RxJava
RxJava – Reactive Extensions for the JVM – a library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs using observable sequences for the Java VM.
Top Related Projects
RxJava bindings for Kotlin
Reactive Programming in Swift
A reactive programming library for JavaScript
An extensive tutorial on RxJava
Quick Overview
RxJava is a Java implementation of ReactiveX, a library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs using observable sequences. It extends the observer pattern to support sequences of data/events and adds operators that allow you to compose sequences together declaratively while abstracting away concerns about low-level threading, synchronization, thread-safety, and concurrent data structures.
Pros
- Powerful and flexible API for handling asynchronous operations and event streams
- Extensive set of operators for transforming, combining, and manipulating observables
- Excellent for managing complex asynchronous workflows and reactive programming
- Supports backpressure, allowing for efficient handling of fast producers and slow consumers
Cons
- Steep learning curve, especially for developers new to reactive programming
- Can lead to complex and hard-to-read code if not used carefully
- Potential for memory leaks if subscriptions are not properly managed
- Debugging can be challenging due to the asynchronous nature of operations
Code Examples
- Creating and subscribing to an Observable:
Observable<String> observable = Observable.just("Hello", "RxJava");
observable.subscribe(s -> System.out.println(s));
- Transforming data with operators:
Observable.range(1, 5)
.map(i -> i * 2)
.filter(i -> i > 5)
.subscribe(System.out::println);
- Combining multiple Observables:
Observable<String> obs1 = Observable.just("A", "B", "C");
Observable<String> obs2 = Observable.just("X", "Y", "Z");
Observable.zip(obs1, obs2, (s1, s2) -> s1 + s2)
.subscribe(System.out::println);
- Handling errors:
Observable.create(emitter -> {
try {
emitter.onNext("Doing work");
throw new RuntimeException("Error occurred");
} catch (Exception e) {
emitter.onError(e);
}
})
.subscribe(
System.out::println,
error -> System.err.println("Error: " + error.getMessage())
);
Getting Started
To use RxJava in your project, add the following dependency to your build file:
For Gradle:
implementation 'io.reactivex.rxjava3:rxjava:3.1.5'
For Maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>io.reactivex.rxjava3</groupId>
<artifactId>rxjava</artifactId>
<version>3.1.5</version>
</dependency>
Then, import the necessary classes in your Java file:
import io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Observable;
import io.reactivex.rxjava3.schedulers.Schedulers;
Now you can start using RxJava in your code!
Competitor Comparisons
RxJava bindings for Kotlin
Pros of RxKotlin
- Native Kotlin support with idiomatic syntax and language features
- Smaller codebase, easier to maintain and contribute to
- Leverages Kotlin's null safety and functional programming capabilities
Cons of RxKotlin
- Smaller community and ecosystem compared to RxJava
- Fewer third-party libraries and extensions available
- May have slightly less comprehensive documentation
Code Comparison
RxJava:
Observable.just("Hello", "World")
.map(String::toUpperCase)
.subscribe(System.out::println);
RxKotlin:
Observable.just("Hello", "World")
.map { it.toUpperCase() }
.subscribe { println(it) }
Both RxJava and RxKotlin are part of the ReactiveX family, implementing reactive programming concepts for the JVM. RxKotlin is essentially a Kotlin-specific wrapper around RxJava, providing a more idiomatic API for Kotlin developers.
While RxJava has a larger user base and more extensive ecosystem, RxKotlin offers a more concise and Kotlin-friendly syntax. RxKotlin leverages Kotlin's language features, such as extension functions and lambda expressions, to provide a smoother development experience for Kotlin projects.
Ultimately, the choice between RxJava and RxKotlin depends on the project's primary language and the team's preferences. For pure Kotlin projects, RxKotlin may offer a more natural fit, while RxJava remains the go-to choice for Java-based applications or mixed-language projects.
Reactive Programming in Swift
Pros of RxSwift
- Native Swift implementation, offering better performance and language-specific optimizations
- Seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem and frameworks (e.g., Combine)
- More idiomatic Swift syntax and conventions
Cons of RxSwift
- Smaller community and ecosystem compared to RxJava
- Less extensive documentation and learning resources
- Limited to iOS and macOS development
Code Comparison
RxSwift:
Observable.from([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])
.filter { $0 % 2 == 0 }
.map { $0 * 2 }
.subscribe(onNext: { print($0) })
RxJava:
Observable.fromArray(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
.filter(x -> x % 2 == 0)
.map(x -> x * 2)
.subscribe(System.out::println);
Both examples demonstrate similar functionality, but RxSwift uses Swift's closure syntax and type inference, while RxJava uses Java's lambda expressions and method references. The core concepts remain consistent across both implementations, showcasing the ReactiveX paradigm's cross-platform nature.
