Pros of subconverter

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, supporting a wider range of subscription formats and conversion options
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and improvements
• Offers a web interface for easier configuration and usage

Cons of subconverter

• More complex setup and configuration process
• Requires more system resources due to its extensive features
• Steeper learning curve for new users

Code comparison

get_subscribe:

def parse_subscribe(sub_content):
    nodes = []
    for line in sub_content.splitlines():
        if line.startswith(('ss://', 'ssr://', 'vmess://')):
            nodes.append(line)
    return nodes

subconverter:

void Proxy::parse(const std::string &uri)
{
    std::string prefix = getUrlArg(uri, "scheme");
    if(prefix.empty())
        prefix = uri.substr(0, uri.find("://"));
    parser_map[prefix](*this, uri);
}

Summary

subconverter offers a more robust and feature-rich solution for subscription conversion, supporting a wider range of formats and providing a web interface. However, it comes with increased complexity and resource requirements. get_subscribe, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more lightweight approach, which may be sufficient for basic use cases but lacks the advanced features and flexibility of subconverter.

Pros of sub-web

• More active development with frequent updates and contributions
• Offers a user-friendly web interface for subscription management
• Supports multiple subscription formats and conversion between them

Cons of sub-web

• More complex setup and configuration required
• Larger codebase, potentially harder to maintain for individual users
• May have higher resource requirements due to its web-based nature

Code Comparison

get_subscribe:

def get_clash_config(url):
    resp = requests.get(url)
    yaml_str = resp.text
    yaml_dict = yaml.safe_load(yaml_str)
    return yaml_dict

sub-web:

async function getSubscription(url) {
  const response = await fetch(url);
  const text = await response.text();
  return yaml.safeLoad(text);
}

Both projects handle subscription retrieval, but sub-web uses modern JavaScript with async/await, while get_subscribe uses Python's requests library. sub-web's approach is more suitable for web-based applications, aligning with its overall design.

get_subscribe is a simpler, Python-based tool focused on fetching and processing subscriptions. It's easier to set up and use for basic needs but lacks the advanced features and user interface of sub-web.

sub-web, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive web-based solution for managing and converting subscriptions across various formats. It offers more flexibility and features but requires more setup and resources.

Pros of ACL4SSR

• More comprehensive rule sets for various applications and services
• Regularly updated with community contributions
• Includes pre-configured lists for popular platforms like Clash and Quantumult X

Cons of ACL4SSR

• Larger and more complex, potentially overwhelming for beginners
• May include unnecessary rules for some users' needs
• Requires more frequent updates to maintain effectiveness

Code Comparison

get_subscribe:

def get_clash_config(url):
    resp = requests.get(url)
    if resp.status_code != 200:
        return None
    return yaml.safe_load(resp.text)

ACL4SSR:

payload:
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googleapis.cn
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,googleapis.com
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.cn
  - DOMAIN-SUFFIX,google.com

The code snippets highlight the different approaches:

• get_subscribe focuses on fetching and parsing Clash configurations
• ACL4SSR provides pre-defined rule sets in YAML format

Both repositories serve different purposes in the realm of network rules and configurations. get_subscribe is more focused on obtaining and managing subscriptions, while ACL4SSR offers a comprehensive set of pre-defined rules for various scenarios and platforms.

Pros of Share-SSR-V2ray

• Larger collection of SSR and V2Ray resources
• More frequent updates and active community contributions
• Includes additional tools and tutorials for VPN setup

Cons of Share-SSR-V2ray

• Less automated, requires manual parsing of information
• May contain outdated or non-functional links
• Lacks built-in subscription generation features

Code Comparison

get_subscribe:

def get_subscribe(url):
    response = requests.get(url)
    if response.status_code == 200:
        return base64.b64decode(response.text).decode('utf-8')
    return None

Share-SSR-V2ray:

## SSR 订阅链接
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ssrsub/ssr/master/ssrsub
- https://www.liesauer.net/yogurt/subscribe?ACCESS_TOKEN=DAYxR3mMaZAsaqUb

The code comparison highlights the different approaches: get_subscribe uses Python to fetch and decode subscription data programmatically, while Share-SSR-V2ray provides raw subscription links in markdown format for manual use.

Pros of new-pac

• More comprehensive documentation and user guides
• Wider range of proxy configurations and protocols supported
• Regularly updated with new servers and connection methods

Cons of new-pac

• Less automated setup process
• Requires more manual configuration
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to numerous options

Code Comparison

new-pac:

def get_ss_link(server, port, password, method):
    ss_link = f"ss://{base64.urlsafe_b64encode(f'{method}:{password}'.encode()).decode()}@{server}:{port}"
    return ss_link

get_subscribe:

def get_ss_link(server, port, password, method):
    base64_str = base64.b64encode(f"{method}:{password}@{server}:{port}".encode()).decode()
    return f"ss://{base64_str}"

Both repositories aim to provide access to proxy servers and VPN configurations, but they differ in their approach and target audience. new-pac offers a more comprehensive set of options and configurations, making it suitable for advanced users who require fine-tuned control over their proxy settings. On the other hand, get_subscribe focuses on simplicity and automation, making it more accessible to users who prefer a straightforward setup process.

The code comparison shows that both projects implement similar functionality for generating SS links, with slight differences in the encoding process and string formatting. new-pac uses URL-safe base64 encoding, while get_subscribe uses standard base64 encoding.