Pros of PEASS-ng

• More comprehensive and actively maintained, with regular updates
• Supports multiple operating systems (Linux, macOS, Windows)
• Includes additional features like automatic exploitation and report generation

Cons of PEASS-ng

• Larger codebase, potentially slower execution on resource-constrained systems
• May require more setup and configuration for specific use cases
• Higher complexity, which could lead to a steeper learning curve for new users

Code Comparison

LinEnum (bash script):

#!/bin/bash
version="0.982"

# Global variables
thorough=0
header=""
debug=""

PEASS-ng (Python script):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import os
import argparse
from peass.linpeas.linpeas import LinPEAS

if __name__ == "__main__":
    LinPEAS().run()

The code comparison shows that PEASS-ng uses Python, which offers more flexibility and easier maintenance compared to LinEnum's bash script. PEASS-ng's modular structure allows for better organization and extensibility, while LinEnum's single-file approach may be simpler for quick deployments.

Pros of linux-smart-enumeration

• More focused on smart and efficient enumeration, potentially faster for large systems
• Colorized output for better readability and quick identification of important information
• Actively maintained with more recent updates

Cons of linux-smart-enumeration

• Less comprehensive in some areas compared to LinEnum
• May require more manual interpretation of results
• Smaller community and fewer contributions

Code Comparison

LinEnum:

#!/bin/bash
version="version"

#help function
usage () 
{ 
echo -e "\n\e[00;31m#########################################################\e[00m" 
echo -e "\e[00;31m#\e[00m" "\e[00;33mLocal Linux Enumeration & Privilege Escalation Script\e[00m" "\e[00;31m#\e[00m"

linux-smart-enumeration:

#!/bin/sh

###########################################
#---------------) Colors (----------------#
###########################################

C=$(printf '\033')
RED="${C}[1;31m"
GREEN="${C}[1;32m"
Y="${C}[1;33m"

Both scripts start with a shebang and include color definitions, but linux-smart-enumeration uses a more compact color definition approach. LinEnum includes a version variable and a usage function, while linux-smart-enumeration focuses on color definitions upfront.

Pros of linuxprivchecker

• Written in Python, making it more versatile and easier to modify
• Provides a more detailed output, including system information and user accounts
• Actively maintained with recent updates

Cons of linuxprivchecker

• Slower execution compared to LinEnum's bash script
• Requires Python to be installed on the target system
• Less comprehensive in some areas, such as SUID/SGID file checks

Code Comparison

LinEnum (Bash):

#!/bin/bash
version="version"

# Header
header() {
  echo "LinEnum $version"
  echo "[+] Performing Linux Enumeration"
}

linuxprivchecker (Python):

#!/usr/bin/env python

# Check if we are running as root
if os.geteuid() != 0:
    print("\nWARNING: Not running as root. Some checks may fail.\n")

Both tools aim to perform Linux privilege escalation checks, but they differ in their implementation and output format. LinEnum is a bash script that provides a quick and comprehensive overview, while linuxprivchecker offers a more detailed analysis using Python. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the user and the target system's configuration.

Pros of linux-exploit-suggester

• Focuses specifically on suggesting potential exploits based on system information
• Provides more detailed exploit information, including CVE numbers and references
• Regularly updated with new exploit suggestions

Cons of linux-exploit-suggester

• Less comprehensive system enumeration compared to LinEnum
• May require more manual analysis to determine exploit applicability
• Limited to suggesting kernel exploits, while LinEnum covers broader system information

Code Comparison

LinEnum:

#!/bin/bash
version="0.982"

#help function
usage () 
{ 
echo -e "\n\e[00;31m#########################################################\e[00m" 
echo -e "\e[00;31m#\e[00m" "\e[00;33mLocal Linux Enumeration & Privilege Escalation Script\e[00m" "\e[00;31m#\e[00m"

linux-exploit-suggester:

#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Getopt::Long qw(:config no_ignore_case bundling);
use Term::ANSIColor;

my $VERSION = "2.0.0";

The code comparison shows that LinEnum is written in Bash, while linux-exploit-suggester is written in Perl. LinEnum's code focuses on setting up the script and defining helper functions, while linux-exploit-suggester's code sets up the environment and imports necessary modules.

Pros of linux-exploit-suggester-2

• Focuses specifically on suggesting potential kernel exploits
• Regularly updated with new exploit information
• Lightweight and easy to run on target systems

Cons of linux-exploit-suggester-2

• Limited scope compared to LinEnum's comprehensive system enumeration
• May produce false positives or outdated exploit suggestions
• Requires manual verification and exploitation of suggested vulnerabilities

Code Comparison

LinEnum (bash script):

#!/bin/bash
VERSION="0.982"

# Global variables
SCRIPTNAME="LinEnum.sh"
LOGNAME=""

linux-exploit-suggester-2 (Perl script):

#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Getopt::Long;

my $VERSION = "2.0";

Summary

LinEnum is a comprehensive system enumeration tool, while linux-exploit-suggester-2 focuses specifically on identifying potential kernel exploits. LinEnum provides a broader range of system information, but linux-exploit-suggester-2 offers more targeted and up-to-date exploit suggestions. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the user and the context of the security assessment.