vue-fullcalendar

Pros of fullcalendar-vue

• More actively maintained with regular updates and bug fixes
• Comprehensive documentation and extensive feature set
• Better TypeScript support and integration

Cons of fullcalendar-vue

• Larger bundle size due to more features
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Commercial license required for some advanced features

Code Comparison

vue-fullcalendar:

<template>
  <full-calendar :events="events" :config="config"></full-calendar>
</template>

fullcalendar-vue:

<template>
  <FullCalendar :options="calendarOptions" />
</template>

The main difference in usage is that fullcalendar-vue uses a single options prop to configure the calendar, while vue-fullcalendar uses separate props for events and configuration.

fullcalendar-vue offers more flexibility and control over calendar options, but may require more setup code. vue-fullcalendar has a simpler API but less customization options.

Overall, fullcalendar-vue is more feature-rich and actively maintained, making it suitable for complex projects. vue-fullcalendar is simpler and may be easier for beginners or smaller projects with basic calendar needs.

Pros of Vuetify

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of pre-built components
• Active development and large community support
• Extensive documentation and examples

Cons of Vuetify

• Larger bundle size due to its extensive feature set
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• May require more configuration for custom designs

Code Comparison

Vuetify calendar component:

<v-calendar
  ref="calendar"
  v-model="value"
  :events="events"
  color="primary"
  type="month"
></v-calendar>

vue-fullcalendar component:

<full-calendar
  :events="events"
  :config="config"
  @event-selected="eventSelected"
></full-calendar>

While both libraries provide calendar functionality, Vuetify offers a more integrated approach within its ecosystem, whereas vue-fullcalendar is a standalone calendar component. Vuetify's calendar is part of a larger UI framework, providing consistency across components, while vue-fullcalendar focuses solely on calendar functionality.

Vuetify's implementation may be more suitable for projects already using the Vuetify framework or requiring a consistent design language. vue-fullcalendar might be preferred for projects needing a lightweight, dedicated calendar solution without additional UI components.

Pros of vue-core

• Comprehensive Vue.js framework with full ecosystem support
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and improvements
• Extensive documentation and community resources

Cons of vue-core

• Larger bundle size and potentially higher learning curve
• May be overkill for simple projects or specific use cases
• Requires additional setup for specialized features like calendars

Code Comparison

vue-fullcalendar:

<full-calendar :events="events" :config="config"></full-calendar>

vue-core:

<template>
  <div>
    <!-- Custom calendar implementation required -->
  </div>
</template>

Summary

vue-fullcalendar is a specialized calendar component for Vue.js, while vue-core is the core framework for building Vue applications. vue-core offers more flexibility and a complete ecosystem but requires additional work to implement specific features like calendars. vue-fullcalendar provides a ready-to-use calendar component but with less customization options and potentially less frequent updates.

Choose vue-core for full-fledged Vue.js applications with diverse requirements, and vue-fullcalendar for projects specifically needing a calendar component with minimal setup.

Pros of Quasar

• Comprehensive UI framework with a wide range of components and tools
• Active development and large community support
• Cross-platform development capabilities (web, mobile, desktop)

Cons of Quasar

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially larger bundle size for simple projects
• May be overkill for projects that only need a calendar component

Code Comparison

vue-fullcalendar:

<template>
  <full-calendar :events="events" :config="config"></full-calendar>
</template>

Quasar:

<template>
  <q-calendar
    v-model="selectedDate"
    :events="events"
    view="month"
  ></q-calendar>
</template>

Summary

vue-fullcalendar is a focused calendar component for Vue.js, while Quasar is a comprehensive UI framework that includes a calendar component among many others. vue-fullcalendar may be simpler to implement for projects that only need a calendar, but Quasar offers more flexibility and features for larger, multi-platform applications. The choice between the two depends on the project's scope and requirements.

Pros of element

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of elements
• Well-documented and actively maintained
• Large community and ecosystem support

Cons of element

• Larger bundle size due to its extensive feature set
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• May require more configuration for specific use cases

Code Comparison

element:

<template>
  <el-calendar v-model="value">
  </el-calendar>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      value: new Date()
    }
  }
}
</script>

vue-fullcalendar:

<template>
  <full-calendar :events="events"></full-calendar>
</template>

<script>
import FullCalendar from 'vue-fullcalendar'
export default {
  components: {
    FullCalendar
  },
  data() {
    return {
      events: []
    }
  }
}
</script>

element provides a more comprehensive set of UI components, including a calendar, while vue-fullcalendar focuses specifically on calendar functionality. element offers greater flexibility and customization options but may be overkill for projects that only require a calendar component. vue-fullcalendar is more lightweight and easier to implement for simple calendar needs but lacks the extensive feature set of element.