Pros of Awesome-CV

• More visually appealing and modern design
• Extensive customization options for layout and styling
• Includes pre-designed templates for different CV types

Cons of Awesome-CV

• Steeper learning curve due to LaTeX-based system
• Requires LaTeX knowledge for advanced customization
• Less portable than Markdown-based alternatives

Code Comparison

Awesome-CV (LaTeX):

\documentclass[11pt, a4paper]{awesome-cv}
\name{Your}{Name}
\position{Your Job Title}
\address{Your Address}
\mobile{Your Phone Number}
\email{your.email@example.com}

pandoc_resume (Markdown):

# Your Name
## Your Job Title

> [your.email@example.com](mailto:your.email@example.com) |
> [Your Phone Number](tel:+1234567890) |
> Your Address

Both repositories offer unique approaches to resume creation. Awesome-CV provides a more polished and customizable output but requires LaTeX knowledge. pandoc_resume offers simplicity and portability with its Markdown-based system, making it easier for users familiar with plain text formatting. The choice between the two depends on the user's preferences, technical skills, and desired output style.

Pros of resume

• Utilizes LaTeX for professional typesetting and formatting
• Includes a pre-designed template with a modern, clean layout
• Offers easy customization through a single JSON file for content

Cons of resume

• Requires LaTeX knowledge for advanced customization
• Limited to a single template design without built-in alternatives
• May have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with LaTeX

Code Comparison

resume (main.tex):

\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage[empty]{fullpage}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage{marvosym}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color}

pandoc_resume (style_chmduquesne.css):

body {
    font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
    width: 800px;
    margin: auto;
    background: #FFFFFF;
    padding: 10px 10px 10px 10px;
}

The resume project uses LaTeX for document structure and formatting, while pandoc_resume employs CSS for styling HTML output. resume offers a more traditional approach to resume creation with LaTeX, while pandoc_resume provides a more web-friendly solution using Markdown and Pandoc for conversion to various formats.

Pros of best-resume-ever

• Offers multiple pre-designed templates for quick customization
• Provides a user-friendly web interface for editing and previewing resumes
• Supports exporting to PDF and HTML formats

Cons of best-resume-ever

• Requires more dependencies and setup compared to pandoc_resume
• Less flexible for users who prefer working with plain text or Markdown
• May have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with Vue.js

Code Comparison

pandoc_resume:

---
name: John Doe
email: johndoe@email.com
phone: (555) 555-5555
---

# Education

## University Name
*Degree* / Sep 2010 - Jun 2014

best-resume-ever:

<template>
  <div class="resume">
    <h1>{{ person.name }}</h1>
    <p>{{ person.email }} | {{ person.phone }}</p>
    <h2>Education</h2>
    <div v-for="edu in person.education" :key="edu.degree">
      <h3>{{ edu.institution }}</h3>
      <p>{{ edu.degree }} / {{ edu.startDate }} - {{ edu.endDate }}</p>
    </div>
  </div>
</template>

The code comparison shows that pandoc_resume uses a simple Markdown format, while best-resume-ever employs a Vue.js template structure for more dynamic content rendering.

Pros of awesome-resume

• Extensive collection of resume templates and resources
• Includes templates for various industries and job roles
• Offers additional career-related resources like interview tips

Cons of awesome-resume

• Less customizable than pandoc_resume
• Requires more manual effort to adapt templates
• May not provide a consistent output format across different templates

Code comparison

pandoc_resume:

name: John Doe
phone: (555) 555-5555
email: johndoe@email.com

awesome-resume:

<h1>John Doe</h1>
<p>Phone: (555) 555-5555</p>
<p>Email: johndoe@email.com</p>

Key differences

• pandoc_resume uses a single-source approach with Markdown and YAML
• awesome-resume provides a curated list of pre-designed templates
• pandoc_resume offers more flexibility in output formats (PDF, HTML, DOCX)
• awesome-resume focuses on providing a wide variety of ready-to-use designs

Use cases

• pandoc_resume: Ideal for users comfortable with Markdown and seeking a highly customizable solution
• awesome-resume: Better for those looking for quick, pre-designed templates and career resources

Community and maintenance

• pandoc_resume: Smaller community, less frequent updates
• awesome-resume: Larger community, more regular contributions and updates

Pros of Reactive-Resume

• User-friendly web-based interface for creating and editing resumes
• Multiple customizable templates and themes
• Real-time preview of changes

Cons of Reactive-Resume

• Requires internet connection for full functionality
• More complex setup and dependencies
• Potentially steeper learning curve for non-technical users

Code Comparison

Pandoc_resume (Markdown):

# John Doe

## Education

- Ph.D. in Computer Science, University of Example, 2020
- M.S. in Computer Science, University of Sample, 2015

Reactive-Resume (JSON):

{
  "basics": {
    "name": "John Doe"
  },
  "education": [
    {
      "institution": "University of Example",
      "area": "Computer Science",
      "studyType": "Ph.D.",
      "endDate": "2020"
    },
    {
      "institution": "University of Sample",
      "area": "Computer Science",
      "studyType": "M.S.",
      "endDate": "2015"
    }
  ]
}

Pandoc_resume uses simple Markdown syntax for resume content, making it easy to edit and version control. Reactive-Resume uses a more structured JSON format, which allows for better data organization and easier integration with web-based tools.

Pros of resume-cli

• Standardized JSON schema for resume data
• Extensive theme ecosystem with easy customization
• Export to multiple formats (PDF, HTML, JSON)

Cons of resume-cli

• Steeper learning curve for non-developers
• Less flexibility in resume structure compared to Markdown

Code Comparison

resume-cli:

{
  "basics": {
    "name": "John Doe",
    "label": "Programmer",
    "email": "john@gmail.com"
  },
  "work": [
    {
      "company": "Company",
      "position": "Position",
      "startDate": "2013-01-01"
    }
  ]
}

pandoc_resume:

# John Doe

## Contact

Email: john@gmail.com

## Experience

### Company (2013-present)

Position

Key Differences

• resume-cli uses a structured JSON format, while pandoc_resume uses Markdown
• resume-cli offers a more standardized approach, whereas pandoc_resume provides more flexibility in content structure
• resume-cli has built-in theme support, while pandoc_resume relies on external styling through LaTeX or CSS

Use Cases

• resume-cli: Ideal for developers comfortable with JSON and seeking a standardized format
• pandoc_resume: Better suited for users who prefer writing in Markdown and want more control over the resume structure

Both projects offer unique advantages, and the choice between them depends on personal preferences and technical requirements.