A reactive programming library for JavaScript
Pros of rxjs
- Designed specifically for JavaScript and TypeScript, offering better integration with web development ecosystems
- Supports a wider range of operators and utilities tailored for asynchronous programming in web environments
- Smaller bundle size, which is crucial for web applications
Cons of rxjs
- Less performant in high-throughput scenarios compared to RxJava
- Limited support for backpressure handling, which RxJava excels at
- Steeper learning curve for developers not familiar with functional reactive programming concepts
Code Comparison
rxjs:
import { of } from 'rxjs';
import { map, filter } from 'rxjs/operators';
of(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
.pipe(
filter(n => n % 2 === 0),
map(n => n * 2)
)
.subscribe(console.log);
RxJava:
import io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Observable;
Observable.range(1, 5)
.filter(n -> n % 2 == 0)
.map(n -> n * 2)
.subscribe(System.out::println);
Both rxjs and RxJava are powerful reactive programming libraries, but they cater to different ecosystems. rxjs is more suitable for web development, while RxJava is better for Java-based applications, especially those requiring high performance and advanced backpressure handling.
An extensive tutorial on RxJava
Pros of Intro-To-RxJava
- Focused on educational content, providing a comprehensive introduction to RxJava concepts
- Includes detailed explanations and examples, making it easier for beginners to understand
- Structured as a tutorial, guiding users through RxJava step-by-step
Cons of Intro-To-RxJava
- Not actively maintained, with the last update several years ago
- Limited to introductory content, lacking advanced topics and recent RxJava features
- Smaller community and fewer contributors compared to the official RxJava repository
Code Comparison
RxJava (official):
Observable.just(1, 2, 3)
.map(i -> i * 2)
.subscribe(System.out::println);
Intro-To-RxJava:
Observable<Integer> observable = Observable.create(subscriber -> {
subscriber.onNext(1);
subscriber.onNext(2);
subscriber.onNext(3);
subscriber.onCompleted();
});
The official RxJava repository focuses on providing the core library implementation, while Intro-To-RxJava emphasizes explanations and examples for learning purposes. RxJava offers more up-to-date features and active development, whereas Intro-To-RxJava serves as a valuable resource for beginners looking to understand RxJava concepts in a structured manner. However, users should be aware that Intro-To-RxJava may not cover the latest RxJava developments due to its less frequent updates.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
RxJava: Reactive Extensions for the JVM
RxJava is a Java VM implementation of Reactive Extensions: a library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences.
It extends the observer pattern to support sequences of data/events and adds operators that allow you to compose sequences together declaratively while abstracting away concerns about things like low-level threading, synchronization, thread-safety and concurrent data structures.
Version 3.x (Javadoc)
- Single dependency: Reactive-Streams.
- Java 8+ or Android API 21+ required.
- Java 8 lambda-friendly API.
- Android desugar friendly.
- Fixed API mistakes and many limits of RxJava 2.
- Intended to be a replacement for RxJava 2 with relatively few binary incompatible changes.
- Non-opinionated about the source of concurrency (threads, pools, event loops, fibers, actors, etc.).
- Async or synchronous execution.
- Virtual time and schedulers for parameterized concurrency.
- Test and diagnostic support via test schedulers, test consumers and plugin hooks.
- Interop with newer JDK versions via 3rd party libraries, such as
Learn more about RxJava in general on the Wiki Home.
:information_source: Please read the What's different in 3.0 for details on the changes and migration information when upgrading from 2.x.
Version 2.x
The 2.x version is end-of-life as of February 28, 2021. No further development, support, maintenance, PRs and updates will happen. The Javadoc of the very last version, 2.2.21, will remain accessible.
Version 1.x
The 1.x version is end-of-life as of March 31, 2018. No further development, support, maintenance, PRs and updates will happen. The Javadoc of the very last version, 1.3.8, will remain accessible.
Getting started
Setting up the dependency
The first step is to include RxJava 3 into your project, for example, as a Gradle compile dependency:
implementation "io.reactivex.rxjava3:rxjava:3.x.y"
(Please replace x
and y
with the latest version numbers:
)
Hello World
The second is to write the Hello World program:
package rxjava.examples;
import io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.*;
public class HelloWorld {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Flowable.just("Hello world").subscribe(System.out::println);
}
}
Note that RxJava 3 components now live under io.reactivex.rxjava3
and the base classes and interfaces live under io.reactivex.rxjava3.core
.
Base classes
RxJava 3 features several base classes you can discover operators on:
io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Flowable
: 0..N flows, supporting Reactive-Streams and backpressureio.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Observable
: 0..N flows, no backpressure,io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Single
: a flow of exactly 1 item or an error,io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Completable
: a flow without items but only a completion or error signal,io.reactivex.rxjava3.core.Maybe
: a flow with no items, exactly one item or an error.
Some terminology
Upstream, downstream
The dataflows in RxJava consist of a source, zero or more intermediate steps followed by a data consumer or combinator step (where the step is responsible to consume the dataflow by some means):
source.operator1().operator2().operator3().subscribe(consumer);
source.flatMap(value -> source.operator1().operator2().operator3());
Here, if we imagine ourselves on operator2
, looking to the left towards the source is called the upstream. Looking to the right towards the subscriber/consumer is called the downstream. This is often more apparent when each element is written on a separate line:
source
.operator1()
.operator2()
.operator3()
.subscribe(consumer)
Objects in motion
In RxJava's documentation, emission, emits, item, event, signal, data and message are considered synonyms and represent the object traveling along the dataflow.
Backpressure
When the dataflow runs through asynchronous steps, each step may perform different things with different speed. To avoid overwhelming such steps, which usually would manifest itself as increased memory usage due to temporary buffering or the need for skipping/dropping data, so-called backpressure is applied, which is a form of flow control where the steps can express how many items are they ready to process. This allows constraining the memory usage of the dataflows in situations where there is generally no way for a step to know how many items the upstream will send to it.
In RxJava, the dedicated Flowable
class is designated to support backpressure and Observable
is dedicated to the non-backpressured operations (short sequences, GUI interactions, etc.). The other types, Single
, Maybe
and Completable
don't support backpressure nor should they; there is always room to store one item temporarily.
Assembly time
The preparation of dataflows by applying various intermediate operators happens in the so-called assembly time:
Flowable<Integer> flow = Flowable.range(1, 5)
.map(v -> v * v)
.filter(v -> v % 3 == 0)
;
At this point, the data is not flowing yet and no side-effects are happening.
Subscription time
This is a temporary state when subscribe()
is called on a flow that establishes the chain of processing steps internally:
flow.subscribe(System.out::println)
This is when the subscription side-effects are triggered (see doOnSubscribe
). Some sources block or start emitting items right away in this state.
Runtime
This is the state when the flows are actively emitting items, errors or completion signals:
Observable.create(emitter -> {
while (!emitter.isDisposed()) {
long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
emitter.onNext(time);
if (time % 2 != 0) {
emitter.onError(new IllegalStateException("Odd millisecond!"));
break;
}
}
})
.subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);
Practically, this is when the body of the given example above executes.
Simple background computation
One of the common use cases for RxJava is to run some computation, network request on a background thread and show the results (or error) on the UI thread:
import io.reactivex.rxjava3.schedulers.Schedulers;
Flowable.fromCallable(() -> {
Thread.sleep(1000); // imitate expensive computation
return "Done";
})
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
.observeOn(Schedulers.single())
.subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);
Thread.sleep(2000); // <--- wait for the flow to finish
This style of chaining methods is called a fluent API which resembles the builder pattern. However, RxJava's reactive types are immutable; each of the method calls returns a new Flowable
with added behavior. To illustrate, the example can be rewritten as follows:
Flowable<String> source = Flowable.fromCallable(() -> {
Thread.sleep(1000); // imitate expensive computation
return "Done";
});
Flowable<String> runBackground = source.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io());
Flowable<String> showForeground = runBackground.observeOn(Schedulers.single());
showForeground.subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);
Thread.sleep(2000);
Typically, you can move computations or blocking IO to some other thread via subscribeOn
. Once the data is ready, you can make sure they get processed on the foreground or GUI thread via observeOn
.
Schedulers
RxJava operators don't work with Thread
s or ExecutorService
s directly but with so-called Scheduler
s that abstract away sources of concurrency behind a uniform API. RxJava 3 features several standard schedulers accessible via Schedulers
utility class.
Schedulers.computation()
: Run computation intensive work on a fixed number of dedicated threads in the background. Most asynchronous operators use this as their defaultScheduler
.Schedulers.io()
: Run I/O-like or blocking operations on a dynamically changing set of threads.Schedulers.single()
: Run work on a single thread in a sequential and FIFO manner.Schedulers.trampoline()
: Run work in a sequential and FIFO manner in one of the participating threads, usually for testing purposes.
These are available on all JVM platforms but some specific platforms, such as Android, have their own typical Scheduler
s defined: AndroidSchedulers.mainThread()
, SwingScheduler.instance()
or JavaFXScheduler.platform()
.
In addition, there is an option to wrap an existing Executor
(and its subtypes such as ExecutorService
) into a Scheduler
via Schedulers.from(Executor)
. This can be used, for example, to have a larger but still fixed pool of threads (unlike computation()
and io()
respectively).
The Thread.sleep(2000);
at the end is no accident. In RxJava the default Scheduler
s run on daemon threads, which means once the Java main thread exits, they all get stopped and background computations may never happen. Sleeping for some time in this example situations lets you see the output of the flow on the console with time to spare.
Concurrency within a flow
Flows in RxJava are sequential in nature split into processing stages that may run concurrently with each other:
Flowable.range(1, 10)
.observeOn(Schedulers.computation())
.map(v -> v * v)
.blockingSubscribe(System.out::println);
This example flow squares the numbers from 1 to 10 on the computation Scheduler
and consumes the results on the "main" thread (more precisely, the caller thread of blockingSubscribe
). However, the lambda v -> v * v
doesn't run in parallel for this flow; it receives the values 1 to 10 on the same computation thread one after the other.
Parallel processing
Processing the numbers 1 to 10 in parallel is a bit more involved:
Flowable.range(1, 10)
.flatMap(v ->
Flowable.just(v)
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.computation())
.map(w -> w * w)
)
.blockingSubscribe(System.out::println);
Practically, parallelism in RxJava means running independent flows and merging their results back into a single flow. The operator flatMap
does this by first mapping each number from 1 to 10 into its own individual Flowable
, runs them and merges the computed squares.
Note, however, that flatMap
doesn't guarantee any order and the items from the inner flows may end up interleaved. There are alternative operators:
concatMap
that maps and runs one inner flow at a time andconcatMapEager
which runs all inner flows "at once" but the output flow will be in the order those inner flows were created.
Alternatively, the Flowable.parallel()
operator and the ParallelFlowable
type help achieve the same parallel processing pattern:
Flowable.range(1, 10)
.parallel()
.runOn(Schedulers.computation())
.map(v -> v * v)
.sequential()
.blockingSubscribe(System.out::println);
Dependent sub-flows
flatMap
is a powerful operator and helps in a lot of situations. For example, given a service that returns a Flowable
, we'd like to call another service with values emitted by the first service:
Flowable<Inventory> inventorySource = warehouse.getInventoryAsync();
inventorySource
.flatMap(inventoryItem -> erp.getDemandAsync(inventoryItem.getId())
.map(demand -> "Item " + inventoryItem.getName() + " has demand " + demand))
.subscribe(System.out::println);
Continuations
Sometimes, when an item has become available, one would like to perform some dependent computations on it. This is sometimes called continuations and, depending on what should happen and what types are involved, may involve various operators to accomplish.
Dependent
The most typical scenario is to given a value, invoke another service, await and continue with its result:
service.apiCall()
.flatMap(value -> service.anotherApiCall(value))
.flatMap(next -> service.finalCall(next))
It is often the case also that later sequences would require values from earlier mappings. This can be achieved by moving the outer flatMap
into the inner parts of the previous flatMap
for example:
service.apiCall()
.flatMap(value ->
service.anotherApiCall(value)
.flatMap(next -> service.finalCallBoth(value, next))
)
Here, the original value
will be available inside the inner flatMap
, courtesy of lambda variable capture.
Non-dependent
In other scenarios, the result(s) of the first source/dataflow is irrelevant and one would like to continue with a quasi independent another source. Here, flatMap
works as well:
Observable continued = sourceObservable.flatMapSingle(ignored -> someSingleSource)
continued.map(v -> v.toString())
.subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);
however, the continuation in this case stays Observable
instead of the likely more appropriate Single
. (This is understandable because
from the perspective of flatMapSingle
, sourceObservable
is a multi-valued source and thus the mapping may result in multiple values as well).
Often though there is a way that is somewhat more expressive (and also lower overhead) by using Completable
as the mediator and its operator andThen
to resume with something else:
sourceObservable
.ignoreElements() // returns Completable
.andThen(someSingleSource)
.map(v -> v.toString())
The only dependency between the sourceObservable
and the someSingleSource
is that the former should complete normally in order for the latter to be consumed.
Deferred-dependent
Sometimes, there is an implicit data dependency between the previous sequence and the new sequence that, for some reason, was not flowing through the "regular channels". One would be inclined to write such continuations as follows:
AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger();
Observable.range(1, 10)
.doOnNext(ignored -> count.incrementAndGet())
.ignoreElements()
.andThen(Single.just(count.get()))
.subscribe(System.out::println);
Unfortunately, this prints 0
because Single.just(count.get())
is evaluated at assembly time when the dataflow hasn't even run yet. We need something that defers the evaluation of this Single
source until runtime when the main source completes:
AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger();
Observable.range(1, 10)
.doOnNext(ignored -> count.incrementAndGet())
.ignoreElements()
.andThen(Single.defer(() -> Single.just(count.get())))
.subscribe(System.out::println);
or
AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger();
Observable.range(1, 10)
.doOnNext(ignored -> count.incrementAndGet())
.ignoreElements()
.andThen(Single.fromCallable(() -> count.get()))
.subscribe(System.out::println);
Type conversions
Sometimes, a source or service returns a different type than the flow that is supposed to work with it. For example, in the inventory example above, getDemandAsync
could return a Single<DemandRecord>
. If the code example is left unchanged, this will result in a compile-time error (however, often with a misleading error message about lack of overload).
In such situations, there are usually two options to fix the transformation: 1) convert to the desired type or 2) find and use an overload of the specific operator supporting the different type.
Converting to the desired type
Each reactive base class features operators that can perform such conversions, including the protocol conversions, to match some other type. The following matrix shows the available conversion options:
Flowable | Observable | Single | Maybe | Completable | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flowable | toObservable | first , firstOrError , single , singleOrError , last , lastOrError 1 | firstElement , singleElement , lastElement | ignoreElements | |
Observable | toFlowable 2 | first , firstOrError , single , singleOrError , last , lastOrError 1 | firstElement , singleElement , lastElement | ignoreElements | |
Single | toFlowable 3 | toObservable | toMaybe | ignoreElement | |
Maybe | toFlowable 3 | toObservable | toSingle | ignoreElement | |
Completable | toFlowable | toObservable | toSingle | toMaybe |
1: When turning a multi-valued source into a single-valued source, one should decide which of the many source values should be considered as the result.
2: Turning an Observable
into Flowable
requires an additional decision: what to do with the potential unconstrained flow
of the source Observable
? There are several strategies available (such as buffering, dropping, keeping the latest) via the BackpressureStrategy
parameter or via standard Flowable
operators such as onBackpressureBuffer
, onBackpressureDrop
, onBackpressureLatest
which also
allow further customization of the backpressure behavior.
3: When there is only (at most) one source item, there is no problem with backpressure as it can be always stored until the downstream is ready to consume.
Using an overload with the desired type
Many frequently used operator has overloads that can deal with the other types. These are usually named with the suffix of the target type:
Operator | Overloads |
---|---|
flatMap | flatMapSingle , flatMapMaybe , flatMapCompletable , flatMapIterable |
concatMap | concatMapSingle , concatMapMaybe , concatMapCompletable , concatMapIterable |
switchMap | switchMapSingle , switchMapMaybe , switchMapCompletable |
The reason these operators have a suffix instead of simply having the same name with different signature is type erasure. Java doesn't consider signatures such as operator(Function<T, Single<R>>)
and operator(Function<T, Maybe<R>>)
different (unlike C#) and due to erasure, the two operator
s would end up as duplicate methods with the same signature.
Operator naming conventions
Naming in programming is one of the hardest things as names are expected to be not long, expressive, capturing and easily memorable. Unfortunately, the target language (and pre-existing conventions) may not give too much help in this regard (unusable keywords, type erasure, type ambiguities, etc.).
Unusable keywords
In the original Rx.NET, the operator that emits a single item and then completes is called Return(T)
. Since the Java convention is to have a lowercase letter start a method name, this would have been return(T)
which is a keyword in Java and thus not available. Therefore, RxJava chose to name this operator just(T)
. The same limitation exists for the operator Switch
, which had to be named switchOnNext
. Yet another example is Catch
which was named onErrorResumeNext
.
Type erasure
Many operators that expect the user to provide some function returning a reactive type can't be overloaded because the type erasure around a Function<T, X>
turns such method signatures into duplicates. RxJava chose to name such operators by appending the type as suffix as well:
Flowable<R> flatMap(Function<? super T, ? extends Publisher<? extends R>> mapper)
Flowable<R> flatMapMaybe(Function<? super T, ? extends MaybeSource<? extends R>> mapper)
Type ambiguities
Even though certain operators have no problems from type erasure, their signature may turn up being ambiguous, especially if one uses Java 8 and lambdas. For example, there are several overloads of concatWith
taking the various other reactive base types as arguments (for providing convenience and performance benefits in the underlying implementation):
Flowable<T> concatWith(Publisher<? extends T> other);
Flowable<T> concatWith(SingleSource<? extends T> other);
Both Publisher
and SingleSource
appear as functional interfaces (types with one abstract method) and may encourage users to try to provide a lambda expression:
someSource.concatWith(s -> Single.just(2))
.subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);
Unfortunately, this approach doesn't work and the example does not print 2
at all. In fact, since version 2.1.10, it doesn't
even compile because at least 4 concatWith
overloads exist and the compiler finds the code above ambiguous.
The user in such situations probably wanted to defer some computation until the someSource
has completed, thus the correct
unambiguous operator should have been defer
:
someSource.concatWith(Single.defer(() -> Single.just(2)))
.subscribe(System.out::println, Throwable::printStackTrace);
Sometimes, a suffix is added to avoid logical ambiguities that may compile but produce the wrong type in a flow:
Flowable<T> merge(Publisher<? extends Publisher<? extends T>> sources);
Flowable<T> mergeArray(Publisher<? extends T>... sources);
This can get also ambiguous when functional interface types get involved as the type argument T
.
Error handling
Dataflows can fail, at which point the error is emitted to the consumer(s). Sometimes though, multiple sources may fail at which point there is a choice whether or not wait for all of them to complete or fail. To indicate this opportunity, many operator names are suffixed with the DelayError
words (while others feature a delayError
or delayErrors
boolean flag in one of their overloads):
Flowable<T> concat(Publisher<? extends Publisher<? extends T>> sources);
Flowable<T> concatDelayError(Publisher<? extends Publisher<? extends T>> sources);
Of course, suffixes of various kinds may appear together:
Flowable<T> concatArrayEagerDelayError(Publisher<? extends T>... sources);
Base class vs base type
The base classes can be considered heavy due to the sheer number of static and instance methods on them. RxJava 3's design was heavily influenced by the Reactive Streams specification, therefore, the library features a class and an interface per each reactive type:
Type | Class | Interface | Consumer |
---|---|---|---|
0..N backpressured | Flowable | Publisher 1 | Subscriber |
0..N unbounded | Observable | ObservableSource 2 | Observer |
1 element or error | Single | SingleSource | SingleObserver |
0..1 element or error | Maybe | MaybeSource | MaybeObserver |
0 element or error | Completable | CompletableSource | CompletableObserver |
1The org.reactivestreams.Publisher
is part of the external Reactive Streams library. It is the main type to interact with other reactive libraries through a standardized mechanism governed by the Reactive Streams specification.
2The naming convention of the interface was to append Source
to the semi-traditional class name. There is no FlowableSource
since Publisher
is provided by the Reactive Streams library (and subtyping it wouldn't have helped with interoperation either). These interfaces are, however, not standard in the sense of the Reactive Streams specification and are currently RxJava specific only.
