cms

Pros of Craft CMS

• More mature and established project with a larger community
• Offers a robust plugin ecosystem with extensive third-party integrations
• Provides a powerful and flexible content modeling system

Cons of Craft CMS

• Steeper learning curve for developers new to the platform
• Higher licensing costs for commercial projects
• Requires more server resources compared to Statamic

Code Comparison

Craft CMS (Twig template):

{% set entries = craft.entries()
    .section('blog')
    .limit(10)
    .all() %}

{% for entry in entries %}
    <h2>{{ entry.title }}</h2>
    {{ entry.body }}
{% endfor %}

Statamic (Antlers template):

{{ collection:blog limit="10" }}
    <h2>{{ title }}</h2>
    {{ content }}
{{ /collection:blog }}

Both CMSs use different templating engines, with Craft using Twig and Statamic using Antlers. Craft's approach is more verbose but offers more flexibility, while Statamic's syntax is more concise and easier to read for simple queries. Craft's content fetching is done through a fluent API, whereas Statamic uses a tag-based system for retrieving and displaying content.

Pros of October

• Free and open-source, making it more accessible for developers and small projects
• Larger community and ecosystem, with more plugins and extensions available
• More flexible and customizable, allowing for deeper modifications to the core system

Cons of October

• Less polished and user-friendly interface for content editors
• Steeper learning curve for developers, especially those new to Laravel
• Less frequent updates and potentially slower bug fixes

Code Comparison

October CMS:

public function onRun()
{
    $this['posts'] = Post::orderBy('created_at', 'desc')->get();
}

Statamic:

public function index()
{
    $posts = Entry::query()->where('collection', 'posts')->get();
    return view('posts.index', compact('posts'));
}

Both CMSs use Laravel as their foundation, but their approach to content management differs. October CMS relies more on traditional database-driven models, while Statamic uses a flat-file system by default. This is reflected in their code structure and how they handle content retrieval.

October CMS tends to have more flexibility in terms of database interactions and custom functionality, while Statamic offers a more streamlined approach to content management with its built-in features and Antlers templating language.

Pros of Kirby

• Flat-file CMS, requiring no database, which simplifies setup and deployment
• More lightweight and faster performance due to its file-based structure
• Highly customizable with a flexible plugin system

Cons of Kirby

• Paid license required for commercial use, unlike Statamic's free open-source version
• Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Statamic
• Less built-in features out of the box, requiring more custom development

Code Comparison

Kirby (PHP):

<?php
return [
  'title' => 'My Page',
  'text'  => 'Hello, World!',
  'date'  => '2023-04-15'
];

Statamic (PHP/Blade):

---
title: My Page
text: Hello, World!
date: 2023-04-15
---
{{ text }}

Both CMSs use a similar approach for defining page content, but Kirby uses pure PHP arrays while Statamic employs YAML-like front matter. Statamic's syntax is more concise and allows for easier integration of template logic within content files.

Kirby's file-based structure offers simplicity and speed, while Statamic provides a more robust feature set and larger community. The choice between them depends on project requirements, budget constraints, and developer preferences.

Pros of Pagekit

• Free and open-source, allowing for unlimited use and customization
• Lightweight and fast, with a modern and intuitive user interface
• Built-in marketplace for easy extension and theme installation

Cons of Pagekit

• Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Statamic
• Less frequent updates and potentially slower bug fixes
• Limited built-in features, requiring more extensions for advanced functionality

Code Comparison

Pagekit (Vue.js component):

<template>
    <div class="uk-margin">
        <label class="uk-form-label">{{ 'Title' | trans }}</label>
        <div class="uk-form-controls">
            <input class="uk-input" v-model="node.title" required>
        </div>
    </div>
</template>

Statamic (Antlers template):

{{ form:create }}
    <div class="mb-4">
        <label for="title">{{ trans:strings.title }}</label>
        <input type="text" name="title" id="title" value="{{ old:title }}" required>
    </div>
{{ /form:create }}

Both CMS platforms use component-based architectures, but Pagekit leverages Vue.js while Statamic uses its proprietary Antlers templating engine. Pagekit's code tends to be more JavaScript-centric, while Statamic's approach is more PHP-oriented with a custom templating syntax.