Convert Figma logo to code with AI

TrilonIO logoaspnetcore-angular-universal

ASP.NET Core & Angular Universal advanced starter - PWA w/ server-side rendering for SEO, Bootstrap, i18n internationalization, TypeScript, unit testing, WebAPI REST setup, SignalR, Swagger docs, and more! By @TrilonIO

1,460
434
1,460
109

Top Related Projects

ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.

Server-side rendering and Prerendering for Angular

ASP.NET Core backend implementation for RealWorld

[Archived] This repository has been archived

ASP.NET Core & Angular Universal advanced starter - PWA w/ server-side rendering for SEO, Bootstrap, i18n internationalization, TypeScript, unit testing, WebAPI REST setup, SignalR, Swagger docs, and more! By @TrilonIO

23,468

Smart Monorepos · Fast CI

Quick Overview

TrilonIO/aspnetcore-angular-universal is a project template that combines ASP.NET Core and Angular Universal for server-side rendering (SSR) of Angular applications. It provides a robust foundation for building high-performance, SEO-friendly web applications with a .NET backend and Angular frontend.

Pros

  • Improved initial load time and SEO performance through server-side rendering
  • Seamless integration between ASP.NET Core backend and Angular frontend
  • Built-in support for Angular Universal, simplifying SSR implementation
  • Includes pre-configured build and development scripts for both client and server

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with both ASP.NET Core and Angular
  • Increased complexity compared to client-side only Angular applications
  • May require additional server resources due to SSR processing
  • Limited documentation and community support compared to more mainstream setups

Code Examples

  1. Angular component with server-side rendering support:
import { Component, Inject, PLATFORM_ID } from '@angular/core';
import { isPlatformServer } from '@angular/common';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-home',
  template: '<h1>Welcome to {{ title }}</h1>'
})
export class HomeComponent {
  title = 'My SSR App';

  constructor(@Inject(PLATFORM_ID) private platformId: Object) {
    if (isPlatformServer(this.platformId)) {
      console.log('This is running on the server');
    } else {
      console.log('This is running in the browser');
    }
  }
}
  1. ASP.NET Core controller for serving Angular app:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;

public class HomeController : Controller
{
    public IActionResult Index()
    {
        return View();
    }

    [Route("api/[controller]")]
    public IActionResult SampleData()
    {
        return Json(new { message = "Data from server" });
    }
}
  1. Angular service for making API calls:
import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { HttpClient } from '@angular/common/http';
import { Observable } from 'rxjs';

@Injectable({
  providedIn: 'root'
})
export class ApiService {
  constructor(private http: HttpClient) {}

  getData(): Observable<any> {
    return this.http.get('/api/home/sampledata');
  }
}

Getting Started

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone https://github.com/TrilonIO/aspnetcore-angular-universal.git
    
  2. Navigate to the project directory:

    cd aspnetcore-angular-universal
    
  3. Install dependencies:

    npm install
    
  4. Run the development server:

    npm run dev:ssr
    
  5. Open your browser and navigate to http://localhost:4200 to see the application running.

Competitor Comparisons

ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.

Pros of aspnetcore

  • Comprehensive framework for building web applications and services
  • Extensive documentation and community support
  • Regular updates and maintenance by Microsoft

Cons of aspnetcore

  • Steeper learning curve for developers new to .NET ecosystem
  • Larger footprint compared to more specialized solutions
  • May require more configuration for specific use cases

Code Comparison

aspnetcore-angular-universal:

app.UseSpa(spa =>
{
    spa.Options.SourcePath = "ClientApp";
    spa.UseSpaPrerendering(options =>
    {
        options.BootModulePath = $"{spa.Options.SourcePath}/dist-server/main.js";
        options.BootModuleBuilder = env.IsDevelopment()
            ? new AngularCliBuilder(npmScript: "build:ssr")
            : null;
        options.ExcludeUrls = new[] { "/sockjs-node" };
    });
});

aspnetcore:

app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
    endpoints.MapControllerRoute(
        name: "default",
        pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
    endpoints.MapRazorPages();
});

The aspnetcore-angular-universal repository provides a more specialized solution for Angular Universal integration with ASP.NET Core, while aspnetcore offers a broader framework for various web application scenarios. The code snippets demonstrate the difference in configuration, with aspnetcore-angular-universal focusing on SPA setup and aspnetcore showing general routing configuration.

Server-side rendering and Prerendering for Angular

Pros of Universal

  • Official Angular project with extensive documentation and community support
  • Broader compatibility across different server environments
  • More frequent updates and maintenance

Cons of Universal

  • Requires more setup and configuration for ASP.NET Core integration
  • Less optimized for Microsoft-specific technologies
  • May require additional effort to integrate with .NET-specific features

Code Comparison

aspnetcore-angular-universal:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration => {
        configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/dist";
    });
}

Universal:

import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { ServerModule } from '@angular/platform-server';
import { AppModule } from './app.module';
import { AppComponent } from './app.component';

@NgModule({
  imports: [AppModule, ServerModule],
  bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppServerModule {}

Key Differences

  • aspnetcore-angular-universal is specifically tailored for ASP.NET Core integration
  • Universal provides a more generic solution for server-side rendering
  • aspnetcore-angular-universal includes pre-configured ASP.NET Core setup
  • Universal requires manual integration with server-side technologies

Use Cases

  • Choose aspnetcore-angular-universal for seamless ASP.NET Core and Angular integration
  • Opt for Universal when working with non-Microsoft server environments or requiring more flexibility

ASP.NET Core backend implementation for RealWorld

Pros of aspnetcore-realworld-example-app

  • Implements a full-stack application with both backend and frontend components
  • Follows the RealWorld specification, making it easier to compare with other implementations
  • Includes comprehensive API documentation and testing

Cons of aspnetcore-realworld-example-app

  • Lacks server-side rendering capabilities
  • Does not include Angular integration, focusing solely on ASP.NET Core
  • May require additional setup for modern frontend frameworks

Code Comparison

aspnetcore-realworld-example-app:

public class Startup
{
    public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
    {
        services.AddMvc();
        services.AddSwaggerGen();
    }
}

aspnetcore-angular-universal:

@NgModule({
  imports: [
    BrowserModule.withServerTransition({ appId: 'my-app' }),
    ServerModule,
    ModuleMapLoaderModule
  ],
  bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppServerModule {}

The aspnetcore-realworld-example-app focuses on setting up ASP.NET Core services, while aspnetcore-angular-universal demonstrates Angular Universal configuration for server-side rendering.

aspnetcore-realworld-example-app provides a more comprehensive backend implementation, but lacks the frontend integration and server-side rendering capabilities of aspnetcore-angular-universal. The latter offers a more complete full-stack solution with Angular, making it potentially easier to develop modern web applications with server-side rendering support.

[Archived] This repository has been archived

Pros of JavaScriptServices

  • Official Microsoft repository, ensuring long-term support and integration with ASP.NET Core
  • Broader scope, supporting multiple SPA frameworks (Angular, React, Vue)
  • More comprehensive documentation and examples

Cons of JavaScriptServices

  • Less focused on Angular-specific optimizations
  • May have a steeper learning curve due to its broader scope
  • Less frequent updates compared to community-driven projects

Code Comparison

aspnetcore-angular-universal:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration => {
        configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/dist";
    });
}

JavaScriptServices:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration => {
        configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/build";
    });
}

Both repositories provide similar functionality for configuring SPA static files, with minor differences in the default root path.

Summary

JavaScriptServices offers a more comprehensive solution for integrating various SPA frameworks with ASP.NET Core, backed by Microsoft. However, aspnetcore-angular-universal provides a more focused and potentially optimized approach for Angular-specific projects. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements and the development team's preferences.

ASP.NET Core & Angular Universal advanced starter - PWA w/ server-side rendering for SEO, Bootstrap, i18n internationalization, TypeScript, unit testing, WebAPI REST setup, SignalR, Swagger docs, and more! By @TrilonIO

Pros of aspnetcore-angular-universal

  • Provides a comprehensive template for ASP.NET Core and Angular Universal integration
  • Includes server-side rendering (SSR) for improved performance and SEO
  • Offers a well-structured project setup with clear separation of concerns

Cons of aspnetcore-angular-universal

  • May have a steeper learning curve for developers new to ASP.NET Core or Angular Universal
  • Potentially more complex deployment process due to the combination of technologies
  • Could require more resources to run compared to a client-side only Angular application

Code Comparison

aspnetcore-angular-universal:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration => configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/dist");
    services.AddMvc().SetCompatibilityVersion(CompatibilityVersion.Version_2_2);
}

Both repositories appear to be the same project, so there isn't a meaningful code comparison to make between them. The code snippet above shows how the ASP.NET Core services are configured to work with the Angular Universal setup.

Summary

aspnetcore-angular-universal provides a robust starting point for developers looking to create a full-stack application using ASP.NET Core and Angular with server-side rendering capabilities. While it offers numerous benefits in terms of performance and SEO, it may require more initial setup and resources compared to simpler client-side only Angular applications. The project structure and integration between the two technologies make it an excellent choice for complex web applications that need the power of both ASP.NET Core and Angular Universal.

23,468

Smart Monorepos · Fast CI

Pros of nx

  • Supports multiple frontend frameworks (Angular, React, Vue) and backend technologies
  • Provides powerful code generation and project scaffolding tools
  • Offers advanced dependency management and project visualization

Cons of nx

  • Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
  • May be overkill for smaller projects or teams
  • Requires more setup and configuration compared to simpler solutions

Code Comparison

aspnetcore-angular-universal:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration => {
        configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/dist";
    });
}

nx:

// workspace.json
{
  "projects": {
    "my-app": {
      "root": "apps/my-app",
      "sourceRoot": "apps/my-app/src",
      "projectType": "application",
      "architect": {
        "build": {
          "builder": "@angular-devkit/build-angular:browser",
          "options": {
            // ...
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

The aspnetcore-angular-universal repository focuses on integrating ASP.NET Core with Angular Universal for server-side rendering, while nx provides a more comprehensive monorepo solution for managing multiple projects and technologies. nx offers greater flexibility and scalability but may require more initial setup and learning.

Convert Figma logo designs to code with AI

Visual Copilot

Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.

Try Visual Copilot

README

ASP.NET Core 2.1 & Angular 7(+) Advanced Starter - PWA & Server-side prerendering (for Angular SEO)!



Trilon.io - Angular Universal, NestJS, JavaScript Application Consulting Development and Training

Made with :heart: by Trilon.io


Harness the power of Angular 7+, ASP.NET Core 2.1, now with SEO !

Angular SEO in action:

ASP.NET Core Angular7 SEO

Angular Universal Application Architecture

ASP.NET Core 2.1 Angular 7+ Starter

What is this repo? Live Demo here: http://aspnetcore-angular2-universal.azurewebsites.net

This repository is maintained by Trilon.io and the Angular Universal team and is meant to be an advanced starter for both ASP.NET Core 2.1 using Angular 7.0+, not only for the client-side, but to be rendered on the server for instant application paints (Note: If you don't need SSR read here on how to disable it).

This is meant to be a Feature-Rich Starter application containing all of the latest technologies, best build systems available, and include many real-world examples and libraries needed in todays Single Page Applications (SPAs).

This utilizes all the latest standards, no gulp, no bower, no typings, no manually "building" anything. NPM, Webpack and .NET handle everything for you!

Join us on Gitter

Gitter chat

Table of Contents


Features:

These are just some of the features found in this starter!

  • ASP.NET 2.1 - VS2017 support now!

    • Azure delpoyment straight from VS2017
    • Built in docker support through VS2017
    • RestAPI (WebAPI) integration
    • SQL Database CRUD demo
    • Swagger WebAPI documentation when running in development mode
    • SignalR Chat demo! (Thanks to @hakonamatata)
  • Angular 7.0.0 :

    • PWA (Progressive Web App)
    • (Minimal) Angular-CLI integration
      • This is to be used mainly for Generating Components/Services/etc.
      • Usage examples:
        • ng g c components/example-component
        • ng g s shared/some-service
    • Featuring Server-side rendering (Platform-Server, aka: "Universal")
      • Faster initial paints, SEO (Search-engine optimization w Title/Meta/Link tags), social media link-previews, etc
    • i18n internationalization support (via/ ngx-translate)
    • Baked in best-practices (follows Angular style guide)
    • Bootstrap3 (with ngx-bootstrap) - (can be rendered on the server!)
      • Can be easily replaced with bootstrap4 (3 is provided for browser support)
      • Bootstrap using SCSS / SASS for easy theming / styling!
  • Webpack build system (Webpack 4)

    • HMR : Hot Module Reloading/Replacement
    • Production builds w/ AoT Compilation
  • Testing frameworks

    • Unit testing with Jest (Going back to Karma soon)
  • Productivity

    • Typescript 2
    • Codelyzer (for Real-time static code analysis)
      • VSCode & Atom provide real-time analysis out of the box.
  • ASP.NET Core 2.1

    • Integration with NodeJS to provide pre-rendering, as well as any other Node module asset you want to use.
  • Azure

    • Microsoft Application Insights setup (for MVC & Web API routing)
    • Client-side Angular Application Insights integration
        // Add the Module to your imports 
        ApplicationInsightsModule.forRoot({
          instrumentationKey: 'Your-Application-Insights-instrumentationKey'
        })
      
  • Docker

    • Built in Visual Studio F5 Debugging support
    • Uses the very light weight microsoft/dotnet image
    • Currently limited to Linux image as there is a bug with running nodejs in a container on Windows.


Getting Started?

  • Make sure you have at least Node 8.11.1 or higher (w/ npm 5+) installed!
  • This repository uses ASP.Net Core 2.1, which has a hard requirement on .NET Core Runtime 2.1 and .NET Core SDK 2.1. Please install these items from here

Visual Studio 2017

Make sure you have .NET Core 2.1 installed and/or VS2017 15.3. VS2017 will automatically install all the neccessary npm & .NET dependencies when you open the project.

Simply push F5 to start debugging !

Docker-Support: Change the startup project to docker-compose and press F5

Note: If you get any errors after this such as module not found: boot.server (or similar), open up command line and run npm run build:dev to make sure all the assets have been properly built by Webpack.

Visual Studio Code

Note: Make sure you have the C# extension & .NET Core Debugger installed.

The project comes with the configured Launch.json files to let you just push F5 to start the project.

# cd into the directory you cloned the project into
npm install && npm run build:dev && dotnet restore
# or yarn install

If you're running the project from command line with dotnet run make sure you set your environment variables to Development (otherwise things like HMR might not work).

# on Windows:
set ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Development
# on Mac/Linux
export ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Development 

Upcoming Features:

  • Clean API / structure / simplify application
  • Refactor to latest RxJs pipeable syntax
  • Attempt to integrate with Angular-CLI fully


Deployment

Dotnet publish

Using dotnet publish, when it's finished place the generated folder onto your server and use IIS to fire everything up.

Heroku

Deploy on Heroku

Azure

git remote add azure https://your-user-name@my-angular2-site.scm.azurewebsites.net:443/my-angular2-site.git
                     // ^ get this from Azure (Web App Overview section - Git clone url)

git push --set-upstream azure master 

Application Structure:

Note: This application has WebAPI (our REST API) setup inside the same project, but of course all of this could be abstracted out into a completely separate project('s) ideally. .NET Core things are all done in the same project for simplicity's sake.

Root level files

Here we have the usual suspects found at the root level.

Front-end oriented files:

  • package.json - NPM project dependencies & scripts
  • .tsconfig - TypeScript configuration (here we setup PATHs as well)
  • webpack - configuration files (modular bundling + so much more)
  • karma - configuration files (unit testing)
  • protractor - config files (e2e testing)
  • tslint - TypeScript code linting rules

/ClientApp/ - Everything Angular

Let's take a look at how this is structured so we can make some sense of it all!

With Angular Universal, we need to split our applicatoin logic per platform so if we look inside this folder, you'll see the 2 root files, that branch the entire logic for browser & server respectively.

  • Boot.Browser.ts - This file starts up the entire Angular application for the Client/browser platform.

Here we setup a few things, client Angular bootstrapping.

You'll barely need to touch this file, but something to note, this is the file where you would import libraries that you only want being used in the Browser. (Just know that you'd have to provide a mock implementation for the Server when doing that).

  • Boot.Server.ts - This file is where Angular platform-server serializes the Angular application itself on the .NET server within a very quick Node process, and renders it a string. This is what causes that initial fast paint of the entire application to the Browser, and helps us get all our SEO goodness :sparkles:

Notice the folder structure here in ./ClientApp/ :

+ /ClientApp/

+   /app/
    App NgModule - our Root NgModule (you'll insert Components/etc here most often)
    AppComponent / App Routes / global css styles

    * Notice that we have 2 dividing NgModules:
        app.module.browser & app.module.server
    You'll almost always be using the common app.module, but these 2 are used to split up platform logic
    for situations where you need to use Dependency Injection / etc, between platforms.

Note: You could use whatever folder conventions you'd like, I prefer to split up things in terms of whether they are re-usable 
     "components" or routeable / page-like components that group together and organize entire sections.
++ > ++ > /components/ 
          Here are all the regular Components that aren't "Pages" or container Components

++ > ++ > /containers/
          These are the routeable or "Page / Container" Components, sometimes known as "Dumb" Components

++ > ++ > /shared/
          Here we put all shared Services / Directives / Pipes etc

When adding new features/components/etc to your application you'll be commonly adding things to the Root NgModule (located in /ClientApp/app/app.module.ts), but why are there two other NgModules in this folder?

This is because we want to split our logic per Platform, but notice they both share the Common NgModule named app.module.ts. When adding most things to your application, this is the only place you'll have to add in your new Component / Directive / Pipe / etc. You'll only occassional need to manually add in the Platform specific things to either app.module.browser || app.module.server.

To illustrate this point with an example, you can see how we're using Dependency Injection to inject a StorageService that is different for the Browser & Server.

// For the Browser (app.module.browser)
{ provide: StorageService, useClass: BrowserStorage }

// For the Server (app.module.server)
{ provide: StorageService, useClass: ServerStorage }

Just remember, you'll usually only need to worry about app.module.ts, as that's where you'll be adding most of your applications new aspects!

/Server/ - Our REST API (WebApi) - MVC Controller

As we pointed out, these are here for simplicities sake, and realistically you may want separate projects for all your microservices / REST API projects / etc.

We're utilizing MVC within this application, but we only need & have ONE Controller, named HomeController. This is where our entire Angular application gets serialized into a String, sent to the Browser, along with all the assets it needs to then bootstrap on the client-side, and become a full-blown SPA afterwards.


The short-version is that we invoke that Node process, passing in our Request object & invoke the boot.server file, and we get back a nice object that we pass into .NETs ViewData object, and sprinkle through out our Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml and /Views/Home/index.cshtml files!

A more detailed explanation can be found here: ng-AspnetCore-Engine Readme

// Prerender / Serialize application
var prerenderResult = await Prerenderer.RenderToString(
    /* all of our parameters / options / boot.server file / customData object goes here */
);

ViewData["SpaHtml"] = prerenderResult.Html;
ViewData["Title"] = prerenderResult.Globals["title"];
ViewData["Styles"] = prerenderResult.Globals["styles"];
ViewData["Meta"] = prerenderResult.Globals["meta"];
ViewData["Links"] = prerenderResult.Globals["links"];

return View(); // let's render the MVC View

Take a look at the _Layout.cshtml file for example, notice how we let .NET handle and inject all our SEO magic (that we extracted from Angular itself) !

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
    <head>
        <base href="/" />
        <!-- Title will be the one you set in your Angular application -->
        <title>@ViewData["Title"] - AspNET.Core Angular 7.0.0 (+) starter</title>

        <meta charset="utf-8" />
        <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
        @Html.Raw(ViewData["Meta"]) <!-- <meta /> tags -->
        @Html.Raw(ViewData["Links"]) <!-- <link /> tags -->
        
        <link rel="stylesheet" href="~/dist/vendor.css" asp-append-version="true" />

        @Html.Raw(ViewData["Styles"]) <!-- <style /> tags -->

    </head>
    ... etc ...

Our Views/Home/index.cshtml simply renders the application and serves the bundled webpack files in it.

@Html.Raw(ViewData["SpaHtml"])

<script src="~/dist/vendor.js" asp-append-version="true"></script>
@section scripts {
    <script src="~/dist/main-client.js" asp-append-version="true"></script>
}

What happens after the App gets server rendered?

Well now, your Client-side Angular will take over, and you'll have a fully functioning SPA. (But we gained all these great SEO benefits of being server-rendered) !

:sparkles:



"Gotchas"

  • This repository uses ASP.Net Core 2.1, which has a hard requirement on .NET Core Runtime 2.1 and .NET Core SDK 2.1. Please install these items from here

When building components in Angular 7 there are a few things to keep in mind.

  • Make sure you provide Absolute URLs when calling any APIs. (The server can't understand relative paths, so /api/whatever will fail).

  • API calls will be ran during a server, and once again during the client render, so make sure you're using transfering data that's important to you so that you don't see a flicker.

  • window, document, navigator, and other browser types - do not exist on the server - so using them, or any library that uses them (jQuery for example) will not work. You do have some options, if you truly need some of this functionality:

    • If you need to use them, consider limiting them to only your client and wrapping them situationally. You can use the Object injected using the PLATFORM_ID token to check whether the current platform is browser or server.
     import { PLATFORM_ID } from '@angular/core';
     import { isPlatformBrowser, isPlatformServer } from '@angular/common';
     
     constructor(@Inject(PLATFORM_ID) private platformId: Object) { ... }
     
     ngOnInit() {
       if (isPlatformBrowser(this.platformId)) {
          // Client only code.
          ...
       }
       if (isPlatformServer(this.platformId)) {
         // Server only code.
         ...
       }
     }
    
    • Try to limit or avoid using setTimeout. It will slow down the server-side rendering process. Make sure to remove them ngOnDestroy in Components.
    • Also for RxJs timeouts, make sure to cancel their stream on success, for they can slow down rendering as well.
  • Don't manipulate the nativeElement directly. Use the Renderer2. We do this to ensure that in any environment we're able to change our view.

constructor(element: ElementRef, renderer: Renderer2) {
  this.renderer.setStyle(element.nativeElement, 'font-size', 'x-large');
}
  • The application runs XHR requests on the server & once again on the Client-side (when the application bootstraps)
    • Use a cache that's transferred from server to client (TODO: Point to the example)
  • Know the difference between attributes and properties in relation to the DOM.
  • Keep your directives stateless as much as possible. For stateful directives, you may need to provide an attribute that reflects the corresponding property with an initial string value such as url in img tag. For our native element the src attribute is reflected as the src property of the element type HTMLImageElement.
  • Error: sass-loader requires node-sass >=4: Either in the docker container or localhost run npm rebuild node-sass -f


FAQ - Also check out the !FAQ Issues label! and the !HOW-TO Issues Label!

How can I disable SSR (Server-side rendering)?

Simply comment out the logic within HomeController, and replace @Html.Raw(ViewData["SpaHtml"]) with just your applications root AppComponent tag ("app-root" in our case): <app-root></app-root>.

You could also remove any isPlatformBrowser/etc logic, and delete the boot.server, app.module.browser & app.module.server files, just make sure your boot.browser file points to app.module.

How do I have code run only in the Browser?

Check the Gotchas on how to use isPlatformBrowser().

How do I Material2 with this repo?

You'll either want to remove SSR for now, or wait as support should be coming to handle platform-server rendering. This is now possible, with the recently updated Angular Material changes. We do not have a tutorial available for this yet.

How can I use jQuery and/or some jQuery plugins with this repo?

Note: If at all possible, try to avoid using jQuery or libraries dependent on it, as there are better, more abstract ways of dealing with the DOM in Angular (5+) such as using the Renderer, etc.

Yes, of course but there are a few things you need to setup before doing this. First, make sure jQuery is included in webpack vendor file, and that you have a webpack Plugin setup for it. new webpack.ProvidePlugin({ $: 'jquery', jQuery: 'jquery' })

Now, make sure any "plugins" etc that you have, are only included in your boot.browser.ts file. (ie: import 'slick-carousel';) In a Component you want to use jQuery, make sure to import it near the top like so:

import * as $ from 'jquery';

Always make sure to wrap anything jQuery oriented in Angular's isPlatformBrowser() conditional!

How can I support IE9 through IE11?

To support IE9 through IE11 open the polyfills.ts file in the polyfills folder and uncomment out the 'import polyfills' as needed. ALSO - make sure that your webpack.config and webpack.config.vendor change option of TerserPlugin from ecma: 6 to ecma: 5.


Special Thanks

Many thanks go out to Steve Sanderson (@SteveSandersonMS) from Microsoft and his amazing work on JavaScriptServices and integrating the world of Node with ASP.NET Core.

Also thank you to the many Contributors !


Found a Bug? Want to Contribute?

Check out our easier issues here

Nothing's ever perfect, but please let me know by creating an issue (make sure there isn't an existing one about it already), and we'll try and work out a fix for it! If you have any good ideas, or want to contribute, feel free to either make an Issue with the Proposal, or just make a PR from your Fork.


License

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2016-2019 Mark Pieszak

Twitter Follow


Trilon - Angular & ASP.NET - Consulting | Training | Development

Check out Trilon.io for more info! Twitter @Trilon_io

Contact us at hello@trilon.io, and let's talk about your projects needs.

Trilon.io - Angular Universal, NestJS, JavaScript Application Consulting Development and Training

Follow Trilon online:

Twitter: @Trilon_io