squidex

Headless CMS and Content Managment Hub

2,252

451

2,252

View on GitHub

Top Related Projects

graphql-platform

5,135

Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.

directus

27,495

The flexible backend for all your projects 🐰 Turn your DB into a headless CMS, admin panels, or apps with a custom UI, instant APIs, auth & more.

strapi

63,346

🚀 Strapi is the leading open-source headless CMS. It’s 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, fully customizable, and developer-first.

keystone

9,208

The superpowered headless CMS for Node.js — built with GraphQL and React

cms

3,260

Build bespoke content experiences with Craft.

Quick Overview

Squidex is an open-source headless CMS and content management hub built with ASP.NET Core and Angular. It provides a flexible and scalable solution for managing content across various platforms and devices, offering a powerful API for developers and an intuitive interface for content creators.

Pros

Highly customizable and extensible architecture
Supports multiple languages and localization
Offers a GraphQL API in addition to RESTful APIs
Includes built-in asset management and versioning

Cons

Steeper learning curve compared to traditional CMSs
Limited themes and templates available out-of-the-box
Requires technical expertise for setup and customization
Smaller community compared to more established CMS solutions

Getting Started

To get started with Squidex, follow these steps:

Install Docker on your machine
Run the following command to start Squidex:

docker run -d -p 80:80 --name squidex \
    -e URLS__BASEURL=http://localhost \
    -e EVENTSTORE__MONGODB__CONFIGURATION="mongodb://mongo" \
    -e STORE__MONGODB__CONFIGURATION="mongodb://mongo" \
    -e IDENTITY__ADMINEMAIL="admin@squidex.io" \
    -e IDENTITY__ADMINPASSWORD="<your-password>" \
    squidex/squidex

Access the Squidex dashboard at http://localhost
Log in with the admin email and password you set in the Docker command

For more detailed instructions and advanced configuration options, refer to the official Squidex documentation.

Competitor Comparisons

graphql-platform

5,135

Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.

Pros of graphql-platform

Focused on GraphQL implementation, providing a comprehensive solution for building GraphQL APIs in .NET
Offers code-first approach, allowing developers to define schemas using C# classes
Includes built-in support for real-time subscriptions and data loaders

Cons of graphql-platform

Steeper learning curve for developers new to GraphQL concepts
Less suitable for content management scenarios compared to Squidex's headless CMS approach
May require additional setup for features like content versioning and localization

Code Comparison

graphql-platform:

public class Query
{
    public Book GetBook() =>
        new Book { Title = "C# in depth", Author = "Jon Skeet" };
}

Squidex:

[RuleAction]
public sealed class CustomAction : RuleAction
{
    public override Task ExecuteAsync(IRuleEventContext context)
    {
        // Custom action logic
    }
}

While graphql-platform focuses on defining GraphQL schemas and resolvers, Squidex provides a more content-centric approach with features like custom rule actions for content management workflows.

directus

27,495

The flexible backend for all your projects 🐰 Turn your DB into a headless CMS, admin panels, or apps with a custom UI, instant APIs, auth & more.

Pros of Directus

More flexible data modeling with support for various field types and relationships
Extensive API options, including REST, GraphQL, and real-time subscriptions
User-friendly interface with a modern, customizable admin app

Cons of Directus

Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
Potentially higher resource requirements for larger projects
Less focus on content management specific features compared to Squidex

Code Comparison

Squidex (C#):

public class ContentController : ApiController
{
    [HttpGet]
    [Route("api/content/{app}/{schema}")]
    public IActionResult GetContent(string app, string schema)
    {
        // Content retrieval logic
    }
}

Directus (JavaScript):

router.get('/items/:collection', async (req, res) => {
    const { collection } = req.params;
    const items = await getItems(collection);
    res.json({ data: items });
});

Both projects offer robust content management capabilities, but Directus provides a more flexible and extensible platform for various data-driven applications. Squidex, on the other hand, focuses more on traditional content management scenarios and may be easier to set up for simpler use cases.

strapi

63,346

🚀 Strapi is the leading open-source headless CMS. It’s 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, fully customizable, and developer-first.

Pros of Strapi

More extensive plugin ecosystem and marketplace
Larger community and more active development
Better documentation and learning resources

Cons of Strapi

Higher resource consumption, especially for larger projects
Steeper learning curve for complex customizations
Less flexible content modeling compared to Squidex

Code Comparison

Strapi (JavaScript):

module.exports = {
  lifecycles: {
    async beforeCreate(data) {
      data.slug = slugify(data.title, { lower: true });
    },
  },
};

Squidex (C#):

public class SlugifyContentTrigger : IContentTrigger
{
    public Task<ContentData> OnCreatedAsync(IContentEntity content, ContentData data)
    {
        data["slug"] = SlugifyTitle(data["title"].ToString());
        return Task.FromResult(data);
    }
}

Both Strapi and Squidex are headless CMS platforms, but they differ in their approach and implementation. Strapi offers a more user-friendly experience with its extensive plugin ecosystem and active community. However, it may consume more resources and have a steeper learning curve for complex customizations. Squidex, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in content modeling and potentially better performance for larger projects, but has a smaller community and fewer out-of-the-box features compared to Strapi.

keystone

9,208

The superpowered headless CMS for Node.js — built with GraphQL and React

Pros of Keystone

More flexible and customizable, allowing developers to create complex data models and relationships
Offers a GraphQL API out of the box, providing a powerful query language for data retrieval
Supports serverless deployments, making it easier to scale and manage infrastructure

Cons of Keystone

Steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and extensive feature set
Requires more setup and configuration compared to Squidex's more opinionated approach
May have higher resource requirements for larger projects

Code Comparison

Keystone schema definition:

const { Text, Relationship } = require('@keystonejs/fields');

const listSchema = {
  fields: {
    title: { type: Text },
    author: { type: Relationship, ref: 'User' },
  },
};

Squidex schema definition:

{
  "name": "blog",
  "fields": [
    { "name": "title", "type": "string" },
    { "name": "author", "type": "references", "references": "users" }
  ]
}

Both Keystone and Squidex offer powerful content management capabilities, but they cater to different use cases. Keystone provides more flexibility and customization options, making it suitable for complex projects with specific requirements. Squidex, on the other hand, offers a more streamlined approach with a focus on ease of use and quick setup. The choice between the two depends on the project's complexity, scalability needs, and development team's expertise.

cms

3,260

Build bespoke content experiences with Craft.

Pros of Craft CMS

More mature and established project with a larger community
Extensive plugin ecosystem for extending functionality
User-friendly control panel for content management

Cons of Craft CMS

Requires PHP, which may not be preferred by all developers
Commercial license required for some features and use cases
Steeper learning curve for developers new to the platform

Code Comparison

Craft CMS (Twig template):

{% set entries = craft.entries()
    .section('blog')
    .limit(10)
    .all() %}

{% for entry in entries %}
    <h2>{{ entry.title }}</h2>
    {{ entry.body }}
{% endfor %}

Squidex (React component):

import { useQuery } from '@squidex/squidex';

function BlogPosts() {
  const { data } = useQuery('blog', { take: 10 });
  return (
    <>
      {data.items.map(post => (
        <div key={post.id}>
          <h2>{post.data.title}</h2>
          <div>{post.data.body}</div>
        </div>
      ))}
    </>
  );
}

Both Craft CMS and Squidex offer powerful content management capabilities, but they cater to different developer preferences and tech stacks. Craft CMS provides a more traditional CMS experience with PHP and Twig, while Squidex embraces a headless approach with a focus on API-first development and modern JavaScript frameworks.

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

What is Squidex?

Squidex is an open source headless CMS and content management hub. In contrast to a traditional CMS Squidex provides a rich API with OData filter and Swagger definitions. It is up to you to build your UI on top of it. It can be website, a native app or just another server. We build it with ASP.NET Core and CQRS and is tested for Windows and Linux on modern browsers.

Docker Pulls

Read the docs at https://docs.squidex.io/ (work in progress) or just check out the code and play around.

How to make feature requests, get help or report bugs?

Please join our community forum: https://support.squidex.io

Status

Current Version GitHub release Roadmap: https://trello.com/b/KakM4F3S/squidex-roadmap

Prerequisites

Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio 2022
Node.js (development only)
MongoDB
.NET 8 SDK (Already part of Visual Studio 2022 v17.8)

Deployment Options

Platform	Documentation	Quicklink
Azure	Docs
AWS	Docs
Docker	Docs
GCP	Docs
Heroku	Docs
IIS	Docs
K8S	Docs
Render	Docs
Vultr	Docs

Contributors

Core Team and Founders

Qaisar Ahmad Interaction Designer, Pakistan
Sebastian Stehle Software Engineer, Germany (currently Sweden)

Contributors

civicplus (Avd6977, dsbegnoce): Google Maps support, custom regex patterns and a lot of small improvements.
cpmstars: Asset support for rich editor.
guohai: FTP asset store support, Email rule support, custom editors and bug fixes.
pushrbx: Azure Store support.
razims: GridFS support.
sauravvijay: Kafka Rule action.

Contributing

Please create issues to report bugs, suggest new functionalities, ask questions or just share your thoughts about the project. We will really appreciate your contribution, thanks.

Cloud Version

Although Squidex is free it is also available as a Saas version on https://cloud.squidex.io.

Top Related Projects

Convert designs to code with AI

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot