Pros of Vue

• Core framework with extensive ecosystem and community support
• Highly flexible and scalable for projects of all sizes
• Comprehensive documentation and learning resources

Cons of Vue

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• More complex setup for large-scale applications
• Frequent updates may require keeping up with changes

Code Comparison

vue2-manage (simplified component):

<template>
  <div class="manage_page fillcontain">
    <el-row style="height: 100%;">
      <el-col :span="4" style="min-height: 100%; background-color: #324057;">
        <el-menu :default-active="defaultActive" style="min-height: 100%;" theme="dark" router>
          <!-- Menu items -->
        </el-menu>
      </el-col>
      <el-col :span="20" style="height: 100%; overflow: auto;">
        <router-view></router-view>
      </el-col>
    </el-row>
  </div>
</template>

Vue (core library usage):

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'

const app = createApp(App)
app.mount('#app')

vue2-manage is a specific management system built with Vue 2, while Vue is the core framework itself. vue2-manage provides a ready-to-use admin interface, whereas Vue offers the foundation for building any type of web application. The code comparison shows the difference between a complex component in vue2-manage and the basic setup of a Vue 3 application.

Pros of element

• More comprehensive UI component library with a wider range of components
• Better documentation and examples for each component
• Larger community and more frequent updates

Cons of element

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially larger bundle size if not properly optimized

Code Comparison

element:

<el-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">Click me</el-button>
<el-input v-model="inputValue" placeholder="Enter text"></el-input>
<el-table :data="tableData">
  <el-table-column prop="name" label="Name"></el-table-column>
  <el-table-column prop="age" label="Age"></el-table-column>
</el-table>

vue2-manage:

<el-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">Click me</el-button>
<el-input v-model="inputValue" placeholder="Enter text"></el-input>
<el-table :data="tableData">
  <el-table-column prop="name" label="Name"></el-table-column>
  <el-table-column prop="age" label="Age"></el-table-column>
</el-table>

Summary

element is a more comprehensive UI library with better documentation and community support, while vue2-manage is a specific management system implementation. The code comparison shows that both projects use similar component syntax, as vue2-manage likely utilizes element as its UI framework. element offers more flexibility for various projects, while vue2-manage provides a ready-to-use management system structure.

Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wider range of components and functionalities
• Better documentation and community support, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions
• Regular updates and maintenance, ensuring compatibility with the latest Vue.js and Element UI versions

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler projects that don't require all the included features
• May require more customization effort to remove unnecessary components for smaller-scale applications

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/redirect',
    component: Layout,
    hidden: true,
    children: [
      {
        path: '/redirect/:path(.*)',
        component: () => import('@/views/redirect/index')
      }
    ]
  }
]

vue2-manage:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

const routes = [{
    path: '/',
    component: login
},{
    path: '/manage',
    component: manage,
    name: '',
    children: [{
        path: '',
        component: home,
        meta: [],
    }]
}]

The code comparison shows that vue-element-admin uses a more structured approach with constant routes and dynamic imports, while vue2-manage has a simpler routing configuration.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• More recent updates and active development
• Supports both Vue 2 and Vue 3 versions
• Includes more comprehensive documentation and examples

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Larger codebase, potentially more complex to understand and maintain
• Heavier reliance on third-party libraries and components

Code Comparison

vue2-manage:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store/'

Vue.config.productionTip = false;

vue-manage-system:

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'
import installElementPlus from './plugins/element'
import { usePermissionStore } from './store/modules/permission'

The vue-manage-system repository shows a more modern Vue 3 setup with composition API and modular imports, while vue2-manage uses the older Vue 2 syntax. vue-manage-system also includes additional imports for Element Plus and a custom permission store, indicating a more feature-rich implementation.

Both projects serve as admin dashboard templates for Vue.js applications, but vue-manage-system offers more up-to-date features and broader Vue version support. However, vue2-manage may be simpler and easier to grasp for beginners or those working with legacy Vue 2 projects.

Pros of iView

• More comprehensive UI component library with a wider range of components
• Better documentation and examples for developers
• Active community and regular updates

Cons of iView

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially larger bundle size if not properly optimized

Code Comparison

vue2-manage:

<template>
  <el-table :data="tableData" style="width: 100%">
    <el-table-column prop="date" label="Date" width="180"></el-table-column>
    <el-table-column prop="name" label="Name" width="180"></el-table-column>
    <el-table-column prop="address" label="Address"></el-table-column>
  </el-table>
</template>

iView:

<template>
  <Table :columns="columns" :data="data"></Table>
</template>
<script>
export default {
  data () {
    return {
      columns: [
        { title: 'Name', key: 'name' },
        { title: 'Age', key: 'age' },
        { title: 'Address', key: 'address' }
      ],
      data: [
        { name: 'John Brown', age: 18, address: 'New York No. 1 Lake Park' },
        { name: 'Jim Green', age: 24, address: 'London No. 1 Lake Park' },
        { name: 'Joe Black', age: 30, address: 'Sydney No. 1 Lake Park' }
      ]
    }
  }
}
</script>

The code comparison shows that iView's Table component offers a more concise and flexible approach to defining table structure and data, while vue2-manage uses Element UI's table component with a more explicit template structure.

Pros of ant-design-vue

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of pre-built components
• Active development and regular updates, ensuring compatibility with the latest Vue versions
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of ant-design-vue

• Larger bundle size due to the extensive component library
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Ant Design principles

Code Comparison

vue2-manage:

<el-table :data="tableData" style="width: 100%">
  <el-table-column prop="date" label="Date" width="180"></el-table-column>
  <el-table-column prop="name" label="Name" width="180"></el-table-column>
  <el-table-column prop="address" label="Address"></el-table-column>
</el-table>

ant-design-vue:

<a-table :dataSource="dataSource" :columns="columns">
  <a-table-column key="date" title="Date" dataIndex="date" />
  <a-table-column key="name" title="Name" dataIndex="name" />
  <a-table-column key="address" title="Address" dataIndex="address" />
</a-table>

Both repositories provide Vue-based admin interfaces, but ant-design-vue offers a more comprehensive set of components and better long-term support. However, vue2-manage may be simpler for small projects or developers who prefer a lightweight solution. The code comparison shows similar table implementations, with ant-design-vue using a slightly different syntax and component naming convention.