cms

Pros of Statamic

• Flat-file CMS, allowing for easier version control and deployment
• More lightweight and faster out of the box
• Built-in static site generation capabilities

Cons of Statamic

• Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Craft CMS
• Less flexibility in database options (primarily file-based)
• Steeper learning curve for developers used to traditional CMS structures

Code Comparison

Statamic route definition:

Route::statamic('blog', 'blog.index');

Craft CMS route definition:

return [
    'blog' => ['template' => 'blog/index'],
];

Statamic uses a more Laravel-like syntax for routing, while Craft CMS uses a configuration array approach. This reflects Statamic's closer integration with Laravel, whereas Craft CMS has its own unique structure.

Both CMSs offer powerful content management capabilities, but Statamic focuses on simplicity and speed with its flat-file approach, while Craft CMS provides more traditional database-driven flexibility. The choice between them often depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences.

Pros of October

• Simpler learning curve and easier setup for beginners
• More lightweight and faster performance out of the box
• Free and open-source with a larger community-driven ecosystem

Cons of October

• Less flexible for complex, custom projects compared to Craft's powerful APIs
• Limited built-in localization features
• Smaller selection of official plugins and add-ons

Code Comparison

October CMS (PHP):

<?php
class Article extends \Model
{
    use \October\Rain\Database\Traits\Validation;
    
    public $rules = [
        'title' => 'required',
        'content' => 'required'
    ];
}

Craft CMS (PHP):

<?php
namespace app\models;

use craft\base\Model;

class Article extends Model
{
    public function rules()
    {
        return [
            [['title', 'content'], 'required'],
        ];
    }
}

Both examples show basic model definitions with validation rules, but Craft uses a more object-oriented approach with namespaces and method-based rule definitions, while October uses traits and public properties for a more concise syntax.

Pros of Kirby

• Lightweight and file-based CMS, requiring no database
• Simpler learning curve and easier setup process
• More flexible and customizable for developers

Cons of Kirby

• Limited built-in features compared to Craft CMS
• Smaller community and ecosystem
• Paid license required for commercial use

Code Comparison

Kirby (PHP):

<?= $page->title() ?>
<?php foreach ($page->children() as $child): ?>
  <h2><?= $child->title() ?></h2>
  <?= $child->text()->kirbytext() ?>
<?php endforeach ?>

Craft CMS (Twig):

{{ entry.title }}
{% for child in entry.children.all() %}
  <h2>{{ child.title }}</h2>
  {{ child.bodyContent }}
{% endfor %}

Both Kirby and Craft CMS are popular content management systems, but they cater to different needs. Kirby is more suitable for smaller projects or developers who prefer a file-based approach, while Craft CMS offers more robust features for larger, complex websites. The code comparison shows that Kirby uses PHP templates, while Craft CMS uses Twig templating. Kirby's syntax is more PHP-like, whereas Craft CMS leverages Twig's cleaner and more readable syntax.