password()
    self.refresh()

Both projects aim to provide system monitoring capabilities through terminal-based interfaces. vtop focuses on a more visually appealing design with process management features, while s-tui offers more detailed hardware information and stress testing capabilities. vtop is written in JavaScript, making it potentially faster but less accessible for modifications, whereas s-tui's Python codebase allows for easier contributions and customization.