Top Related Projects
🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js
The simplified HTTP request client 'request' with Promise support. Powered by Bluebird.
Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
Ajax for Node.js and browsers (JS HTTP client). Maintained for @forwardemail, @ladjs, @spamscanner, @breejs, @cabinjs, and @lassjs.
HTTP Request & Response Service, written in Python + Flask.
Quick Overview
TooTallNate/proxy-agents is a Node.js library that provides a collection of HTTP/HTTPS proxy agent implementations. It allows developers to easily configure and use various types of proxy agents in their Node.js applications, supporting different proxy protocols and authentication methods.
Pros
- Supports multiple proxy types (HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS, etc.)
- Easy integration with Node.js HTTP/HTTPS modules
- Handles proxy authentication seamlessly
- Actively maintained and well-documented
Cons
- Limited to Node.js environment
- May require additional configuration for complex proxy setups
- Performance impact when using proxies (inherent to proxy usage)
Code Examples
- Creating an HTTP proxy agent:
const { HttpProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const agent = new HttpProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:8080');
- Using an HTTPS proxy agent with authentication:
const { HttpsProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const agent = new HttpsProxyAgent('https://user:pass@proxy.example.com:8443');
- Creating a SOCKS proxy agent:
const { SocksProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const agent = new SocksProxyAgent('socks://127.0.0.1:9150');
Getting Started
To use proxy-agents in your Node.js project:
-
Install the package:
npm install proxy-agents
-
Import and use the desired proxy agent:
const { HttpProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents'); const https = require('https'); const agent = new HttpProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:8080'); https.get('https://api.example.com', { agent }, (res) => { // Handle response });
This example creates an HTTP proxy agent and uses it with the Node.js https
module to make a request through the specified proxy.
Competitor Comparisons
🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js
Pros of got
- More comprehensive HTTP client with support for various HTTP methods
- Extensive features including retries, pagination, and caching
- Active development and large community support
Cons of got
- Larger package size and potentially more dependencies
- May be overkill for simple proxy-related tasks
- Learning curve for advanced features
Code comparison
proxy-agents:
const { HttpProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const agent = new HttpProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:3128');
got:
const got = require('got');
const response = await got('https://example.com', {
agent: {
http: new HttpProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:3128')
}
});
Key differences
- proxy-agents focuses specifically on proxy functionality, while got is a full-featured HTTP client
- got provides a higher-level API for making HTTP requests, whereas proxy-agents is more focused on creating proxy agents
- proxy-agents may be more suitable for projects that only need proxy support, while got is better for complex HTTP operations
Use cases
proxy-agents:
- Creating proxy agents for specific protocols
- Integrating proxy support into existing HTTP clients
got:
- Making HTTP requests with advanced features like retries and pagination
- Projects requiring a versatile HTTP client with built-in proxy support
Both libraries have their strengths, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your project.
The simplified HTTP request client 'request' with Promise support. Powered by Bluebird.
Pros of request-promise
- Simpler API for making HTTP requests with Promise support
- Extensive documentation and large community support
- Built-in features like automatic parsing of JSON responses
Cons of request-promise
- Lacks specific proxy support out of the box
- Deprecated and no longer maintained
- May require additional configuration for complex proxy scenarios
Code Comparison
request-promise:
const rp = require('request-promise');
rp('http://example.com')
.then(response => console.log(response))
.catch(error => console.error(error));
proxy-agents:
const { HttpProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const https = require('https');
const agent = new HttpProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:8080');
https.get('https://example.com', { agent }, (res) => {
// Handle response
});
Key Differences
- proxy-agents focuses specifically on providing various proxy agent implementations for different protocols
- request-promise is a more general-purpose HTTP client library with Promise support
- proxy-agents offers more flexibility for complex proxy configurations
- request-promise provides a higher-level abstraction for making HTTP requests
Use Cases
- Use proxy-agents when you need fine-grained control over proxy settings for different protocols
- Choose request-promise for simpler HTTP requests with Promise support, but consider alternatives due to its deprecated status
Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
Pros of axios
- Widely adopted and well-maintained HTTP client with extensive features
- Supports both browser and Node.js environments
- Automatic request and response transformations
Cons of axios
- Larger bundle size compared to lightweight alternatives
- May be overkill for simple HTTP requests
- Less focused on proxy-specific functionality
Code comparison
axios:
import axios from 'axios';
axios.get('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => console.log(response.data))
.catch(error => console.error(error));
proxy-agents:
import { HttpsProxyAgent } from 'proxy-agents';
const agent = new HttpsProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:8080');
https.get('https://api.example.com/data', { agent }, (res) => {
// Handle response
});
Key differences
- proxy-agents focuses specifically on proxy functionality for various protocols
- axios provides a more comprehensive HTTP client solution
- proxy-agents offers more granular control over proxy settings
- axios has built-in features like request/response interceptors and cancellation
Use cases
- Choose axios for general-purpose HTTP requests and when working with RESTful APIs
- Opt for proxy-agents when dealing with complex proxy scenarios or requiring protocol-specific agents
Community and ecosystem
- axios has a larger community and more third-party integrations
- proxy-agents is more specialized and may have a smaller but focused user base
A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
Pros of node-fetch
- Simpler API, closely mimicking the browser's Fetch API
- Lightweight and focused solely on HTTP requests
- Widely adopted and well-maintained
Cons of node-fetch
- Lacks built-in proxy support
- Requires additional libraries for advanced features like automatic retries
Code Comparison
node-fetch:
import fetch from 'node-fetch';
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
const data = await response.json();
proxy-agents:
import { HttpsProxyAgent } from 'proxy-agents';
const agent = new HttpsProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:8080');
const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data', { agent });
Summary
node-fetch is a popular and lightweight library that closely mimics the browser's Fetch API, making it easy to use for simple HTTP requests. However, it lacks built-in proxy support and some advanced features.
proxy-agents, on the other hand, focuses on providing various proxy agent implementations for different protocols. It's more specialized and can be used in conjunction with node-fetch or other HTTP clients to add proxy support.
The choice between these libraries depends on your specific needs. If you require proxy support or advanced networking features, proxy-agents might be more suitable. For simple HTTP requests without proxy requirements, node-fetch offers a straightforward and familiar API.
Ajax for Node.js and browsers (JS HTTP client). Maintained for @forwardemail, @ladjs, @spamscanner, @breejs, @cabinjs, and @lassjs.
Pros of superagent
- More comprehensive HTTP client with support for various request types and features
- Extensive plugin ecosystem for additional functionality
- Better suited for general-purpose API interactions and complex requests
Cons of superagent
- Larger package size and potentially more overhead for simple proxy use cases
- Less focused on proxy-specific functionality compared to proxy-agents
- May require additional configuration for proxy support
Code Comparison
proxy-agents:
const { HttpsProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const agent = new HttpsProxyAgent('http://proxy.example.com:3128');
https.get('https://example.com', { agent }, (res) => {
// Handle response
});
superagent:
const superagent = require('superagent');
superagent
.get('https://example.com')
.proxy('http://proxy.example.com:3128')
.end((err, res) => {
// Handle response
});
Summary
proxy-agents is a focused library for creating proxy agents, while superagent is a more comprehensive HTTP client with proxy support. proxy-agents is lightweight and specifically designed for proxy scenarios, making it ideal for projects primarily concerned with proxy functionality. superagent offers a wider range of features and flexibility, making it suitable for more complex API interactions and general-purpose HTTP requests, but may be overkill for simple proxy use cases.
HTTP Request & Response Service, written in Python + Flask.
Pros of httpbin
- Provides a comprehensive set of HTTP testing endpoints
- Well-documented and widely used in the developer community
- Supports various HTTP methods and response types
Cons of httpbin
- Focused solely on HTTP testing, not a general-purpose networking tool
- Requires server setup or reliance on public instances for use
Code Comparison
httpbin (Python):
@app.route('/ip')
def ip_address():
return jsonify(origin=request.remote_addr)
proxy-agents (JavaScript):
const { HttpsProxyAgent } = require('proxy-agents');
const agent = new HttpsProxyAgent('https://proxy.example.com:3128');
https.get('https://example.com', { agent }, (res) => {
// Handle response
});
Key Differences
- Purpose: httpbin is for HTTP testing, while proxy-agents is for handling various proxy types in Node.js
- Language: httpbin is written in Python, proxy-agents in JavaScript
- Functionality: httpbin provides a server with test endpoints, proxy-agents offers client-side proxy support
Use Cases
- httpbin: API testing, debugging HTTP requests, educational purposes
- proxy-agents: Implementing proxy support in Node.js applications, handling various proxy protocols
Community and Maintenance
- httpbin: Maintained by Postman, widely used and actively maintained
- proxy-agents: Smaller project, focused on Node.js ecosystem, regular updates
Both projects serve different purposes and can be complementary in a developer's toolkit, depending on the specific needs of HTTP testing or proxy handling.
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Node.js HTTP Proxy Agents Monorepo
This monorepo contains various Node.js HTTP Agent implementations that operate over proxies using various protocols.
For the most common use-cases, you should be using the proxy-agent
module, which utilizes the other, more low-level, agent implementations.
You can find changelogs here.
Top Related Projects
🌐 Human-friendly and powerful HTTP request library for Node.js
The simplified HTTP request client 'request' with Promise support. Powered by Bluebird.
Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
Ajax for Node.js and browsers (JS HTTP client). Maintained for @forwardemail, @ladjs, @spamscanner, @breejs, @cabinjs, and @lassjs.
HTTP Request & Response Service, written in Python + Flask.
Convert
designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot