arxiv-style

Pros of Paper-Writing-Tips

• Comprehensive coverage of various aspects of academic writing, including style, structure, and best practices
• Collaborative effort with contributions from multiple researchers and writers
• Regularly updated with new tips and resources

Cons of Paper-Writing-Tips

• Less focused on LaTeX and arXiv-specific formatting
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to the large amount of information
• Lacks ready-to-use templates or code snippets

Code Comparison

arxiv-style:

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,sans]{moderncv}
\moderncvstyle{casual}
\moderncvcolor{blue}
\usepackage[scale=0.75]{geometry}

Paper-Writing-Tips:

# Paper Writing Tips

## 1. Title
- Make it catchy and informative
- Use keywords relevant to your research

The arxiv-style repository provides LaTeX code for formatting, while Paper-Writing-Tips offers markdown-based guidelines for content creation.

Pros of paper-tips-and-tricks

• Broader scope, covering various aspects of academic paper writing and LaTeX usage
• Includes practical tips for improving paper quality and readability
• Offers guidance on figure creation and presentation

Cons of paper-tips-and-tricks

• Less focused on specific LaTeX templates or styles
• May require more effort to implement suggestions across different paper formats
• Not tailored specifically for arXiv submissions

Code comparison

paper-tips-and-tricks:

\usepackage[capitalise]{cleveref}
\crefname{equation}{Eq.}{Eqs.}
\crefname{figure}{Fig.}{Figs.}
\crefname{table}{Table}{Tables}

arxiv-style:

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{booktabs}

The code snippets show that paper-tips-and-tricks focuses on improving cross-referencing, while arxiv-style includes packages for basic document formatting and hyperlinks. arxiv-style is more tailored for arXiv submissions, whereas paper-tips-and-tricks offers general LaTeX improvements applicable to various document types.

Pros of rticles

• Broader scope with templates for multiple journals and article types
• Integrated with RStudio and R Markdown ecosystem
• More actively maintained with frequent updates

Cons of rticles

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex structure
• May include unnecessary features for users only interested in arXiv submissions
• Requires R and RStudio, which might not be preferred by all users

Code Comparison

arxiv-style:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{arxiv}
\begin{document}
\title{Your Paper Title}
\author{Author Name}
\maketitle
\end{document}

rticles:

---
title: "Your Paper Title"
author: "Author Name"
output: rticles::arxiv_article
---

# Introduction

Your content here...

Summary

arxiv-style is a simpler, more focused option for arXiv submissions, while rticles offers a comprehensive solution for various academic publishing needs within the R ecosystem. The choice between them depends on the user's specific requirements, preferred tools, and familiarity with R and LaTeX.

Pros of Awesome-CV

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering multiple templates and styles
• Includes sections for skills, projects, and publications, making it suitable for various professions
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and contributions from the community

Cons of Awesome-CV

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and numerous customization options
• May be overkill for those seeking a simple, academic-style CV or resume
• Requires more setup and configuration to achieve desired results

Code Comparison

Awesome-CV:

\documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{awesome-cv}
\geometry{left=1.4cm, top=.8cm, right=1.4cm, bottom=1.8cm, footskip=.5cm}
\fontdir[fonts/]
\colorlet{awesome}{awesome-emerald}

arxiv-style:

\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{arxiv}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}

The Awesome-CV code snippet demonstrates its focus on customization and styling, while the arxiv-style code shows a simpler, more academic-oriented approach. Awesome-CV offers more built-in features and design options, whereas arxiv-style provides a straightforward structure for academic papers and CVs.

Pros of pandoc-latex-template

• More versatile, supporting various document types beyond academic papers
• Offers greater customization options for document styling
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and contributions

Cons of pandoc-latex-template

• Less specialized for academic publishing, particularly arXiv submissions
• May require more setup and configuration for specific use cases
• Steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with Pandoc

Code Comparison

arxiv-style:

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,sans]{article}
\usepackage{arxiv}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}

pandoc-latex-template:

---
title: "Example Document"
author: [Author Name]
date: "2023-05-10"
subject: "Markdown/Pandoc"
keywords: [Markdown, Pandoc, LaTeX, PDF]
lang: "en"
---

The arxiv-style uses a LaTeX-based approach with a custom class file, while pandoc-latex-template employs a YAML metadata block for document configuration, allowing for easier integration with Markdown content.