PKHUD

Pros of SVProgressHUD

• More established and widely used in the iOS development community
• Offers a broader range of customization options
• Supports multiple styles of HUDs (success, error, info, etc.)

Cons of SVProgressHUD

• Larger codebase, which may lead to increased app size
• Less modern Swift syntax, as it's primarily written in Objective-C

Code Comparison

SVProgressHUD:

SVProgressHUD.show()
SVProgressHUD.showProgress(0.5)
SVProgressHUD.dismiss()

PKHUD:

HUD.flash(.success, delay: 1.0)
HUD.show(.progress)
HUD.hide()

Key Differences

• PKHUD is written in Swift, while SVProgressHUD is primarily Objective-C
• PKHUD has a more modern and streamlined API
• SVProgressHUD offers more built-in styles and customization options
• PKHUD has a smaller footprint and may be easier to integrate into Swift-only projects

Use Cases

• SVProgressHUD: Ideal for projects requiring extensive customization and compatibility with Objective-C
• PKHUD: Better suited for Swift-based projects prioritizing a lightweight, modern implementation

Both libraries provide similar core functionality for displaying progress HUDs in iOS applications, but they cater to different developer preferences and project requirements.

Pros of MBProgressHUD

• More mature and widely adopted, with a larger community and extensive documentation
• Offers a wider range of customization options and styles
• Supports both UIKit and AppKit, making it versatile for iOS and macOS development

Cons of MBProgressHUD

• Slightly more complex API, which may require a steeper learning curve
• Heavier in terms of file size and memory footprint
• Less modern Swift syntax, as it's primarily written in Objective-C

Code Comparison

MBProgressHUD:

let hud = MBProgressHUD.showAdded(to: view, animated: true)
hud.label.text = "Loading..."
hud.detailsLabel.text = "Please wait"
hud.hide(animated: true, afterDelay: 3.0)

PKHUD:

PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDProgressView()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.show()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.hide(afterDelay: 3.0)

PKHUD offers a more concise API with a modern Swift syntax, making it easier to use for Swift developers. However, MBProgressHUD provides more granular control over the HUD's appearance and behavior, which can be beneficial for complex use cases.

Pros of ProgressHUD

• More customization options for appearance and animations
• Supports both Swift and Objective-C
• Includes additional features like progress bars and custom views

Cons of ProgressHUD

• Larger codebase, potentially increasing app size
• May have a steeper learning curve due to more options
• Less frequently updated compared to PKHUD

Code Comparison

PKHUD:

PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDSuccessView()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.show()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.hide(afterDelay: 1.0)

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show("Loading...")
ProgressHUD.showSuccess("Completed")
ProgressHUD.dismiss()

Both libraries offer simple APIs for displaying HUDs, but ProgressHUD provides more descriptive method names and built-in options for different HUD types. PKHUD requires more configuration for custom content views.

ProgressHUD offers a wider range of pre-built HUD styles and animations, making it easier to implement various visual feedback options without additional customization. However, PKHUD's simpler API may be preferable for projects with basic HUD requirements.

Ultimately, the choice between these libraries depends on the specific needs of your project, considering factors such as customization requirements, ease of use, and integration with existing codebases.

Pros of KProgressHUD

• More customization options for HUD appearance and animations
• Supports both Swift and Objective-C
• Includes built-in progress indicators (determinate and indeterminate)

Cons of KProgressHUD

• Less actively maintained (last update was in 2019)
• Slightly more complex API compared to PKHUD
• Fewer pre-built styles and layouts

Code Comparison

KProgressHUD:

KProgressHUD.show()
KProgressHUD.showSuccess()
KProgressHUD.showProgress(0.5)
KProgressHUD.dismiss()

PKHUD:

PKHUD.sharedHUD.show()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDSuccessView()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDProgressView(progress: 0.5)
PKHUD.sharedHUD.hide()

Summary

Both KProgressHUD and PKHUD are HUD libraries for iOS, offering similar core functionality. KProgressHUD provides more customization options and built-in progress indicators, making it suitable for projects requiring detailed HUD control. PKHUD, on the other hand, offers a simpler API and is more actively maintained, making it a good choice for projects prioritizing ease of use and ongoing support. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements and preferences for API simplicity versus customization options.

Pros of Toast-Swift

• Lightweight and simple implementation focused solely on toast notifications
• Customizable appearance and positioning of toasts
• Supports queueing multiple toasts

Cons of Toast-Swift

• Limited to toast-style notifications only
• Lacks built-in loading indicators or progress HUDs
• May require additional libraries for more complex UI feedback

Code Comparison

Toast-Swift:

view.makeToast("This is a toast message")

PKHUD:

PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDTextView(text: "This is a HUD message")
PKHUD.sharedHUD.show()

Summary

Toast-Swift is a lightweight library focused on providing toast-style notifications, offering customization options and queueing capabilities. It's ideal for simple, non-intrusive user feedback.

PKHUD, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive HUD (Heads-Up Display) library that provides various styles of notifications, including loading indicators and progress HUDs. It offers more flexibility for different types of user feedback but may be overkill for projects only needing simple toast notifications.

The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project. If you only need toast notifications, Toast-Swift might be the simpler option. For more diverse UI feedback, PKHUD could be more suitable.

Pros of JGProgressHUD

• More customization options for appearance and animations
• Supports multiple HUD styles (e.g., extra light, light, dark)
• Includes built-in progress indicators (e.g., pie chart, ring)

Cons of JGProgressHUD

• Slightly more complex API, potentially steeper learning curve
• Larger codebase, which may impact app size
• Less frequent updates compared to PKHUD

Code Comparison

PKHUD:

PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDSuccessView()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.show()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.hide(afterDelay: 1.0)

JGProgressHUD:

let hud = JGProgressHUD(style: .dark)
hud.textLabel.text = "Loading"
hud.show(in: view)
hud.dismiss(afterDelay: 3.0)

Both libraries offer simple ways to display and dismiss HUDs, but JGProgressHUD provides more options for customization in its initialization and configuration. PKHUD has a more concise API for basic usage, while JGProgressHUD offers greater flexibility for complex scenarios.