R8 and ProGuard settings
By default, RxJava itself doesn't require any ProGuard/R8 settings and should work without problems. Unfortunately, the Reactive Streams dependency since version 1.0.3 has embedded Java 9 class files in its JAR that can cause warnings with the plain ProGuard:
Warning: org.reactivestreams.FlowAdapters$FlowPublisherFromReactive: can't find superclass or interface java.util.concurrent.Flow$Publisher
Warning: org.reactivestreams.FlowAdapters$FlowToReactiveProcessor: can't find superclass or interface java.util.concurrent.Flow$Processor
Warning: org.reactivestreams.FlowAdapters$FlowToReactiveSubscriber: can't find superclass or interface java.util.concurrent.Flow$Subscriber
Warning: org.reactivestreams.FlowAdapters$FlowToReactiveSubscription: can't find superclass or interface java.util.concurrent.Flow$Subscription
Warning: org.reactivestreams.FlowAdapters: can't find referenced class java.util.concurrent.Flow$Publisher
It is recommended one sets up the following -dontwarn
entry in the application's proguard-ruleset
file:
-dontwarn java.util.concurrent.Flow*
For R8, the RxJava jar includes the META-INF/proguard/rxjava3.pro
with the same no-warning clause and should apply automatically.
Further reading
For further details, consult the wiki.
Communication
Versioning
Version 3.x is in development. Bugfixes will be applied to both 2.x and 3.x branches, but new features will only be added to 3.x.
Minor 3.x increments (such as 3.1, 3.2, etc) will occur when non-trivial new functionality is added or significant enhancements or bug fixes occur that may have behavioral changes that may affect some edge cases (such as dependence on behavior resulting from a bug). An example of an enhancement that would classify as this is adding reactive pull backpressure support to an operator that previously did not support it. This should be backwards compatible but does behave differently.
Patch 3.x.y increments (such as 3.0.0 -> 3.0.1, 3.3.1 -> 3.3.2, etc) will occur for bug fixes and trivial functionality (like adding a method overload). New functionality marked with an @Beta
or @Experimental
annotation can also be added in the patch releases to allow rapid exploration and iteration of unstable new functionality.
@Beta
APIs marked with the @Beta
annotation at the class or method level are subject to change. They can be modified in any way, or even removed, at any time. If your code is a library itself (i.e. it is used on the CLASSPATH of users outside your control), you should not use beta APIs, unless you repackage them (e.g. using ProGuard, shading, etc).
@Experimental
APIs marked with the @Experimental
annotation at the class or method level will almost certainly change. They can be modified in any way, or even removed, at any time. You should not use or rely on them in any production code. They are purely to allow broad testing and feedback.
@Deprecated
APIs marked with the @Deprecated
annotation at the class or method level will remain supported until the next major release, but it is recommended to stop using them.
io.reactivex.rxjava3.internal.*
All code inside the io.reactivex.rxjava3.internal.*
packages are considered private API and should not be relied upon at all. It can change at any time.
Full Documentation
- Wiki
- Javadoc
- Latest snaphot Javadoc
- Javadoc of a specific release version:
http://reactivex.io/RxJava/3.x/javadoc/3.x.y/
Binaries
Binaries and dependency information for Maven, Ivy, Gradle and others can be found at http://search.maven.org.
Example for Gradle:
implementation 'io.reactivex.rxjava3:rxjava:x.y.z'
and for Maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>io.reactivex.rxjava3</groupId>
<artifactId>rxjava</artifactId>
<version>x.y.z</version>
</dependency>
and for Ivy:
<dependency org="io.reactivex.rxjava3" name="rxjava" rev="x.y.z" />
Snapshots
Snapshots after May 1st, 2021 are available via https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/io/reactivex/rxjava3/rxjava/
repositories {
maven { url 'https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots' }
}
dependencies {
implementation 'io.reactivex.rxjava3:rxjava:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT'
}
JavaDoc snapshots are available at http://reactivex.io/RxJava/3.x/javadoc/snapshot
Build
To build:
$ git clone git@github.com:ReactiveX/RxJava.git
$ cd RxJava/
$ ./gradlew build
Further details on building can be found on the Getting Started page of the wiki.
Bugs and Feedback
For bugs, questions and discussions please use the Github Issues.
LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2016-present, RxJava Contributors.
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Top Related Projects
RxJava bindings for Kotlin
Reactive Programming in Swift
A reactive programming library for JavaScript
An extensive tutorial on RxJava
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot