lx-music-desktop

Pros of YesPlayMusic

• More modern and visually appealing user interface
• Better integration with Netease Cloud Music API
• Support for lyrics display and synchronization

Cons of YesPlayMusic

• Limited to Netease Cloud Music as the primary music source
• Fewer customization options for appearance and functionality
• Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to lx-music-desktop

Code Comparison

YesPlayMusic (Vue.js):

import { createApp } from 'vue';
import App from './App.vue';
import router from './router';
import store from './store';

createApp(App).use(store).use(router).mount('#app');

lx-music-desktop (Electron):

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron');
const path = require('path');

function createWindow() {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({
    width: 800,
    height: 600,
    webPreferences: {
      preload: path.join(__dirname, 'preload.js')
    }
  });
  win.loadFile('index.html');
}

app.whenReady().then(createWindow);

YesPlayMusic uses Vue.js for its frontend, while lx-music-desktop is built with Electron, allowing for a more native desktop experience. lx-music-desktop offers a wider range of music sources and more extensive features, but YesPlayMusic provides a more polished and modern user interface focused on Netease Cloud Music integration.

Pros of Navidrome

• Self-hosted music server with web UI and mobile apps
• Supports multiple users with individual libraries and playlists
• Integrates with various music players and streaming protocols

Cons of Navidrome

• Requires server setup and maintenance
• Limited to personal music libraries, no built-in music discovery features
• May have higher resource usage for large libraries

Code Comparison

Navidrome (Go):

func (s *Scanner) ScanLibrary(ctx context.Context) error {
    s.running.Set(true)
    defer s.running.Set(false)
    start := time.Now()
    ...
}

LX Music Desktop (JavaScript):

const handlePlayMusic = async(musicInfo, isRefresh = false) => {
  if (!musicInfo) return
  if (!isRefresh) setPlayMusicInfo(musicInfo)
  ...
}

Summary

Navidrome is a self-hosted music server solution, while LX Music Desktop is a cross-platform desktop music player. Navidrome offers multi-user support and integration with various players, but requires server setup. LX Music Desktop provides a simpler, standalone solution for desktop users, focusing on music playback and discovery from online sources. The code comparison shows Navidrome's server-side scanning functionality in Go, contrasting with LX Music Desktop's client-side playback handling in JavaScript.

Pros of NeteaseCloudMusicApi

• Provides a comprehensive API for accessing NetEase Cloud Music data
• Supports a wide range of functionalities, including user operations, playlist management, and song details
• Well-documented with detailed API endpoints and usage instructions

Cons of NeteaseCloudMusicApi

• Requires server-side implementation and maintenance
• Limited to NetEase Cloud Music platform, not a multi-source solution
• May be subject to changes in NetEase's API, requiring frequent updates

Code Comparison

NeteaseCloudMusicApi:

const { login_cellphone, user_playlist } = require('NeteaseCloudMusicApi')

login_cellphone({
  phone: '手机号',
  password: '密码'
}).then(result => {
  console.log(result)
  user_playlist({
    uid: result.body.account.id
  }).then(data => {
    console.log(data)
  })
})

lx-music-desktop:

import { getCurrentPlayInfo } from '@renderer/utils/ipc'
import { setPlayInfo } from '@renderer/core/player/playInfo'

const updatePlayInfo = async() => {
  const info = await getCurrentPlayInfo()
  setPlayInfo(info)
}

The code snippets demonstrate the different approaches: NeteaseCloudMusicApi focuses on API interactions, while lx-music-desktop handles local playback and UI updates.

Pros of Wiki

• More comprehensive documentation and extensive wiki features
• Larger community and active development with frequent updates
• Supports multiple authentication methods and integrations

Cons of Wiki

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex features
• Requires more system resources to run compared to LX Music Desktop
• May be overkill for simple music management needs

Code Comparison

Wiki (JavaScript):

const Wiki = require('wiki.js')
const wiki = new Wiki({
  apiUrl: 'https://your-wiki-url/graphql'
})

LX Music Desktop (JavaScript):

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')
function createWindow () {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({ width: 800, height: 600 })
  win.loadFile('index.html')
}

Summary

Wiki is a feature-rich, collaborative knowledge base platform, while LX Music Desktop is a focused music player and management tool. Wiki offers more extensive functionality for documentation and team collaboration, but may be more complex to set up and use. LX Music Desktop provides a simpler, lightweight solution for music enthusiasts. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the user or organization.

Pros of koel

• Web-based application, accessible from any device with a browser
• Supports multiple users and user management
• More extensive API and integration capabilities

Cons of koel

• Requires server setup and maintenance
• Less focus on offline functionality
• Potentially more complex for non-technical users

Code Comparison

koel (PHP):

public function play($songId)
{
    $song = Song::findOrFail($songId);
    event(new SongStartedPlaying($song, Auth::user()));
    return response()->json($song);
}

lx-music-desktop (JavaScript):

ipcMain.on('play', async (event, songInfo) => {
  try {
    const audioUrl = await getSongUrl(songInfo.id);
    event.reply('play-song', { url: audioUrl, ...songInfo });
  } catch (error) {
    event.reply('play-error', error.message);
  }
});

Summary

koel is a web-based music streaming server and player, while lx-music-desktop is a desktop application for music playback and management. koel offers multi-user support and broader accessibility but requires more setup. lx-music-desktop provides a simpler, offline-capable solution for individual users. The code comparison shows koel's server-side approach versus lx-music-desktop's desktop-centric implementation.

Pros of listen1_chrome_extension

• Browser-based extension, making it easily accessible across different platforms
• Supports multiple Chinese music streaming services in one interface
• Lightweight and doesn't require a separate desktop application installation

Cons of listen1_chrome_extension

• Limited to browser usage, lacking system-wide integration
• May have potential performance limitations compared to a native desktop application
• Dependent on browser compatibility and updates

Code Comparison

lx-music-desktop (Electron-based desktop application):

const { app, BrowserWindow } = require('electron')
const path = require('path')

function createWindow () {
  const win = new BrowserWindow({
    width: 800,
    height: 600,
    webPreferences: {
      preload: path.join(__dirname, 'preload.js')
    }
  })
  win.loadFile('index.html')
}

listen1_chrome_extension (Chrome extension):

chrome.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function(tab) {
  chrome.tabs.create({'url': chrome.extension.getURL('listen1.html')}, function(tab) {
    // Tab opened.
  });
});

The code snippets highlight the different approaches: lx-music-desktop uses Electron to create a desktop window, while listen1_chrome_extension leverages Chrome's extension API to open a new tab with the player interface.