kin-openapi
OpenAPI 3.0 (and Swagger v2) implementation for Go (parsing, converting, validation, and more)
Top Related Projects
The OpenAPI Specification Repository
Examples and server integrations for generating the Swagger API Specification, which enables easy access to your REST API
GUI / visual editor for creating and editing OpenAPI / Swagger definitions
Swagger 2.0 and OpenAPI 3.0 parser/validator
A flexible JSON/YAML linter for creating automated style guides, with baked in support for OpenAPI (v3.1, v3.0, and v2.0), Arazzo v1.0, as well as AsyncAPI v2.x.
Quick Overview
The getkin/kin-openapi repository is a Go package for handling OpenAPI (formerly known as Swagger) specifications. It provides tools for parsing, validating, and working with OpenAPI 3.0 and 3.1 documents, making it easier for developers to integrate OpenAPI functionality into their Go applications.
Pros
- Supports both OpenAPI 3.0 and 3.1 specifications
- Provides robust parsing and validation capabilities
- Offers a comprehensive set of tools for working with OpenAPI documents
- Actively maintained with regular updates and improvements
Cons
- Limited to Go language, not suitable for other programming environments
- May have a steeper learning curve for developers new to OpenAPI concepts
- Documentation could be more extensive, especially for advanced use cases
- Some users report occasional issues with complex OpenAPI specifications
Code Examples
- Parsing an OpenAPI document:
import (
"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3"
)
loader := openapi3.NewLoader()
doc, err := loader.LoadFromFile("path/to/openapi.yaml")
if err != nil {
// Handle error
}
- Validating an OpenAPI document:
err = doc.Validate(context.Background())
if err != nil {
// Handle validation error
}
- Accessing OpenAPI components:
schema := doc.Components.Schemas["User"]
path := doc.Paths["/users"]
operation := path.Get
- Serializing an OpenAPI document:
import (
"encoding/json"
)
jsonData, err := json.Marshal(doc)
if err != nil {
// Handle error
}
Getting Started
To use kin-openapi in your Go project, follow these steps:
-
Install the package:
go get github.com/getkin/kin-openapi
-
Import the required modules in your Go code:
import ( "github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3" "github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/routers" )
-
Start using the package to work with OpenAPI documents, as shown in the code examples above.
Competitor Comparisons
The OpenAPI Specification Repository
Pros of OpenAPI-Specification
- Official specification repository, providing the authoritative source for OpenAPI standards
- Extensive documentation and examples for implementing OpenAPI in various scenarios
- Large community support and regular updates to the specification
Cons of OpenAPI-Specification
- Focuses on the specification itself, not providing implementation tools or libraries
- May require additional resources for practical implementation in projects
Code Comparison
OpenAPI-Specification (YAML example):
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: Sample API
version: 1.0.0
paths:
/users:
get:
summary: Returns a list of users
kin-openapi (Go example):
swagger, err := openapi3.NewSwaggerLoader().LoadSwaggerFromFile("openapi.yaml")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Summary
OpenAPI-Specification is the official repository for the OpenAPI standard, offering comprehensive documentation and examples. It's ideal for understanding the specification but doesn't provide implementation tools. kin-openapi, on the other hand, is a Go library that offers practical tools for working with OpenAPI specifications, including parsing, validation, and manipulation of OpenAPI documents. While OpenAPI-Specification is essential for staying up-to-date with the standard, kin-openapi provides a more hands-on approach for developers working with OpenAPI in Go projects.
Examples and server integrations for generating the Swagger API Specification, which enables easy access to your REST API
Pros of swagger-core
- More comprehensive ecosystem with additional tools and integrations
- Stronger community support and wider adoption in enterprise environments
- Better documentation and extensive examples for various use cases
Cons of swagger-core
- Heavier and more complex, potentially overkill for smaller projects
- Steeper learning curve, especially for developers new to OpenAPI/Swagger
- Less flexible for custom extensions and modifications
Code Comparison
swagger-core:
@Path("/users")
@Api(value = "/users", description = "User management")
public class UserResource {
@GET
@ApiOperation(value = "Get all users", response = User.class, responseContainer = "List")
public Response getUsers() {
// Implementation
}
}
kin-openapi:
func main() {
swagger, err := openapi3.NewSwaggerLoader().LoadSwaggerFromFile("openapi.yaml")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
// Use the loaded OpenAPI specification
}
Summary
swagger-core offers a more robust ecosystem and better support for large-scale projects, while kin-openapi provides a lightweight and flexible alternative for Go developers. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, team expertise, and the desired level of customization.
GUI / visual editor for creating and editing OpenAPI / Swagger definitions
Pros of openapi-gui
- User-friendly graphical interface for creating and editing OpenAPI specifications
- Web-based tool, accessible from any browser without installation
- Supports real-time preview and validation of the OpenAPI document
Cons of openapi-gui
- Limited to OpenAPI v3.0 specifications, while kin-openapi supports multiple versions
- Less extensive validation and parsing capabilities compared to kin-openapi
- Not suitable for programmatic manipulation of OpenAPI documents
Code Comparison
kin-openapi (Go):
swagger, err := openapi3.NewSwaggerLoader().LoadSwaggerFromFile("openapi.yaml")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
openapi-gui (JavaScript):
fetch('openapi.yaml')
.then(response => response.text())
.then(yaml => {
editor.setValue(yaml);
});
Summary
openapi-gui is a web-based GUI tool for creating and editing OpenAPI specifications, offering a user-friendly interface and real-time preview. However, it has limitations in terms of version support and advanced functionality. kin-openapi, on the other hand, is a Go library for parsing and validating OpenAPI documents, providing more extensive capabilities for programmatic manipulation but lacking a graphical interface. The choice between the two depends on the specific use case and development requirements.
Swagger 2.0 and OpenAPI 3.0 parser/validator
Pros of swagger-parser
- More comprehensive parsing and validation capabilities for OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
- Supports both synchronous and asynchronous parsing methods
- Extensive documentation and examples available
Cons of swagger-parser
- Larger package size and potentially higher memory usage
- May have slower performance for simple parsing tasks
- Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to kin-openapi
Code Comparison
swagger-parser:
const SwaggerParser = require("swagger-parser");
SwaggerParser.validate("api.yaml", (err, api) => {
if (err) {
console.error(err);
} else {
console.log("API name: %s, Version: %s", api.info.title, api.info.version);
}
});
kin-openapi:
import "github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3"
loader := openapi3.NewLoader()
doc, err := loader.LoadFromFile("api.yaml")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Printf("API name: %s, Version: %s\n", doc.Info.Title, doc.Info.Version)
Both libraries offer parsing and validation capabilities for OpenAPI/Swagger specifications. swagger-parser provides more comprehensive features and supports both sync and async methods, but may have higher resource usage. kin-openapi is lighter and potentially faster for simple tasks, with more frequent updates. The choice depends on specific project requirements and language preferences.
A flexible JSON/YAML linter for creating automated style guides, with baked in support for OpenAPI (v3.1, v3.0, and v2.0), Arazzo v1.0, as well as AsyncAPI v2.x.
Pros of Spectral
- More flexible and customizable linting rules
- Supports multiple API description formats (OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, JSON Schema)
- Extensive documentation and community support
Cons of Spectral
- Steeper learning curve for complex custom rules
- May require more setup time for advanced configurations
Code Comparison
Spectral rule definition:
rules:
operation-description:
description: Operation must have a description.
given: $.paths[*][*]
then:
field: description
function: truthy
kin-openapi validation:
swagger, err := openapi3.NewSwaggerLoader().LoadSwaggerFromFile("openapi.yaml")
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Error:", err)
}
Key Differences
- Spectral focuses on linting and customizable rules, while kin-openapi is more oriented towards parsing and validation
- Spectral offers a CLI tool for easy integration, whereas kin-openapi is primarily used as a library
- kin-openapi provides stronger typing and Go-specific features, while Spectral is more language-agnostic
Use Cases
- Choose Spectral for flexible linting and rule customization across multiple API formats
- Opt for kin-openapi when working with Go projects and requiring strong typing for OpenAPI specifications
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
Introduction
A Go project for handling OpenAPI files. We target:
- OpenAPI
v2.0
(formerly known as Swagger) - OpenAPI
v3.0
- OpenAPI
v3.1
Soon! Tracking issue here.
Licensed under the MIT License.
Contributors, users and sponsors
The project has received pull requests from many people. Thanks to everyone!
Please, give back to this project by becoming a sponsor.
Here's some projects that depend on kin-openapi:
- github.com/go-fuego/fuego - "Framework generating OpenAPI 3 spec from source code"
- github.com/a-h/rest - "Generate OpenAPI 3.0 specifications from Go code without annotations or magic comments"
- github.com/Tufin/oasdiff - "A diff tool for OpenAPI Specification 3"
- github.com/danielgtaylor/apisprout - "Lightweight, blazing fast, cross-platform OpenAPI 3 mock server with validation"
- github.com/deepmap/oapi-codegen - "Generate Go client and server boilerplate from OpenAPI 3 specifications"
- github.com/dunglas/vulcain - "Use HTTP/2 Server Push to create fast and idiomatic client-driven REST APIs"
- github.com/danielgtaylor/restish - "...a CLI for interacting with REST-ish HTTP APIs with some nice features built-in"
- github.com/goadesign/goa - "Design-based APIs and microservices in Go"
- github.com/hashicorp/nomad-openapi - "Nomad is an easy-to-use, flexible, and performant workload orchestrator that can deploy a mix of microservice, batch, containerized, and non-containerized applications. Nomad is easy to operate and scale and has native Consul and Vault integrations."
- gitlab.com/jamietanna/httptest-openapi (blog post) - "Go OpenAPI Contract Verification for use with
net/http
" - github.com/SIMITGROUP/openapigenerator - "Openapi v3 microservices generator"
- https://github.com/projectsveltos/addon-controller - "Kubernetes add-on controller designed to manage tens of clusters."
- (Feel free to add your project by creating an issue or a pull request)
Alternatives
- libopenapi a fully featured, high performance OpenAPI 3.1, 3.0 and Swagger parser, library, validator and toolkit
- go-swagger stated OpenAPIv3 won't be supported
- swaggo has an open issue on OpenAPIv3
- go-openapi's spec3
Be sure to check OpenAPI Initiative's great tooling list as well as OpenAPI.Tools.
Structure
- openapi2 (godoc)
- Support for OpenAPI 2 files, including serialization, deserialization, and validation.
- openapi2conv (godoc)
- Converts OpenAPI 2 files into OpenAPI 3 files.
- openapi3 (godoc)
- Support for OpenAPI 3 files, including serialization, deserialization, and validation.
- openapi3filter (godoc)
- Validates HTTP requests and responses
- Provides a gorilla/mux router for OpenAPI operations
- openapi3gen (godoc)
- Generates
*openapi3.Schema
values for Go types.
- Generates
Some recipes
Validating an OpenAPI document
go run github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/cmd/validate@latest [--circular] [--defaults] [--examples] [--ext] [--patterns] -- <local YAML or JSON file>
Loading OpenAPI document
Use openapi3.Loader
, which resolves all references:
loader := openapi3.NewLoader()
doc, err := loader.LoadFromFile("my-openapi-spec.json")
Getting OpenAPI operation that matches request
loader := openapi3.NewLoader()
doc, _ := loader.LoadFromData([]byte(`...`))
_ = doc.Validate(loader.Context)
router, _ := gorillamux.NewRouter(doc)
route, pathParams, _ := router.FindRoute(httpRequest)
// Do something with route.Operation
Validating HTTP requests/responses
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"net/http"
"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3"
"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter"
"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/routers/gorillamux"
)
func main() {
ctx := context.Background()
loader := &openapi3.Loader{Context: ctx, IsExternalRefsAllowed: true}
doc, _ := loader.LoadFromFile(".../My-OpenAPIv3-API.yml")
// Validate document
_ = doc.Validate(ctx)
router, _ := gorillamux.NewRouter(doc)
httpReq, _ := http.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "/items", nil)
// Find route
route, pathParams, _ := router.FindRoute(httpReq)
// Validate request
requestValidationInput := &openapi3filter.RequestValidationInput{
Request: httpReq,
PathParams: pathParams,
Route: route,
}
_ = openapi3filter.ValidateRequest(ctx, requestValidationInput)
// Handle that request
// --> YOUR CODE GOES HERE <--
responseHeaders := http.Header{"Content-Type": []string{"application/json"}}
responseCode := 200
responseBody := []byte(`{}`)
// Validate response
responseValidationInput := &openapi3filter.ResponseValidationInput{
RequestValidationInput: requestValidationInput,
Status: responseCode,
Header: responseHeaders,
}
responseValidationInput.SetBodyBytes(responseBody)
_ = openapi3filter.ValidateResponse(ctx, responseValidationInput)
}
Custom content type for body of HTTP request/response
By default, the library parses a body of the HTTP request and response
if it has one of the following content types: "text/plain"
or "application/json"
.
To support other content types you must register decoders for them:
func main() {
// ...
// Register a body's decoder for content type "application/xml".
openapi3filter.RegisterBodyDecoder("application/xml", xmlBodyDecoder)
// Now you can validate HTTP request that contains a body with content type "application/xml".
requestValidationInput := &openapi3filter.RequestValidationInput{
Request: httpReq,
PathParams: pathParams,
Route: route,
}
if err := openapi3filter.ValidateRequest(ctx, requestValidationInput); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
// ...
// And you can validate HTTP response that contains a body with content type "application/xml".
if err := openapi3filter.ValidateResponse(ctx, responseValidationInput); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
}
func xmlBodyDecoder(body io.Reader, h http.Header, schema *openapi3.SchemaRef, encFn openapi3filter.EncodingFn) (decoded any, err error) {
// Decode body to a primitive, []any, or map[string]any.
}
Custom function to check uniqueness of array items
By default, the library checks unique items using the following predefined function:
func isSliceOfUniqueItems(xs []any) bool {
s := len(xs)
m := make(map[string]struct{}, s)
for _, x := range xs {
key, _ := json.Marshal(&x)
m[string(key)] = struct{}{}
}
return s == len(m)
}
In the predefined function json.Marshal
is used to generate a string that can
be used as a map key which is to check the uniqueness of an array
when the array items are objects or arrays. You can register
you own function according to your input data to get better performance:
func main() {
// ...
// Register a customized function used to check uniqueness of array.
openapi3.RegisterArrayUniqueItemsChecker(arrayUniqueItemsChecker)
// ... other validate codes
}
func arrayUniqueItemsChecker(items []any) bool {
// Check the uniqueness of the input slice
}
Custom function to change schema error messages
By default, the error message returned when validating a value includes the error reason, the schema, and the input value.
For example, given the following schema:
{
"type": "string",
"allOf": [
{ "pattern": "[A-Z]" },
{ "pattern": "[a-z]" },
{ "pattern": "[0-9]" },
{ "pattern": "[!@#$%^&*()_+=-?~]" }
]
}
Passing the input value "secret"
to this schema will produce the following error message:
string doesn't match the regular expression "[A-Z]"
Schema:
{
"pattern": "[A-Z]"
}
Value:
"secret"
Including the original value in the error message can be helpful for debugging, but it may not be appropriate for sensitive information such as secrets.
To disable the extra details in the schema error message, you can set the openapi3.SchemaErrorDetailsDisabled
option to true
:
func main() {
// ...
// Disable schema error detailed error messages
openapi3.SchemaErrorDetailsDisabled = true
// ... other validate codes
}
This will shorten the error message to present only the reason:
string doesn't match the regular expression "[A-Z]"
For more fine-grained control over the error message, you can pass a custom openapi3filter.Options
object to openapi3filter.RequestValidationInput
that includes a openapi3filter.CustomSchemaErrorFunc
.
func validationOptions() *openapi3filter.Options {
options := &openapi3filter.Options{}
options.WithCustomSchemaErrorFunc(safeErrorMessage)
return options
}
func safeErrorMessage(err *openapi3.SchemaError) string {
return err.Reason
}
This will change the schema validation errors to return only the Reason
field, which is guaranteed to not include the original value.
Reconciling component $ref types
ReferencesComponentInRootDocument
is a useful helper function to check if a component reference
coincides with a reference in the root document's component objects fixed fields.
This can be used to determine if two schema definitions are of the same structure, helpful for code generation tools when generating go type models.
doc, err = loader.LoadFromFile("openapi.yml")
for _, path := range doc.Paths.InMatchingOrder() {
pathItem := doc.Paths.Find(path)
if pathItem.Get == nil || pathItem.Get.Responses.Status(200) {
continue
}
for _, s := range pathItem.Get.Responses.Status(200).Value.Content {
name, match := ReferencesComponentInRootDocument(doc, s.Schema)
fmt.Println(path, match, name) // /record true #/components/schemas/BookRecord
}
}
CHANGELOG: Sub-v1 breaking API changes
v0.129.0
openapi3.Discriminator.Mapping
andopenapi3.OAuthFlow.Scopes
fields went from amap[string]string
to the new typeStringMap
v0.127.0
- Downgraded
github.com/gorilla/mux
dep from1.8.1
to1.8.0
.
v0.126.0
openapi3.CircularReferenceError
andopenapi3.CircularReferenceCounter
are removed.openapi3.Loader
now implements reference backtracking, so any kind of circular references should be properly resolved.InternalizeRefs
now takes a refNameResolver that has access toopenapi3.T
and more properties of the reference needing resolving.- The
DefaultRefNameResolver
has been updated, choosing names that will be less likely to collide with each other. Because of this internalized specs will likely change slightly. openapi3.Format
andopenapi3.FormatCallback
are removed and the type ofopenapi3.SchemaStringFormats
has changed.
v0.125.0
- The
openapi3filter.ErrFunc
andopenapi3filter.LogFunc
func types now take the validated request's context as first argument.
v0.124.0
openapi3.Schema.Type
&openapi2.Parameter.Type
fields went from astring
to the type*Type
with methods:Includes
,Is
,Permits
&Slice
.
v0.122.0
Paths
field ofopenapi3.T
is now a pointerResponses
field ofopenapi3.Operation
is now a pointeropenapi3.Paths
went frommap[string]*PathItem
to a struct with anExtensions
field and methods:Set
,Value
,Len
,Map
, andNew*
.openapi3.Callback
went frommap[string]*PathItem
to a struct with anExtensions
field and methods:Set
,Value
,Len
,Map
, andNew*
.openapi3.Responses
went frommap[string]*ResponseRef
to a struct with anExtensions
field and methods:Set
,Value
,Len
,Map
, andNew*
.(openapi3.Responses).Get(int)
renamed to(*openapi3.Responses).Status(int)
v0.121.0
- Introduce
openapi3.RequestBodies
(an alias onmap[string]*openapi3.ResponseRef
) and use it in place ofopenapi3.Responses
for fieldopenapi3.Components.Responses
.
v0.116.0
- Dropped
openapi3filter.DefaultOptions
. Use&openapi3filter.Options{}
directly instead.
v0.113.0
- The string format
email
has been removed by default. To use it please callopenapi3.DefineStringFormat("email", openapi3.FormatOfStringForEmail)
. - Field
openapi3.T.Components
is now a pointer. - Fields
openapi3.Schema.AdditionalProperties
andopenapi3.Schema.AdditionalPropertiesAllowed
are replaced byopenapi3.Schema.AdditionalProperties.Schema
andopenapi3.Schema.AdditionalProperties.Has
respectively. - Type
openapi3.ExtensionProps
is now justmap[string]any
and extensions are accessible through theExtensions
field.
v0.112.0
(openapi3.ValidationOptions).ExamplesValidationDisabled
has been unexported.(openapi3.ValidationOptions).SchemaFormatValidationEnabled
has been unexported.(openapi3.ValidationOptions).SchemaPatternValidationDisabled
has been unexported.
v0.111.0
- Changed
func (*_) Validate(ctx context.Context) error
tofunc (*_) Validate(ctx context.Context, opts ...ValidationOption) error
. openapi3.WithValidationOptions(ctx context.Context, opts *ValidationOptions) context.Context
prototype changed toopenapi3.WithValidationOptions(ctx context.Context, opts ...ValidationOption) context.Context
.
v0.101.0
openapi3.SchemaFormatValidationDisabled
has been removed in favour of an optionopenapi3.EnableSchemaFormatValidation()
passed toopenapi3.T.Validate
. The default behaviour is also now to not validate formats, as the OpenAPI spec mentions theformat
is an open value.
v0.84.0
- The prototype of
openapi3gen.NewSchemaRefForValue
changed:- It no longer returns a map but that is still accessible under the field
(*Generator).SchemaRefs
. - It now takes in an additional argument (basically
doc.Components.Schemas
) which gets written to so$ref
cycles can be properly handled.
- It no longer returns a map but that is still accessible under the field
v0.61.0
- Renamed
openapi2.Swagger
toopenapi2.T
. - Renamed
openapi2conv.FromV3Swagger
toopenapi2conv.FromV3
. - Renamed
openapi2conv.ToV3Swagger
toopenapi2conv.ToV3
. - Renamed
openapi3.LoadSwaggerFromData
toopenapi3.LoadFromData
. - Renamed
openapi3.LoadSwaggerFromDataWithPath
toopenapi3.LoadFromDataWithPath
. - Renamed
openapi3.LoadSwaggerFromFile
toopenapi3.LoadFromFile
. - Renamed
openapi3.LoadSwaggerFromURI
toopenapi3.LoadFromURI
. - Renamed
openapi3.NewSwaggerLoader
toopenapi3.NewLoader
. - Renamed
openapi3.Swagger
toopenapi3.T
. - Renamed
openapi3.SwaggerLoader
toopenapi3.Loader
. - Renamed
openapi3filter.ValidationHandler.SwaggerFile
toopenapi3filter.ValidationHandler.File
. - Renamed
routers.Route.Swagger
torouters.Route.Spec
.
v0.51.0
- Type
openapi3filter.Route
moved torouters
(andRoute.Handler
was dropped. See https://github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/issues/329) - Type
openapi3filter.RouteError
moved torouters
(so didErrPathNotFound
andErrMethodNotAllowed
which are nowRouteError
s) - Routers'
FindRoute(...)
method now takes only one argument:*http.Request
getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter.Router
moved togetkin/kin-openapi/routers/legacy
openapi3filter.NewRouter()
and its relatedWithSwaggerFromFile(string)
,WithSwagger(*openapi3.Swagger)
,AddSwaggerFromFile(string)
andAddSwagger(*openapi3.Swagger)
are all replaced with a single<router package>.NewRouter(*openapi3.Swagger)
- NOTE: the
NewRouter(doc)
call now requires that the user ensuresdoc
is valid (doc.Validate() != nil
). This used to be asserted.
- NOTE: the
v0.47.0
Field (*openapi3.SwaggerLoader).LoadSwaggerFromURIFunc
of type func(*openapi3.SwaggerLoader, *url.URL) (*openapi3.Swagger, error)
was removed after the addition of the field (*openapi3.SwaggerLoader).ReadFromURIFunc
of type func(*openapi3.SwaggerLoader, *url.URL) ([]byte, error)
.
Top Related Projects
The OpenAPI Specification Repository
Examples and server integrations for generating the Swagger API Specification, which enables easy access to your REST API
GUI / visual editor for creating and editing OpenAPI / Swagger definitions
Swagger 2.0 and OpenAPI 3.0 parser/validator
A flexible JSON/YAML linter for creating automated style guides, with baked in support for OpenAPI (v3.1, v3.0, and v2.0), Arazzo v1.0, as well as AsyncAPI v2.x.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot