Pros of PEASS-ng

• More comprehensive, covering multiple operating systems (Linux, Windows, macOS)
• Actively maintained with frequent updates
• Includes additional features like automatic exploitation and report generation

Cons of PEASS-ng

• More complex to use due to its extensive feature set
• Larger codebase, potentially slower execution on resource-constrained systems
• May generate more noise in output, requiring more analysis

Code Comparison

PEASS-ng (linpeas.sh):

if [ "$MACPEAS" ]; then
    print_2title "System Information"
    system_info
else
    print_2title "Linux System Information"
    debug_print "OS: $OSTYPE"
    echo "OS: $OSTYPE"
    echo "User & Groups: $USER $UID $(id)"

linuxprivchecker:

def get_system_info():
    print("[*] GETTING SYSTEM INFO...\n")
    results = []
    sysInfo = {}
    hostName = os.uname()[1]
    osName = os.uname()[0]
    kernel = os.uname()[2]

Both scripts aim to gather system information, but PEASS-ng uses shell scripting while linuxprivchecker uses Python. PEASS-ng's approach allows for easier cross-platform compatibility, while linuxprivchecker's Python implementation may offer better performance and easier maintenance.

Pros of LinEnum

• More comprehensive and detailed output, covering a wider range of system information
• Regularly updated with new features and improvements
• Includes colorized output for better readability

Cons of LinEnum

• Larger script size, potentially slower execution on resource-constrained systems
• May produce excessive output, making it harder to identify critical information quickly

Code Comparison

LinEnum:

#!/bin/bash
VERSION="0.982"

# Check if we're being piped
if readlink /proc/$$/fd/1 | grep -q "^pipe:"; then
    PIPE=1
fi

linuxprivchecker:

#!/usr/bin/env python

# Import libraries
import os
import subprocess
import sys

LinEnum is written in Bash, while linuxprivchecker is written in Python. LinEnum checks for piped output, which may affect its behavior, while linuxprivchecker focuses on importing necessary libraries for its functionality.

Both tools aim to gather system information for privilege escalation, but LinEnum generally provides more extensive output and is more actively maintained. However, linuxprivchecker's Python implementation may offer better cross-platform compatibility and easier customization for users familiar with Python.

Pros of linux-exploit-suggester

• More actively maintained with recent updates
• Supports a wider range of Linux distributions and versions
• Provides more detailed vulnerability information and exploit suggestions

Cons of linux-exploit-suggester

• Larger script size, potentially slower execution
• May require more dependencies or external resources
• Could generate more false positives due to broader coverage

Code Comparison

linuxprivchecker:

def get_os_info():
    os_info = {}
    os_info['KERNEL'] = os.uname()[2]
    os_info['HOSTNAME'] = os.uname()[1]
    return os_info

linux-exploit-suggester:

get_kernel_version() {
    kernel_version=$(uname -r)
    kernel_version=${kernel_version%%-*}
    kernel_major=$(echo "$kernel_version" | cut -d. -f1)
    kernel_minor=$(echo "$kernel_version" | cut -d. -f2)
    kernel_release=$(echo "$kernel_version" | cut -d. -f3)
}

Both scripts aim to gather system information, but linux-exploit-suggester provides more detailed kernel version parsing, which is crucial for accurate vulnerability matching.

Pros of linux-smart-enumeration

• More actively maintained with recent updates
• Offers color-coded output for better readability
• Includes a "quiet mode" for stealthier operation

Cons of linux-smart-enumeration

• Larger file size, potentially less suitable for quick transfers
• More complex usage with multiple options and modes
• May be overkill for simple enumeration tasks

Code Comparison

linuxprivchecker:

def enum_user_info():
    print "\n[*] ENUMERATING USER AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFO...\n"
    print "[+] Current user/group info:\n"
    os.system("id")
    print "\n[+] Users that have previously logged onto the system:\n"
    os.system("ls -alh /home/")

linux-smart-enumeration:

lse_user_info() {
  lse_test "usr000" "1" \
    "Current user groups" \
    'groups' \
    "" \
    "lse_exec groups"

  lse_test "usr010" "1" \
    "Other users in the system" \
    'cat /etc/passwd' \
    "" \
    "lse_proc_print \"\\nUsername:UID:GID:Home:Shell\n$(cat /etc/passwd | awk -F: '{print \$1\":\"$3\":\"$4\":\"$6\":\"$7}')\""
}

The code comparison shows that linux-smart-enumeration uses more sophisticated bash scripting with functions and parameters, while linuxprivchecker uses simpler Python code with direct system calls. This reflects the overall complexity difference between the two tools.

Pros of BeRoot

• Multi-platform support (Windows, Linux, macOS)
• More comprehensive privilege escalation checks
• Active development and regular updates

Cons of BeRoot

• Larger codebase, potentially slower execution
• Requires Python 3, which may not be available on all systems
• More complex to use and interpret results

Code Comparison

BeRoot (Python):

def check_suid_bin():
    suid = []
    for path in os.environ['PATH'].split(':'):
        for file in os.listdir(path):
            try:
                if os.stat(os.path.join(path, file)).st_mode & stat.S_ISUID:
                    suid.append(os.path.join(path, file))
            except:
                pass
    return suid

linuxprivchecker (Bash):

find / -perm -4000 -type f -exec ls -la {} 2>/dev/null \;

BeRoot offers a more sophisticated approach to checking SUID binaries, handling potential errors and using Python's built-in functions. linuxprivchecker uses a simple but effective one-line command to achieve a similar result.

Both tools serve the purpose of privilege escalation checking, but BeRoot provides a more comprehensive and multi-platform solution at the cost of increased complexity. linuxprivchecker offers a simpler, lightweight alternative specifically for Linux systems.