Pros of moderncv

• More customizable themes and color schemes
• Easier to use for LaTeX beginners
• Better documentation and examples

Cons of moderncv

• Less modern and sleek design
• Fewer pre-built sections and layouts
• Limited support for academic CVs

Code Comparison

moderncv:

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,sans]{moderncv}
\moderncvstyle{classic}
\moderncvcolor{blue}
\name{John}{Doe}
\title{Curriculum Vitae}

Awesome-CV:

\documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{awesome-cv}
\colorlet{awesome}{awesome-emerald}
\renewcommand{\acvHeaderSocialSep}{\quad\textbar\quad}
\name{John}{Doe}
\position{Software Engineer{\enskip\cdotp\enskip}Security Specialist}

Both repositories provide LaTeX templates for creating professional CVs and resumes. moderncv offers a more traditional approach with multiple themes and color options, making it accessible for LaTeX beginners. Awesome-CV, on the other hand, provides a more modern and visually appealing design with pre-built sections tailored for tech professionals.

moderncv's code structure is simpler and more straightforward, while Awesome-CV offers more customization options and a more complex structure. Awesome-CV also includes additional features like social media integration and more detailed section layouts, which may be particularly useful for those in the tech industry.

Pros of resume

• Supports multiple languages (English, Chinese, German)
• Includes a cover letter template
• Offers both moderncv and classic styles

Cons of resume

• Less visually striking design compared to Awesome-CV
• Fewer customization options for layout and styling
• Limited font choices

Code Comparison

resume:

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,sans]{moderncv}
\moderncvstyle{classic}
\moderncvcolor{blue}
\usepackage[scale=0.75]{geometry}

Awesome-CV:

\documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{awesome-cv}
\geometry{left=1.4cm, top=.8cm, right=1.4cm, bottom=1.8cm, footskip=.5cm}
\fontdir[fonts/]

Both repositories provide LaTeX templates for creating professional resumes. resume offers a more traditional approach with support for multiple languages and styles, while Awesome-CV focuses on a modern, visually appealing design with extensive customization options. The code comparison shows that resume uses the moderncv class with classic style, while Awesome-CV uses a custom class with more precise geometry settings and custom font directories.

Pros of cv-boilerplate

• Minimalist and lightweight approach, focusing on content over design
• Uses Pandoc for flexible output formats (PDF, HTML, DocX)
• Easy to customize and extend with basic LaTeX knowledge

Cons of cv-boilerplate

• Less visually appealing out-of-the-box compared to Awesome-CV
• Fewer pre-designed sections and layout options
• Requires more manual formatting and styling

Code Comparison

cv-boilerplate:

\begin{document}
$if(cv)$
\input{cv}
$endif$
$if(letter)$
\input{letter}
$endif$
\end{document}

Awesome-CV:

\documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{awesome-cv}
\begin{document}
\makecvheader
\makecvfooter
  {\today}
  {John Doe~~~·~~~Curriculum Vitae}
  {\thepage}
\input{cv/education.tex}
\input{cv/experience.tex}
\end{document}

The code comparison shows that cv-boilerplate uses a more flexible approach with conditional inputs, while Awesome-CV has a more structured and predefined layout. Awesome-CV also includes built-in commands for header and footer creation, showcasing its more comprehensive design system.

Pros of latexcv

• Multiple template options, providing more variety for users
• Simpler structure, making it easier for beginners to understand and modify
• Includes a plain text version of the CV, which can be useful for certain applications

Cons of latexcv

• Less polished and professional-looking designs compared to Awesome-CV
• Fewer customization options and features
• Limited documentation and examples

Code Comparison

Awesome-CV:

\cvsection{Skills}
\begin{cvskills}
  \cvskill
    {Programming}
    {Python, C++, Java, JavaScript, SQL, R}
  \cvskill
    {Frameworks}
    {Django, React, Node.js, Express.js}
\end{cvskills}

latexcv:

\section{Skills}
\begin{itemize}
  \item Programming: Python, C++, Java, JavaScript, SQL, R
  \item Frameworks: Django, React, Node.js, Express.js
\end{itemize}

The code comparison shows that Awesome-CV uses custom commands and environments for structuring the CV, while latexcv relies more on standard LaTeX commands. This makes Awesome-CV more specialized and potentially more visually appealing, but latexcv may be easier to understand and modify for users familiar with basic LaTeX.

Pros of Deedy-Resume

• Minimalist and modern design, ideal for tech and engineering roles
• Single-page layout, forcing concise content presentation
• Easy to customize with clear LaTeX structure

Cons of Deedy-Resume

• Limited flexibility for extensive work experiences or publications
• Less suitable for academic or research-oriented CVs
• Fewer pre-built sections compared to Awesome-CV

Code Comparison

Deedy-Resume:

\documentclass[]{deedy-resume-openfont}
\begin{document}

\namesection{John}{Doe}{
Software Engineer | john@doe.com | (000) 111-1111
}

\section{Education}
\end{document}

Awesome-CV:

\documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{awesome-cv}
\begin{document}
\makecvheader[center]

\cvsection{Education}
\begin{cventries}
\cventry
{B.S. in Computer Science}
{Example University}
{City, Country}
{2010 - 2014}
{}
\end{cventries}
\end{document}

Both repositories offer LaTeX templates for creating professional resumes. Deedy-Resume focuses on a compact, single-page design, while Awesome-CV provides more extensive customization options and pre-built sections. The code comparison shows that Awesome-CV uses more structured environments for content organization, potentially offering greater flexibility for complex layouts.