Pros of Angular

• Comprehensive framework with a full ecosystem of tools and libraries
• Regular updates and long-term support from Google
• Extensive documentation and large community support

Cons of Angular

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Larger bundle size, which can affect initial load times
• More opinionated, potentially limiting flexibility in some cases

Code Comparison

RDash Angular:

angular.module('RDash', ['RDash.Controllers', 'RDash.Services', 'ui.bootstrap', 'ui.router', 'ngCookies']);

Angular:

@NgModule({
  declarations: [AppComponent],
  imports: [BrowserModule, FormsModule, HttpClientModule],
  bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppModule { }

Key Differences

• RDash Angular is built on AngularJS (Angular 1.x), while Angular refers to Angular 2+ versions
• Angular uses TypeScript, providing better type checking and object-oriented features
• RDash Angular focuses on providing a dashboard template, while Angular is a full-fledged framework
• Angular offers improved performance and component-based architecture compared to AngularJS

Use Cases

• RDash Angular: Quick prototyping of admin dashboards using AngularJS
• Angular: Building complex, scalable web applications with modern web technologies

Pros of Bootstrap

• Larger community and more extensive documentation
• Wider range of UI components and features
• Regular updates and maintenance

Cons of Bootstrap

• Heavier footprint, potentially impacting performance
• Less focused on admin dashboard-specific components
• Steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

rdash-angular:

<rd-widget>
  <rd-widget-header icon="fa-users" title="Users"></rd-widget-header>
  <rd-widget-body>
    <input type="text" placeholder="Search" class="form-control input-sm">
  </rd-widget-body>
</rd-widget>

Bootstrap:

<div class="card">
  <div class="card-header">
    <i class="fa fa-users"></i> Users
  </div>
  <div class="card-body">
    <input type="text" placeholder="Search" class="form-control form-control-sm">
  </div>
</div>

Summary

Bootstrap offers a more comprehensive set of UI components and benefits from a larger community, while rdash-angular provides a more focused solution for admin dashboards. Bootstrap's extensive features come at the cost of a larger footprint, whereas rdash-angular is lighter but with fewer components. The code comparison shows that rdash-angular uses custom directives for widgets, while Bootstrap relies on standard HTML classes for similar functionality.

Pros of blur-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Modern design with a wider variety of UI components
• Active development and regular updates

Cons of blur-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler applications

Code Comparison

blur-admin:

<div ba-panel ba-panel-title="Standard Fields" ba-panel-class="with-scroll">
  <form>
    <div class="form-group">
      <label for="input01">Text</label>
      <input type="text" class="form-control" id="input01" placeholder="Text">
    </div>
    <!-- More form elements -->
  </form>
</div>

rdash-angular:

<rd-widget>
  <rd-widget-header icon="fa-tasks" title="Servers">
    <a href="#">Manage</a>
  </rd-widget-header>
  <rd-widget-body classes="medium no-padding">
    <div class="table-responsive">
      <!-- Table content -->
    </div>
  </rd-widget-body>
</rd-widget>

The code comparison shows that blur-admin uses custom directives like ba-panel, while rdash-angular uses a more modular approach with rd-widget components. blur-admin's code appears more focused on form elements, while rdash-angular emphasizes widget-based layouts.

Pros of ngx-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin dashboard template
• Regularly updated with new features and Angular version support
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of ngx-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler applications

Code Comparison

rdash-angular:

<div id="page-wrapper" ng-class="{'open': toggle}" ng-cloak>
  <div id="sidebar-wrapper">
    <ul class="sidebar">
      <li class="sidebar-main">
        <a ng-click="toggleSidebar()">
          Dashboard
          <span class="menu-icon glyphicon glyphicon-transfer"></span>
        </a>
      </li>
    </ul>
  </div>
</div>

ngx-admin:

<nb-layout>
  <nb-layout-header fixed>
    <nb-actions size="medium">
      <nb-action icon="menu-2-outline" (click)="toggle()"></nb-action>
    </nb-actions>
  </nb-layout-header>
  <nb-sidebar></nb-sidebar>
  <nb-layout-column>
    <router-outlet></router-outlet>
  </nb-layout-column>
</nb-layout>

Summary

ngx-admin offers a more modern and feature-rich admin dashboard template compared to rdash-angular. It provides extensive customization options and regular updates, making it suitable for complex applications. However, this comes at the cost of a steeper learning curve and potentially heavier performance. rdash-angular, while simpler, may be more suitable for lightweight applications or developers seeking a minimalistic approach. The code comparison highlights the difference in structure and component usage between the two projects.

Pros of material-dashboard-angular2

• Built with Angular 2+ and Material Design, offering a modern and sleek UI
• Includes pre-built components and templates for rapid dashboard development
• Responsive design with mobile-first approach

Cons of material-dashboard-angular2

• Larger file size and potentially slower initial load times
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Material Design

Code Comparison

material-dashboard-angular2:

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';
import * as Chartist from 'chartist';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-dashboard',
  templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html'
})
export class DashboardComponent implements OnInit {

rdash-angular:

angular.module('RDash')
.controller('MasterCtrl', ['$scope', '$cookieStore', MasterCtrl]);

function MasterCtrl($scope, $cookieStore) {
    var vm = this;

Summary

material-dashboard-angular2 offers a more modern approach with Angular 2+ and Material Design, providing pre-built components and responsive design. However, it may have a larger file size and steeper learning curve. rdash-angular, being older, uses AngularJS (1.x) and may be simpler for developers familiar with that version, but lacks the advanced features and design of the newer project.

Pros of CoreUI Free Angular Admin Template

• More recent and actively maintained project
• Comprehensive set of UI components and layouts
• Responsive design with mobile-first approach

Cons of CoreUI Free Angular Admin Template

• Larger file size and potentially more complex setup
• May include unnecessary features for simpler projects
• Steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

RDash Angular:

angular.module('RDash', ['ui.bootstrap', 'ui.router', 'ngCookies']);

CoreUI Free Angular Admin Template:

import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
import { BrowserAnimationsModule } from '@angular/platform-browser/animations';
import { AppComponent } from './app.component';

@NgModule({
  imports: [BrowserModule, BrowserAnimationsModule],
  declarations: [AppComponent],
  bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppModule { }

The code comparison shows that CoreUI uses a more modern Angular approach with TypeScript and decorators, while RDash Angular uses an older AngularJS style. CoreUI's structure is more aligned with current Angular best practices and provides better type safety and tooling support.

Overall, CoreUI offers a more feature-rich and up-to-date solution, but may be overkill for simpler projects. RDash Angular, while older, could be suitable for lightweight applications or those maintaining legacy AngularJS codebases.