ProgressHUD

Pros of MBProgressHUD

• More mature and widely adopted project with a larger community
• Offers more customization options and styles out of the box
• Better documentation and example usage

Cons of MBProgressHUD

• Slightly more complex API, which may require more setup code
• Larger codebase, potentially increasing app size

Code Comparison

MBProgressHUD:

MBProgressHUD *hud = [MBProgressHUD showHUDAddedTo:self.view animated:YES];
hud.mode = MBProgressHUDModeIndeterminate;
hud.label.text = @"Loading...";
[hud showAnimated:YES];

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show("Loading...")

The code comparison shows that ProgressHUD offers a simpler, more concise API for basic usage, while MBProgressHUD provides more granular control over the HUD's appearance and behavior.

MBProgressHUD is generally considered the more feature-rich and flexible option, suitable for projects requiring extensive customization. ProgressHUD, on the other hand, excels in simplicity and ease of use, making it a good choice for projects with straightforward HUD requirements.

Both libraries are actively maintained and have their strengths, so the choice between them often comes down to specific project needs and developer preferences.

Pros of SVProgressHUD

• More established and widely used in the iOS development community
• Offers a broader range of customization options
• Supports CocoaPods, Carthage, and Swift Package Manager

Cons of SVProgressHUD

• Larger codebase, which may lead to a slightly larger app size
• Less frequent updates compared to ProgressHUD

Code Comparison

SVProgressHUD:

SVProgressHUD.show()
SVProgressHUD.showProgress(0.5)
SVProgressHUD.showSuccess(withStatus: "Done!")
SVProgressHUD.dismiss()

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show()
ProgressHUD.showProgress(0.5)
ProgressHUD.showSucceed("Done!")
ProgressHUD.dismiss()

Both libraries offer similar basic functionality for displaying progress HUDs in iOS applications. SVProgressHUD provides more customization options and has been around longer, making it a popular choice among developers. However, ProgressHUD has a simpler API and a more lightweight codebase, which may be preferable for smaller projects or those prioritizing minimal dependencies.

The code comparison shows that both libraries have similar method names and usage patterns, making it relatively easy to switch between them if needed. The main differences lie in the naming conventions and the specific parameters required for certain methods.

Pros of PKHUD

• More modern and customizable UI with a sleek, flat design
• Built-in support for Swift and SwiftUI
• Offers a wider variety of pre-built HUD styles and animations

Cons of PKHUD

• Less extensive documentation compared to ProgressHUD
• Fewer customization options for text and icon colors
• May require more setup and configuration for basic use cases

Code Comparison

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show("Loading...")
ProgressHUD.showSuccess("Completed")
ProgressHUD.dismiss()

PKHUD:

PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDProgressView()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.show()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.contentView = PKHUDSuccessView()
PKHUD.sharedHUD.hide(afterDelay: 1.0)

Both libraries offer simple ways to display loading indicators and success messages, but PKHUD requires more explicit configuration of content views. ProgressHUD provides more concise methods for common use cases, while PKHUD offers greater flexibility in terms of custom content views and animations.

Pros of KProgressHUD

• More customization options for HUD appearance and animations
• Supports both determinate and indeterminate progress indicators
• Easier to implement custom views within the HUD

Cons of KProgressHUD

• Less frequently updated compared to ProgressHUD
• Slightly more complex API, which may require a steeper learning curve
• Fewer pre-built styles and configurations out of the box

Code Comparison

KProgressHUD:

KProgressHUD.show()
KProgressHUD.showSuccess()
KProgressHUD.showError()
KProgressHUD.showProgress(0.75)
KProgressHUD.dismiss()

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show()
ProgressHUD.showSuccess()
ProgressHUD.showError()
ProgressHUD.showProgress(0.75)
ProgressHUD.dismiss()

Both libraries offer similar basic functionality, but KProgressHUD provides more options for customization and advanced features. ProgressHUD has a simpler API and is more frequently updated, making it a good choice for projects that require a straightforward HUD implementation. KProgressHUD is better suited for applications that need more control over the HUD's appearance and behavior, despite its slightly more complex usage.

Pros of Toast-Swift

• Lightweight and focused solely on toast notifications
• Easy to customize appearance and duration of toasts
• Supports queueing multiple toasts

Cons of Toast-Swift

• Limited to toast notifications, lacks progress HUD functionality
• Less actively maintained compared to ProgressHUD
• Fewer animation options for displaying and dismissing toasts

Code Comparison

Toast-Swift:

view.makeToast("This is a toast")
view.makeToast("This is a toast", duration: 3.0, position: .top)

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show("Loading...")
ProgressHUD.showSuccess("Success!")
ProgressHUD.dismiss()

Summary

Toast-Swift is a lightweight library focused on toast notifications, offering easy customization and queueing. However, it lacks the broader functionality of ProgressHUD, which includes progress indicators and various HUD styles. ProgressHUD provides a more comprehensive solution for displaying different types of temporary messages and indicators in iOS apps.

While Toast-Swift is simpler to use for basic toast notifications, ProgressHUD offers more versatility for different use cases. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and whether you need additional HUD functionality beyond toast notifications.

Pros of JGProgressHUD

• More customization options, including custom animations and appearances
• Better support for iOS accessibility features
• Actively maintained with regular updates and bug fixes

Cons of JGProgressHUD

• Slightly more complex API, which may require a steeper learning curve
• Larger file size due to additional features and customization options

Code Comparison

ProgressHUD:

ProgressHUD.show("Loading...")
ProgressHUD.showSuccess("Completed")
ProgressHUD.dismiss()

JGProgressHUD:

let hud = JGProgressHUD(style: .dark)
hud.textLabel.text = "Loading..."
hud.show(in: view)
hud.dismiss(afterDelay: 3.0)

Both libraries offer simple ways to display progress HUDs, but JGProgressHUD provides more granular control over the HUD's appearance and behavior. ProgressHUD has a more straightforward API, making it easier to use for basic scenarios. JGProgressHUD's additional customization options come at the cost of a slightly more verbose implementation.

While ProgressHUD is lightweight and easy to integrate, JGProgressHUD offers more advanced features and better maintainability. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the level of customization needed.