Top Related Projects
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'
A cat(1) clone with wings.
A modern replacement for ‘ls’.
A syntax-highlighting pager for git, diff, grep, and blame output
A full featured, fast Command Line Argument Parser for Rust
Quick Overview
The cc-rs
project is a Rust library that provides a simple and flexible interface for compiling C and C++ code within Rust programs. It is designed to be a cross-platform solution, supporting various operating systems and compilers.
Pros
- Cross-platform Compatibility:
cc-rs
supports a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, as well as various compilers such as GCC, Clang, and MSVC. - Flexible Configuration: The library allows for customization of compiler flags, include directories, and other settings, making it suitable for a variety of use cases.
- Caching and Incremental Compilation:
cc-rs
implements caching and incremental compilation, which can significantly improve build times for projects that involve compiling C or C++ code. - Ease of Use: The library provides a simple and intuitive API, making it easy to integrate into Rust projects.
Cons
- Dependency on External Compilers:
cc-rs
relies on the presence of a compatible C/C++ compiler on the target system, which may not always be the case, especially on non-development machines. - Limited Error Handling: The library's error handling could be improved, as it may not always provide detailed information about compilation failures.
- Potential Compatibility Issues: As the library aims to support a wide range of compilers and platforms, there may be occasional compatibility issues or edge cases that require workarounds.
- Lack of Advanced Features: While
cc-rs
is a capable library, it may not provide the full range of features and customization options that some users might require for more complex projects.
Code Examples
Here are a few examples of how to use the cc-rs
library in Rust:
- Compiling a single C file:
use cc::Build;
fn main() {
Build::new()
.file("src/my_c_file.c")
.compile("my-c-library");
}
- Compiling multiple C files:
use cc::Build;
fn main() {
Build::new()
.files(["src/file1.c", "src/file2.c", "src/file3.c"])
.compile("my-c-library");
}
- Configuring compiler flags and include directories:
use cc::Build;
fn main() {
Build::new()
.files(["src/file1.c", "src/file2.c"])
.include("include")
.flag("-Wall")
.flag("-Wextra")
.compile("my-c-library");
}
- Compiling C++ code:
use cc::Build;
fn main() {
Build::new()
.cpp(true)
.file("src/my_cpp_file.cpp")
.compile("my-cpp-library");
}
Getting Started
To use the cc-rs
library in your Rust project, add the following to your Cargo.toml
file:
[dependencies]
cc = "1.0"
Then, in your Rust code, you can import and use the cc
crate as shown in the examples above. The library's documentation provides more detailed information on the available configuration options and usage patterns.
Competitor Comparisons
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
Pros of ripgrep
- Faster and more efficient for searching large codebases
- Supports advanced search features like regex and file type filtering
- User-friendly command-line interface with colorized output
Cons of ripgrep
- Focused solely on text searching, less versatile than cc-rs
- Larger binary size due to its comprehensive feature set
- May have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with grep-like tools
Code Comparison
ripgrep example:
use grep_regex::RegexMatcher;
use grep_searcher::Searcher;
use grep_searcher::sinks::UTF8;
let matcher = RegexMatcher::new(r"foo.*bar").unwrap();
let mut searcher = Searcher::new();
cc-rs example:
use cc::Build;
fn main() {
Build::new()
.file("foo.c")
.compile("libfoo.a");
}
Summary
ripgrep is a powerful text search tool optimized for speed and efficiency, while cc-rs is a library for compiling C/C++/Assembly code. ripgrep excels in searching codebases quickly, whereas cc-rs provides a Rust interface for building native code. The choice between them depends on whether you need fast text searching capabilities or cross-compilation support for native code in your Rust projects.
A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'
Pros of fd
- User-friendly and intuitive command-line interface
- Faster performance for file searching operations
- Colorized output and smart case sensitivity by default
Cons of fd
- More limited in scope, focusing primarily on file searching
- Larger binary size due to Rust compilation
Code Comparison
fd:
let regex = RegexBuilder::new(&pattern)
.case_insensitive(case_sensitive == CaseSensitivity::Insensitive)
.build()
.map_err(|_| FdError::InvalidRegex)?;
cc-rs:
pub fn new() -> Tool {
Tool {
path: None,
cc_commands: Vec::new(),
ar_commands: Vec::new(),
env: Vec::new(),
family: None,
cuda: false,
out_dir: None,
}
}
Key Differences
fd is a user-focused tool for finding files and directories, while cc-rs is a library for build script integration with C/C++ compilers. fd prioritizes ease of use and speed for file operations, whereas cc-rs provides low-level control for compiler interactions.
fd's codebase focuses on efficient file system traversal and pattern matching, while cc-rs deals with compiler command construction and environment setup. The projects serve different purposes, with fd targeting end-users and cc-rs aimed at developers building Rust projects with C/C++ dependencies.
A cat(1) clone with wings.
Pros of bat
- User-friendly command-line tool for viewing and highlighting file contents
- Supports syntax highlighting for numerous programming languages
- Integrates well with Git for displaying file changes
Cons of bat
- More focused on file viewing rather than compilation or build processes
- Larger binary size due to included syntax highlighting definitions
- May require more system resources for complex syntax highlighting
Code comparison
bat:
pub fn run() -> Result<()> {
let config = Config::from_args()?;
let mut printer = Printer::new(&config);
printer.print_files()?;
Ok(())
}
cc-rs:
pub fn compile_objects<I, S>(&self, objects: I) -> Result<(), Error>
where
I: IntoIterator<Item = S>,
S: AsRef<OsStr>,
{
self.do_compile(objects, None)
}
Summary
bat is a user-friendly command-line tool for viewing and highlighting file contents, while cc-rs is a library for compiling C/C++ code and managing the build process. bat excels in providing a rich viewing experience with syntax highlighting, while cc-rs focuses on low-level compilation tasks. The code examples demonstrate bat's emphasis on file printing and cc-rs's compilation-oriented functionality.
A modern replacement for ‘ls’.
Pros of exa
- Designed as a modern replacement for the
ls
command, offering enhanced functionality and colorful output - Written in Rust, providing memory safety and performance benefits
- Actively maintained with regular updates and feature additions
Cons of exa
- More focused on a specific use case (file listing) compared to cc-rs's broader scope
- Larger binary size due to its feature-rich nature
- May have a steeper learning curve for users familiar with traditional
ls
command
Code Comparison
exa (main functionality):
pub fn print_dir(dir: &Dir, options: &Options) -> Result<()> {
let mut files = dir.files();
sort_files(&mut files, &options.sort_field, &options.sort_case_sensitive);
for file in files {
println!("{}", file.display(options));
}
Ok(())
}
cc-rs (core functionality):
pub fn compile(&self, file: &Path) -> Result<(), Error> {
let mut cmd = self.to_command(file);
run_command(cmd, "compile")
}
Both projects demonstrate Rust's strong typing and error handling, but exa focuses on file operations and display, while cc-rs deals with compilation processes.
A syntax-highlighting pager for git, diff, grep, and blame output
Pros of delta
- Specialized tool for enhancing diff output with syntax highlighting and line numbering
- User-friendly with customizable themes and options for improved readability
- Actively maintained with frequent updates and new features
Cons of delta
- More focused in scope, primarily for diff visualization
- Larger binary size due to its feature-rich nature
- May require additional configuration for optimal use
Code comparison
delta:
pub fn run() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
let opt = cli::process_command_line_arguments();
process::exit(delta::delta(opt)?);
}
cc-rs:
pub fn new() -> Build {
Build {
include_directories: Vec::new(),
definitions: Vec::new(),
objects: Vec::new(),
flags: Vec::new(),
// ...
}
}
Summary
Delta is a specialized tool for enhancing diff output, offering syntax highlighting and customizable themes. It's actively maintained and user-friendly but has a more focused scope compared to cc-rs. cc-rs, on the other hand, is a build configuration helper for C/C++ libraries, providing a broader range of functionality for compiling and linking. While Delta excels in improving diff readability, cc-rs offers more comprehensive build management features for C/C++ projects.
A full featured, fast Command Line Argument Parser for Rust
Pros of clap
- Specialized for command-line argument parsing, offering a more comprehensive and user-friendly API for this specific task
- Provides multiple ways to define CLI arguments, including builder pattern, derive macros, and YAML configuration
- Extensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to implement complex CLI interfaces
Cons of clap
- Larger dependency footprint, potentially increasing compile times and binary size
- Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set, which may be overkill for simple CLI applications
Code comparison
clap example:
use clap::Parser;
#[derive(Parser)]
struct Cli {
#[arg(short, long)]
name: String,
}
cc-rs example:
use cc::Build;
fn main() {
Build::new()
.file("foo.c")
.compile("libfoo.a");
}
Summary
clap is a specialized library for building command-line interfaces in Rust, offering a rich set of features and multiple ways to define arguments. cc-rs, on the other hand, is a library for compiling C/C++/Assembly code into Rust projects. While they serve different purposes, clap excels in CLI argument parsing but may be more complex for simple use cases, whereas cc-rs focuses on cross-compilation and integration of native code into Rust projects.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
cc-rs
A library for Cargo build scripts to compile a set of C/C++/assembly/CUDA files into a static archive for Cargo to link into the crate being built. This crate does not compile code itself; it calls out to the default compiler for the platform. This crate will automatically detect situations such as cross compilation and various environment variables and will build code appropriately.
Refer to the documentation for detailed usage instructions.
License
This project is licensed under either of
- Apache License, Version 2.0, (LICENSE-APACHE or https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
- MIT license (LICENSE-MIT or https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
at your option.
Contribution
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in cc-rs by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.
Top Related Projects
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'
A cat(1) clone with wings.
A modern replacement for ‘ls’.
A syntax-highlighting pager for git, diff, grep, and blame output
A full featured, fast Command Line Argument Parser for Rust
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot