Top Related Projects
Package gorilla/mux is a powerful HTTP router and URL matcher for building Go web servers with 🦍
Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin.
High performance, minimalist Go web framework
A high performance HTTP request router that scales well
⚡️ Express inspired web framework written in Go
Fast HTTP package for Go. Tuned for high performance. Zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 10x faster than net/http
Quick Overview
Chi is a lightweight, idiomatic, and composable router for building Go HTTP services. It's built on top of the standard net/http package and is designed to be fast, flexible, and easy to use. Chi encourages clean, modular, and maintainable code by providing a simple yet powerful routing system.
Pros
- Lightweight and has zero external dependencies
- Highly performant and optimized for real-world workloads
- Supports middleware chaining and composable routing
- Compatible with net/http standard library
Cons
- Less feature-rich compared to some full-fledged web frameworks
- May require additional libraries for more complex web applications
- Learning curve for developers new to Go's HTTP patterns
Code Examples
- Basic router setup:
package main
import (
"net/http"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
)
func main() {
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("Welcome"))
})
http.ListenAndServe(":3000", r)
}
- Using URL parameters:
r.Get("/users/{id}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
userID := chi.URLParam(r, "id")
w.Write([]byte("User ID: " + userID))
})
- Middleware example:
func Logger(next http.Handler) http.Handler {
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
fmt.Println("Logged request:", r.URL.Path)
next.ServeHTTP(w, r)
})
}
r.Use(Logger)
Getting Started
To start using Chi, first install it:
go get -u github.com/go-chi/chi/v5
Then, create a basic server:
package main
import (
"net/http"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware"
)
func main() {
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Use(middleware.Logger)
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("Hello, World!"))
})
http.ListenAndServe(":3000", r)
}
This sets up a simple Chi router with logging middleware and a single route that responds with "Hello, World!" when accessed at the root URL.
Competitor Comparisons
Package gorilla/mux is a powerful HTTP router and URL matcher for building Go web servers with 🦍
Pros of mux
- More mature and widely adopted in the Go community
- Extensive documentation and examples available
- Built-in support for URL path variables and subrouters
Cons of mux
- Slightly more verbose routing syntax
- Performance may be slightly lower in high-load scenarios
- Less actively maintained compared to chi
Code Comparison
mux:
r := mux.NewRouter()
r.HandleFunc("/users/{id}", GetUser).Methods("GET")
r.HandleFunc("/users", CreateUser).Methods("POST")
chi:
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/users/{id}", GetUser)
r.Post("/users", CreateUser)
Key Differences
- chi offers a more concise routing syntax
- mux provides built-in support for HTTP methods in route definitions
- chi focuses on simplicity and performance
- mux offers more features out of the box
Both mux and chi are popular routing libraries for Go, with mux being more established and feature-rich, while chi emphasizes simplicity and performance. The choice between them often depends on specific project requirements and personal preferences.
Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin.
Pros of Gin
- Higher performance due to custom routing algorithm
- Built-in middleware and features like logging, recovery, and JSON validation
- Extensive documentation and large community support
Cons of Gin
- More opinionated and less flexible than Chi
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Heavier dependency footprint
Code Comparison
Chi:
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("welcome"))
})
Gin:
r := gin.Default()
r.GET("/", func(c *gin.Context) {
c.String(http.StatusOK, "welcome")
})
Summary
Chi and Gin are both popular Go web frameworks, but they have different philosophies. Chi focuses on simplicity and flexibility, adhering closely to the standard library's http.Handler
interface. Gin, on the other hand, offers more built-in features and higher performance at the cost of a steeper learning curve and less flexibility.
Chi is ideal for developers who prefer a minimalist approach and want to maintain full control over their application's structure. Gin is better suited for projects that require high performance and can benefit from its extensive built-in features.
The choice between Chi and Gin ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your project and your personal preferences as a developer.
High performance, minimalist Go web framework
Pros of Echo
- Built-in middleware for common tasks like CORS, JWT, and rate limiting
- Automatic API documentation generation with Swagger
- Extensive and well-organized documentation
Cons of Echo
- Larger codebase and more dependencies
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Less flexibility for custom routing patterns
Code Comparison
Echo:
e := echo.New()
e.GET("/", func(c echo.Context) error {
return c.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello, World!")
})
e.Logger.Fatal(e.Start(":1323"))
Chi:
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("Hello, World!"))
})
http.ListenAndServe(":3000", r)
Both Echo and Chi are popular Go web frameworks, but they have different design philosophies. Echo focuses on providing a full-featured, batteries-included approach with built-in middleware and tools. Chi, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and follows Go's standard library patterns more closely.
Echo's extensive feature set and middleware ecosystem make it attractive for larger projects or those requiring quick development of complex APIs. However, this comes at the cost of a larger codebase and potentially more overhead.
Chi's minimalist approach allows for greater flexibility and easier integration with existing Go code. It's often preferred for smaller projects or by developers who want more control over their application's structure. The trade-off is that developers may need to implement or integrate additional functionality themselves.
A high performance HTTP request router that scales well
Pros of httprouter
- Extremely fast and lightweight, optimized for high performance
- Simple API with minimal learning curve
- Supports named parameters and catch-all routes
Cons of httprouter
- Limited middleware support
- Less flexible routing patterns compared to chi
- Fewer built-in features for complex applications
Code Comparison
httprouter:
router := httprouter.New()
router.GET("/user/:name", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, ps httprouter.Params) {
fmt.Fprintf(w, "hello, %s!\n", ps.ByName("name"))
})
chi:
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/user/{name}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
name := chi.URLParam(r, "name")
fmt.Fprintf(w, "hello, %s!\n", name)
})
Key Differences
- httprouter uses a custom
Params
type for route parameters, while chi integrates with the standardhttp.Request
- chi offers more middleware and routing options, making it suitable for larger applications
- httprouter focuses on simplicity and performance, making it ideal for smaller projects or microservices
Both routers are popular choices in the Go community, with httprouter being favored for its speed and simplicity, while chi is preferred for its flexibility and feature set.
⚡️ Express inspired web framework written in Go
Pros of Fiber
- Extremely fast performance, often benchmarking higher than Chi
- Built-in support for WebSocket, prefork, and server-side events
- More extensive feature set out-of-the-box, including templating and middleware
Cons of Fiber
- Larger dependency footprint due to its feature-rich nature
- Not fully compatible with net/http, which may limit integration with some standard library features
- Steeper learning curve for developers familiar with standard Go HTTP patterns
Code Comparison
Chi:
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("Welcome"))
})
http.ListenAndServe(":3000", r)
Fiber:
app := fiber.New()
app.Get("/", func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
return c.SendString("Welcome")
})
app.Listen(":3000")
Both Chi and Fiber are popular Go web frameworks, each with its own strengths. Chi focuses on simplicity and standard library compatibility, while Fiber emphasizes performance and feature richness. The choice between them often depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences.
Fast HTTP package for Go. Tuned for high performance. Zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 10x faster than net/http
Pros of fasthttp
- Significantly higher performance and lower memory usage
- Built-in support for HTTP/1.1 pipelining and keep-alive connections
- Optimized for high-load scenarios and microservices
Cons of fasthttp
- Less compatible with net/http standard library
- Steeper learning curve due to its non-standard API
- Limited middleware ecosystem compared to chi
Code Comparison
fasthttp:
func requestHandler(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) {
fmt.Fprintf(ctx, "Hello, world!")
}
fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8080", requestHandler)
chi:
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("Hello, world!"))
})
http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r)
fasthttp focuses on raw performance, sacrificing some compatibility and ease of use. It's ideal for high-load scenarios where every microsecond counts. chi, on the other hand, provides a more familiar API that's compatible with net/http, making it easier to integrate with existing Go ecosystems and middleware. chi offers a good balance between performance and developer-friendly features, while fasthttp pushes the boundaries of HTTP performance at the cost of some convenience.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
chi
is a lightweight, idiomatic and composable router for building Go HTTP services. It's
especially good at helping you write large REST API services that are kept maintainable as your
project grows and changes. chi
is built on the new context
package introduced in Go 1.7 to
handle signaling, cancelation and request-scoped values across a handler chain.
The focus of the project has been to seek out an elegant and comfortable design for writing REST API servers, written during the development of the Pressly API service that powers our public API service, which in turn powers all of our client-side applications.
The key considerations of chi's design are: project structure, maintainability, standard http
handlers (stdlib-only), developer productivity, and deconstructing a large system into many small
parts. The core router github.com/go-chi/chi
is quite small (less than 1000 LOC), but we've also
included some useful/optional subpackages: middleware, render
and docgen. We hope you enjoy it too!
Install
go get -u github.com/go-chi/chi/v5
Features
- Lightweight - cloc'd in ~1000 LOC for the chi router
- Fast - yes, see benchmarks
- 100% compatible with net/http - use any http or middleware pkg in the ecosystem that is also compatible with
net/http
- Designed for modular/composable APIs - middlewares, inline middlewares, route groups and sub-router mounting
- Context control - built on new
context
package, providing value chaining, cancellations and timeouts - Robust - in production at Pressly, Cloudflare, Heroku, 99Designs, and many others (see discussion)
- Doc generation -
docgen
auto-generates routing documentation from your source to JSON or Markdown - Go.mod support - as of v5, go.mod support (see CHANGELOG)
- No external dependencies - plain ol' Go stdlib + net/http
Examples
See _examples/ for a variety of examples.
As easy as:
package main
import (
"net/http"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware"
)
func main() {
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Use(middleware.Logger)
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("welcome"))
})
http.ListenAndServe(":3000", r)
}
REST Preview:
Here is a little preview of what routing looks like with chi. Also take a look at the generated routing docs in JSON (routes.json) and in Markdown (routes.md).
I highly recommend reading the source of the examples listed above, they will show you all the features of chi and serve as a good form of documentation.
import (
//...
"context"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"
"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware"
)
func main() {
r := chi.NewRouter()
// A good base middleware stack
r.Use(middleware.RequestID)
r.Use(middleware.RealIP)
r.Use(middleware.Logger)
r.Use(middleware.Recoverer)
// Set a timeout value on the request context (ctx), that will signal
// through ctx.Done() that the request has timed out and further
// processing should be stopped.
r.Use(middleware.Timeout(60 * time.Second))
r.Get("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Write([]byte("hi"))
})
// RESTy routes for "articles" resource
r.Route("/articles", func(r chi.Router) {
r.With(paginate).Get("/", listArticles) // GET /articles
r.With(paginate).Get("/{month}-{day}-{year}", listArticlesByDate) // GET /articles/01-16-2017
r.Post("/", createArticle) // POST /articles
r.Get("/search", searchArticles) // GET /articles/search
// Regexp url parameters:
r.Get("/{articleSlug:[a-z-]+}", getArticleBySlug) // GET /articles/home-is-toronto
// Subrouters:
r.Route("/{articleID}", func(r chi.Router) {
r.Use(ArticleCtx)
r.Get("/", getArticle) // GET /articles/123
r.Put("/", updateArticle) // PUT /articles/123
r.Delete("/", deleteArticle) // DELETE /articles/123
})
})
// Mount the admin sub-router
r.Mount("/admin", adminRouter())
http.ListenAndServe(":3333", r)
}
func ArticleCtx(next http.Handler) http.Handler {
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
articleID := chi.URLParam(r, "articleID")
article, err := dbGetArticle(articleID)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, http.StatusText(404), 404)
return
}
ctx := context.WithValue(r.Context(), "article", article)
next.ServeHTTP(w, r.WithContext(ctx))
})
}
func getArticle(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
ctx := r.Context()
article, ok := ctx.Value("article").(*Article)
if !ok {
http.Error(w, http.StatusText(422), 422)
return
}
w.Write([]byte(fmt.Sprintf("title:%s", article.Title)))
}
// A completely separate router for administrator routes
func adminRouter() http.Handler {
r := chi.NewRouter()
r.Use(AdminOnly)
r.Get("/", adminIndex)
r.Get("/accounts", adminListAccounts)
return r
}
func AdminOnly(next http.Handler) http.Handler {
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
ctx := r.Context()
perm, ok := ctx.Value("acl.permission").(YourPermissionType)
if !ok || !perm.IsAdmin() {
http.Error(w, http.StatusText(403), 403)
return
}
next.ServeHTTP(w, r)
})
}
Router interface
chi's router is based on a kind of Patricia Radix trie.
The router is fully compatible with net/http
.
Built on top of the tree is the Router
interface:
// Router consisting of the core routing methods used by chi's Mux,
// using only the standard net/http.
type Router interface {
http.Handler
Routes
// Use appends one or more middlewares onto the Router stack.
Use(middlewares ...func(http.Handler) http.Handler)
// With adds inline middlewares for an endpoint handler.
With(middlewares ...func(http.Handler) http.Handler) Router
// Group adds a new inline-Router along the current routing
// path, with a fresh middleware stack for the inline-Router.
Group(fn func(r Router)) Router
// Route mounts a sub-Router along a `pattern`` string.
Route(pattern string, fn func(r Router)) Router
// Mount attaches another http.Handler along ./pattern/*
Mount(pattern string, h http.Handler)
// Handle and HandleFunc adds routes for `pattern` that matches
// all HTTP methods.
Handle(pattern string, h http.Handler)
HandleFunc(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
// Method and MethodFunc adds routes for `pattern` that matches
// the `method` HTTP method.
Method(method, pattern string, h http.Handler)
MethodFunc(method, pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
// HTTP-method routing along `pattern`
Connect(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Delete(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Get(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Head(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Options(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Patch(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Post(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Put(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
Trace(pattern string, h http.HandlerFunc)
// NotFound defines a handler to respond whenever a route could
// not be found.
NotFound(h http.HandlerFunc)
// MethodNotAllowed defines a handler to respond whenever a method is
// not allowed.
MethodNotAllowed(h http.HandlerFunc)
}
// Routes interface adds two methods for router traversal, which is also
// used by the github.com/go-chi/docgen package to generate documentation for Routers.
type Routes interface {
// Routes returns the routing tree in an easily traversable structure.
Routes() []Route
// Middlewares returns the list of middlewares in use by the router.
Middlewares() Middlewares
// Match searches the routing tree for a handler that matches
// the method/path - similar to routing a http request, but without
// executing the handler thereafter.
Match(rctx *Context, method, path string) bool
}
Each routing method accepts a URL pattern
and chain of handlers
. The URL pattern
supports named params (ie. /users/{userID}
) and wildcards (ie. /admin/*
). URL parameters
can be fetched at runtime by calling chi.URLParam(r, "userID")
for named parameters
and chi.URLParam(r, "*")
for a wildcard parameter.
Middleware handlers
chi's middlewares are just stdlib net/http middleware handlers. There is nothing special about them, which means the router and all the tooling is designed to be compatible and friendly with any middleware in the community. This offers much better extensibility and reuse of packages and is at the heart of chi's purpose.
Here is an example of a standard net/http middleware where we assign a context key "user"
the value of "123"
. This middleware sets a hypothetical user identifier on the request
context and calls the next handler in the chain.
// HTTP middleware setting a value on the request context
func MyMiddleware(next http.Handler) http.Handler {
return http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
// create new context from `r` request context, and assign key `"user"`
// to value of `"123"`
ctx := context.WithValue(r.Context(), "user", "123")
// call the next handler in the chain, passing the response writer and
// the updated request object with the new context value.
//
// note: context.Context values are nested, so any previously set
// values will be accessible as well, and the new `"user"` key
// will be accessible from this point forward.
next.ServeHTTP(w, r.WithContext(ctx))
})
}
Request handlers
chi uses standard net/http request handlers. This little snippet is an example of a http.Handler func that reads a user identifier from the request context - hypothetically, identifying the user sending an authenticated request, validated+set by a previous middleware handler.
// HTTP handler accessing data from the request context.
func MyRequestHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
// here we read from the request context and fetch out `"user"` key set in
// the MyMiddleware example above.
user := r.Context().Value("user").(string)
// respond to the client
w.Write([]byte(fmt.Sprintf("hi %s", user)))
}
URL parameters
chi's router parses and stores URL parameters right onto the request context. Here is an example of how to access URL params in your net/http handlers. And of course, middlewares are able to access the same information.
// HTTP handler accessing the url routing parameters.
func MyRequestHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
// fetch the url parameter `"userID"` from the request of a matching
// routing pattern. An example routing pattern could be: /users/{userID}
userID := chi.URLParam(r, "userID")
// fetch `"key"` from the request context
ctx := r.Context()
key := ctx.Value("key").(string)
// respond to the client
w.Write([]byte(fmt.Sprintf("hi %v, %v", userID, key)))
}
Middlewares
chi comes equipped with an optional middleware
package, providing a suite of standard
net/http
middlewares. Please note, any middleware in the ecosystem that is also compatible
with net/http
can be used with chi's mux.
Core middlewares
chi/middleware Handler | description |
---|---|
AllowContentEncoding | Enforces a whitelist of request Content-Encoding headers |
AllowContentType | Explicit whitelist of accepted request Content-Types |
BasicAuth | Basic HTTP authentication |
Compress | Gzip compression for clients that accept compressed responses |
ContentCharset | Ensure charset for Content-Type request headers |
CleanPath | Clean double slashes from request path |
GetHead | Automatically route undefined HEAD requests to GET handlers |
Heartbeat | Monitoring endpoint to check the servers pulse |
Logger | Logs the start and end of each request with the elapsed processing time |
NoCache | Sets response headers to prevent clients from caching |
Profiler | Easily attach net/http/pprof to your routers |
RealIP | Sets a http.Request's RemoteAddr to either X-Real-IP or X-Forwarded-For |
Recoverer | Gracefully absorb panics and prints the stack trace |
RequestID | Injects a request ID into the context of each request |
RedirectSlashes | Redirect slashes on routing paths |
RouteHeaders | Route handling for request headers |
SetHeader | Short-hand middleware to set a response header key/value |
StripSlashes | Strip slashes on routing paths |
Sunset | Sunset set Deprecation/Sunset header to response |
Throttle | Puts a ceiling on the number of concurrent requests |
Timeout | Signals to the request context when the timeout deadline is reached |
URLFormat | Parse extension from url and put it on request context |
WithValue | Short-hand middleware to set a key/value on the request context |
Extra middlewares & packages
Please see https://github.com/go-chi for additional packages.
package | description |
---|---|
cors | Cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) |
docgen | Print chi.Router routes at runtime |
jwtauth | JWT authentication |
hostrouter | Domain/host based request routing |
httplog | Small but powerful structured HTTP request logging |
httprate | HTTP request rate limiter |
httptracer | HTTP request performance tracing library |
httpvcr | Write deterministic tests for external sources |
stampede | HTTP request coalescer |
context?
context
is a tiny pkg that provides simple interface to signal context across call stacks
and goroutines. It was originally written by Sameer Ajmani
and is available in stdlib since go1.7.
Learn more at https://blog.golang.org/context
and..
Benchmarks
The benchmark suite: https://github.com/pkieltyka/go-http-routing-benchmark
Results as of Nov 29, 2020 with Go 1.15.5 on Linux AMD 3950x
BenchmarkChi_Param 3075895 384 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_Param5 2116603 566 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_Param20 964117 1227 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_ParamWrite 2863413 420 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GithubStatic 3045488 395 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GithubParam 2204115 540 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GithubAll 10000 113811 ns/op 81203 B/op 406 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GPlusStatic 3337485 359 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GPlusParam 2825853 423 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GPlus2Params 2471697 483 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_GPlusAll 194220 5950 ns/op 5200 B/op 26 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_ParseStatic 3365324 356 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_ParseParam 2976614 404 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_Parse2Params 2638084 439 ns/op 400 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_ParseAll 109567 11295 ns/op 10400 B/op 52 allocs/op
BenchmarkChi_StaticAll 16846 71308 ns/op 62802 B/op 314 allocs/op
Comparison with other routers: https://gist.github.com/pkieltyka/123032f12052520aaccab752bd3e78cc
NOTE: the allocs in the benchmark above are from the calls to http.Request's
WithContext(context.Context)
method that clones the http.Request, sets the Context()
on the duplicated (alloc'd) request and returns it the new request object. This is just
how setting context on a request in Go works.
Credits
- Carl Jackson for https://github.com/zenazn/goji
- Armon Dadgar for https://github.com/armon/go-radix
- Contributions: @VojtechVitek
We'll be more than happy to see your contributions!
Beyond REST
chi is just a http router that lets you decompose request handling into many smaller layers. Many companies use chi to write REST services for their public APIs. But, REST is just a convention for managing state via HTTP, and there's a lot of other pieces required to write a complete client-server system or network of microservices.
Looking beyond REST, I also recommend some newer works in the field:
- webrpc - Web-focused RPC client+server framework with code-gen
- gRPC - Google's RPC framework via protobufs
- graphql - Declarative query language
- NATS - lightweight pub-sub
License
Copyright (c) 2015-present Peter Kieltyka
Licensed under MIT License
Top Related Projects
Package gorilla/mux is a powerful HTTP router and URL matcher for building Go web servers with 🦍
Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin.
High performance, minimalist Go web framework
A high performance HTTP request router that scales well
⚡️ Express inspired web framework written in Go
Fast HTTP package for Go. Tuned for high performance. Zero memory allocations in hot paths. Up to 10x faster than net/http
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot