vuestic-admin

Pros of Vue

• Core framework with extensive ecosystem and community support
• Flexible and scalable for projects of any size
• Comprehensive documentation and learning resources

Cons of Vue

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Requires additional setup for admin dashboard functionality
• Less opinionated, requiring more decision-making for project structure

Code Comparison

Vue (basic component):

<template>
  <div>{{ message }}</div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      message: 'Hello Vue!'
    }
  }
}
</script>

Vuestic-admin (dashboard component):

<template>
  <va-card>
    <va-card-title>Dashboard</va-card-title>
    <va-card-content>
      <!-- Dashboard content -->
    </va-card-content>
  </va-card>
</template>

Summary

Vue is a versatile framework suitable for various project types, while Vuestic-admin is a pre-built admin dashboard solution based on Vue. Vue offers more flexibility and a broader ecosystem, but requires more setup for specific use cases. Vuestic-admin provides ready-to-use admin components and layouts, making it easier to create admin interfaces quickly, but with less customization options compared to building from scratch with Vue.

Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem, with more third-party plugins and extensions
• Includes advanced features like permission control and i18n out of the box

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler applications
• Less flexibility in terms of customization compared to vuestic-admin

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import permission from './permission'

Vue.use(permission)

// In a component
export default {
  permission: ['admin', 'editor']
}

vuestic-admin:

import { useGlobalConfig } from 'vuestic-ui'

const { getGlobalConfig } = useGlobalConfig()

// In a component
const isAdmin = getGlobalConfig().isUserAdmin

The code snippets demonstrate the difference in approach to permission handling. vue-element-admin uses a more structured plugin-based system, while vuestic-admin relies on global configuration and simpler checks.

vue-element-admin offers a more robust solution for complex applications with advanced permission requirements, whereas vuestic-admin provides a simpler and more lightweight approach that may be sufficient for many projects.

Pros of CoreUI Free Vue Admin Template

• More comprehensive documentation and guides
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Better integration with Bootstrap and support for Bootstrap utilities

Cons of CoreUI Free Vue Admin Template

• Less customizable design compared to Vuestic Admin
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• More opinionated structure, which may limit flexibility

Code Comparison

Vuestic Admin component example:

<va-card>
  <va-card-title>Card Title</va-card-title>
  <va-card-content>Content goes here</va-card-content>
</va-card>

CoreUI Free Vue Admin Template component example:

<CCard>
  <CCardHeader>Card Title</CCardHeader>
  <CCardBody>Content goes here</CCardBody>
</CCard>

Both templates use custom components for UI elements, but CoreUI follows a naming convention closer to Bootstrap's structure. Vuestic Admin's components are more abstracted and use a va- prefix.

Vuestic Admin tends to have more concise component names, while CoreUI's naming is more explicit about the component's purpose. This difference in naming conventions may affect code readability and developer preference.

Pros of ant-design-vue

• Larger community and more frequent updates
• More comprehensive component library
• Better documentation and examples

Cons of ant-design-vue

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive API
• Less customizable out-of-the-box compared to Vuestic Admin
• Heavier bundle size

Code Comparison

ant-design-vue:

<template>
  <a-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">
    Click me
  </a-button>
</template>

Vuestic Admin:

<template>
  <va-button color="primary" @click="handleClick">
    Click me
  </va-button>
</template>

Both libraries offer similar component usage, but ant-design-vue uses the a- prefix for its components, while Vuestic Admin uses va-. The ant-design-vue example uses type to set the button style, whereas Vuestic Admin uses color.

ant-design-vue provides a more extensive set of components and features, making it suitable for large-scale applications. However, this comes at the cost of a larger learning curve and bundle size. Vuestic Admin, while offering fewer components, provides a more streamlined and customizable experience out-of-the-box, making it ideal for smaller to medium-sized projects or those requiring a high degree of customization.

Pros of Bootstrap Vue

• Larger community and more extensive documentation
• Wider range of components and directives
• Better integration with existing Bootstrap projects

Cons of Bootstrap Vue

• Less customizable design out of the box
• Heavier bundle size due to full Bootstrap inclusion
• May require more manual styling for unique designs

Code Comparison

Bootstrap Vue:

<template>
  <b-container>
    <b-row>
      <b-col>
        <b-button variant="primary">Click me</b-button>
      </b-col>
    </b-row>
  </b-container>
</template>

Vuestic Admin:

<template>
  <va-card>
    <va-card-content>
      <va-button>Click me</va-button>
    </va-card-content>
  </va-card>
</template>

Bootstrap Vue uses Bootstrap-specific class names and components, while Vuestic Admin employs custom components with a more Vue-centric approach. Bootstrap Vue's syntax closely mirrors traditional Bootstrap, making it familiar to Bootstrap users. Vuestic Admin's components are more self-contained and may require less additional CSS for styling.

Both libraries offer responsive layouts and pre-styled components, but their approach to implementation differs. Bootstrap Vue leverages the existing Bootstrap ecosystem, while Vuestic Admin provides a more tailored Vue.js experience with its custom component library.