regex
An implementation of regular expressions for Rust. This implementation uses finite automata and guarantees linear time matching on all inputs.
Top Related Projects
RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly alternative to backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, Perl, and Python. It is a C++ library.
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
Readline Implementation in Rust
A snapshot testing library for rust
Quick Overview
The rust-lang/regex repository contains an implementation of regular expressions for Rust. It provides a fast, safe, and feature-rich regex engine that is compatible with Perl-style regular expressions.
Pros
- High performance and efficiency
- Safe and memory-safe implementation
- Extensive feature set, including Unicode support
- Well-documented and actively maintained
Cons
- Learning curve for those new to Rust or regular expressions
- Some advanced features may have a performance impact
- Limited support for certain regex flavors (e.g., PCRE-specific features)
Code Examples
- Basic pattern matching:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
assert!(re.is_match("2022-03-14"));
assert!(!re.is_match("not-a-date"));
- Capturing groups:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"(\w+):(\d+)").unwrap();
let captures = re.captures("port:8080").unwrap();
assert_eq!(captures.get(1).unwrap().as_str(), "port");
assert_eq!(captures.get(2).unwrap().as_str(), "8080");
- Replacing matched patterns:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"(?P<y>\d{4})-(?P<m>\d{2})-(?P<d>\d{2})").unwrap();
let result = re.replace_all("2022-03-14", "$m/$d/$y");
assert_eq!(result, "03/14/2022");
Getting Started
To use the regex crate in your Rust project, add the following to your Cargo.toml
file:
[dependencies]
regex = "1.7"
Then, in your Rust code, you can import and use the regex functionality:
use regex::Regex;
fn main() {
let re = Regex::new(r"\b\w+\b").unwrap();
let text = "Hello, world!";
for word in re.find_iter(text) {
println!("Found word: {}", word.as_str());
}
}
This example creates a regex that matches whole words and prints each word found in the given text.
Competitor Comparisons
RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly alternative to backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, Perl, and Python. It is a C++ library.
Pros of re2
- Faster performance for complex regular expressions
- Guaranteed linear time complexity, avoiding catastrophic backtracking
- Supports Unicode and UTF-8 natively
Cons of re2
- More limited feature set compared to regex
- Less idiomatic Rust API, as it's a C++ library with bindings
- Larger binary size due to including the C++ library
Code Comparison
regex:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
assert!(re.is_match("2022-03-14"));
re2:
use re2::RE2;
let re = RE2::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
assert!(re.is_match("2022-03-14"));
Summary
regex is a pure Rust implementation offering a more idiomatic API and a richer feature set, while re2 provides better performance guarantees for complex patterns. regex is generally easier to use in Rust projects, but re2 may be preferable for scenarios involving potentially malicious or extremely complex regular expressions. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements, such as performance needs, feature requirements, and ease of integration with existing Rust codebases.
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
Pros of ripgrep
- Faster performance for searching large codebases
- Includes additional features like recursive directory searching and gitignore support
- Designed as a command-line tool, making it more user-friendly for direct use
Cons of ripgrep
- More focused on grep-like functionality rather than general-purpose regex operations
- Larger codebase and more dependencies, potentially making it harder to integrate into other projects
- May have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with command-line tools
Code Comparison
regex:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
assert!(re.is_match("2014-01-01"));
ripgrep:
use grep_regex::RegexMatcher;
use grep_searcher::Searcher;
let matcher = RegexMatcher::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
let mut searcher = Searcher::new();
searcher.search_path(&matcher, "file.txt", |_| Ok(true)).unwrap();
While regex is primarily a library for working with regular expressions, ripgrep is a command-line tool that uses regular expressions for searching. The code comparison shows how regex is used directly for pattern matching, while ripgrep requires additional setup for searching files. Both projects are written in Rust and provide powerful regex capabilities, but they serve different primary purposes.
Readline Implementation in Rust
Pros of rustyline
- Focused on providing readline-like functionality for Rust applications
- Offers a more interactive and user-friendly command-line experience
- Includes features like history management and custom key bindings
Cons of rustyline
- More limited in scope compared to regex's broad text processing capabilities
- May have a steeper learning curve for developers not familiar with readline concepts
- Less widely used and potentially fewer community contributions
Code Comparison
regex:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
assert!(re.is_match("2014-01-01"));
rustyline:
use rustyline::Editor;
let mut rl = Editor::<()>::new();
let readline = rl.readline(">> ");
match readline {
Ok(line) => println!("Line: {}", line),
Err(_) => println!("No input"),
}
Summary
While regex focuses on pattern matching and text processing, rustyline specializes in providing an interactive command-line interface. regex is more versatile for general text manipulation tasks, whereas rustyline excels in creating user-friendly CLI applications. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project. If you need powerful text processing capabilities, regex is the better option. For building interactive command-line tools with features like history and custom key bindings, rustyline would be more suitable.
A snapshot testing library for rust
Pros of insta
- Specialized for snapshot testing, offering a more focused and user-friendly approach for this specific use case
- Provides intuitive CLI tools for managing and reviewing snapshots
- Supports inline snapshots, making it easier to maintain tests alongside code
Cons of insta
- Limited to snapshot testing, whereas regex offers broader text processing capabilities
- May require more setup and configuration for complex testing scenarios
- Less mature and widely adopted compared to the well-established regex library
Code Comparison
insta:
#[test]
fn test_function() {
let result = function_to_test();
insta::assert_snapshot!(result);
}
regex:
use regex::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}$").unwrap();
assert!(re.is_match("2014-01-01"));
Summary
While regex is a versatile library for pattern matching and text processing, insta focuses specifically on snapshot testing. insta provides a more streamlined experience for this particular use case, with features like inline snapshots and CLI tools. However, it lacks the broader functionality of regex and may require more setup for complex scenarios. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project, with regex being more suitable for general text processing and insta excelling in snapshot testing workflows.
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual CopilotREADME
regex
This crate provides routines for searching strings for matches of a regular
expression (aka "regex"). The regex syntax supported by this crate is similar
to other regex engines, but it lacks several features that are not known how to
implement efficiently. This includes, but is not limited to, look-around and
backreferences. In exchange, all regex searches in this crate have worst case
O(m * n)
time complexity, where m
is proportional to the size of the regex
and n
is proportional to the size of the string being searched.
Documentation
Module documentation with examples. The module documentation also includes a comprehensive description of the syntax supported.
Documentation with examples for the various matching functions and iterators
can be found on the
Regex
type.
Usage
To bring this crate into your repository, either add regex
to your
Cargo.toml
, or run cargo add regex
.
Here's a simple example that matches a date in YYYY-MM-DD format and prints the year, month and day:
use regex::Regex;
fn main() {
let re = Regex::new(r"(?x)
(?P<year>\d{4}) # the year
-
(?P<month>\d{2}) # the month
-
(?P<day>\d{2}) # the day
").unwrap();
let caps = re.captures("2010-03-14").unwrap();
assert_eq!("2010", &caps["year"]);
assert_eq!("03", &caps["month"]);
assert_eq!("14", &caps["day"]);
}
If you have lots of dates in text that you'd like to iterate over, then it's easy to adapt the above example with an iterator:
use regex::Regex;
fn main() {
let re = Regex::new(r"(\d{4})-(\d{2})-(\d{2})").unwrap();
let hay = "On 2010-03-14, foo happened. On 2014-10-14, bar happened.";
let mut dates = vec![];
for (_, [year, month, day]) in re.captures_iter(hay).map(|c| c.extract()) {
dates.push((year, month, day));
}
assert_eq!(dates, vec![
("2010", "03", "14"),
("2014", "10", "14"),
]);
}
Usage: Avoid compiling the same regex in a loop
It is an anti-pattern to compile the same regular expression in a loop since compilation is typically expensive. (It takes anywhere from a few microseconds to a few milliseconds depending on the size of the regex.) Not only is compilation itself expensive, but this also prevents optimizations that reuse allocations internally to the matching engines.
In Rust, it can sometimes be a pain to pass regular expressions around if
they're used from inside a helper function. Instead, we recommend using the
once_cell
crate to ensure that
regular expressions are compiled exactly once. For example:
use {
once_cell::sync::Lazy,
regex::Regex,
};
fn some_helper_function(haystack: &str) -> bool {
static RE: Lazy<Regex> = Lazy::new(|| Regex::new(r"...").unwrap());
RE.is_match(haystack)
}
fn main() {
assert!(some_helper_function("abc"));
assert!(!some_helper_function("ac"));
}
Specifically, in this example, the regex will be compiled when it is used for the first time. On subsequent uses, it will reuse the previous compilation.
Usage: match regular expressions on &[u8]
The main API of this crate (regex::Regex
) requires the caller to pass a
&str
for searching. In Rust, an &str
is required to be valid UTF-8, which
means the main API can't be used for searching arbitrary bytes.
To match on arbitrary bytes, use the regex::bytes::Regex
API. The API is
identical to the main API, except that it takes an &[u8]
to search on instead
of an &str
. The &[u8]
APIs also permit disabling Unicode mode in the regex
even when the pattern would match invalid UTF-8. For example, (?-u:.)
is
not allowed in regex::Regex
but is allowed in regex::bytes::Regex
since
(?-u:.)
matches any byte except for \n
. Conversely, .
will match the
UTF-8 encoding of any Unicode scalar value except for \n
.
This example shows how to find all null-terminated strings in a slice of bytes:
use regex::bytes::Regex;
let re = Regex::new(r"(?-u)(?<cstr>[^\x00]+)\x00").unwrap();
let text = b"foo\xFFbar\x00baz\x00";
// Extract all of the strings without the null terminator from each match.
// The unwrap is OK here since a match requires the `cstr` capture to match.
let cstrs: Vec<&[u8]> =
re.captures_iter(text)
.map(|c| c.name("cstr").unwrap().as_bytes())
.collect();
assert_eq!(vec![&b"foo\xFFbar"[..], &b"baz"[..]], cstrs);
Notice here that the [^\x00]+
will match any byte except for NUL
,
including bytes like \xFF
which are not valid UTF-8. When using the main API,
[^\x00]+
would instead match any valid UTF-8 sequence except for NUL
.
Usage: match multiple regular expressions simultaneously
This demonstrates how to use a RegexSet
to match multiple (possibly
overlapping) regular expressions in a single scan of the search text:
use regex::RegexSet;
let set = RegexSet::new(&[
r"\w+",
r"\d+",
r"\pL+",
r"foo",
r"bar",
r"barfoo",
r"foobar",
]).unwrap();
// Iterate over and collect all of the matches.
let matches: Vec<_> = set.matches("foobar").into_iter().collect();
assert_eq!(matches, vec![0, 2, 3, 4, 6]);
// You can also test whether a particular regex matched:
let matches = set.matches("foobar");
assert!(!matches.matched(5));
assert!(matches.matched(6));
Usage: regex internals as a library
The regex-automata
directory contains a crate that
exposes all of the internal matching engines used by the regex
crate. The
idea is that the regex
crate exposes a simple API for 99% of use cases, but
regex-automata
exposes oodles of customizable behaviors.
Documentation for regex-automata
.
Usage: a regular expression parser
This repository contains a crate that provides a well tested regular expression parser, abstract syntax and a high-level intermediate representation for convenient analysis. It provides no facilities for compilation or execution. This may be useful if you're implementing your own regex engine or otherwise need to do analysis on the syntax of a regular expression. It is otherwise not recommended for general use.
Documentation for regex-syntax
.
Crate features
This crate comes with several features that permit tweaking the trade off between binary size, compilation time and runtime performance. Users of this crate can selectively disable Unicode tables, or choose from a variety of optimizations performed by this crate to disable.
When all of these features are disabled, runtime match performance may be much
worse, but if you're matching on short strings, or if high performance isn't
necessary, then such a configuration is perfectly serviceable. To disable
all such features, use the following Cargo.toml
dependency configuration:
[dependencies.regex]
version = "1.3"
default-features = false
# Unless you have a specific reason not to, it's good sense to enable standard
# library support. It enables several optimizations and avoids spin locks. It
# also shouldn't meaningfully impact compile times or binary size.
features = ["std"]
This will reduce the dependency tree of regex
down to two crates:
regex-syntax
and regex-automata
.
The full set of features one can disable are in the "Crate features" section of the documentation.
Performance
One of the goals of this crate is for the regex engine to be "fast." What that
is a somewhat nebulous goal, it is usually interpreted in one of two ways.
First, it means that all searches take worst case O(m * n)
time, where
m
is proportional to len(regex)
and n
is proportional to len(haystack)
.
Second, it means that even aside from the time complexity constraint, regex
searches are "fast" in practice.
While the first interpretation is pretty unambiguous, the second one remains nebulous. While nebulous, it guides this crate's architecture and the sorts of the trade offs it makes. For example, here are some general architectural statements that follow as a result of the goal to be "fast":
- When given the choice between faster regex searches and faster Rust compile times, this crate will generally choose faster regex searches.
- When given the choice between faster regex searches and faster regex compile
times, this crate will generally choose faster regex searches. That is, it is
generally acceptable for
Regex::new
to get a little slower if it means that searches get faster. (This is a somewhat delicate balance to strike, because the speed ofRegex::new
needs to remain somewhat reasonable. But this is why one should avoid re-compiling the same regex over and over again.) - When given the choice between faster regex searches and simpler API
design, this crate will generally choose faster regex searches. For example,
if one didn't care about performance, we could like get rid of both of
the
Regex::is_match
andRegex::find
APIs and instead just rely onRegex::captures
.
There are perhaps more ways that being "fast" influences things.
While this repository used to provide its own benchmark suite, it has since
been moved to rebar. The benchmarks are
quite extensive, and there are many more than what is shown in rebar's README
(which is just limited to a "curated" set meant to compare performance between
regex engines). To run all of this crate's benchmarks, first start by cloning
and installing rebar
:
$ git clone https://github.com/BurntSushi/rebar
$ cd rebar
$ cargo install --path ./
Then build the benchmark harness for just this crate:
$ rebar build -e '^rust/regex$'
Run all benchmarks for this crate as tests (each benchmark is executed once to ensure it works):
$ rebar measure -e '^rust/regex$' -t
Record measurements for all benchmarks and save them to a CSV file:
$ rebar measure -e '^rust/regex$' | tee results.csv
Explore benchmark timings:
$ rebar cmp results.csv
See the rebar
documentation for more details on how it works and how to
compare results with other regex engines.
Hacking
The regex
crate is, for the most part, a pretty thin wrapper around the
meta::Regex
from the
regex-automata
crate.
Therefore, if you're looking to work on the internals of this crate, you'll
likely either want to look in regex-syntax
(for parsing) or regex-automata
(for construction of finite automata and the search routines).
My blog on regex internals goes into more depth.
Minimum Rust version policy
This crate's minimum supported rustc
version is 1.65.0
.
The policy is that the minimum Rust version required to use this crate can be
increased in minor version updates. For example, if regex 1.0 requires Rust
1.20.0, then regex 1.0.z for all values of z
will also require Rust 1.20.0 or
newer. However, regex 1.y for y > 0
may require a newer minimum version of
Rust.
License
This project is licensed under either of
- Apache License, Version 2.0, (LICENSE-APACHE or https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
- MIT license (LICENSE-MIT or https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
at your option.
The data in regex-syntax/src/unicode_tables/
is licensed under the Unicode
License Agreement
(LICENSE-UNICODE).
Top Related Projects
RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly alternative to backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, Perl, and Python. It is a C++ library.
ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
Readline Implementation in Rust
A snapshot testing library for rust
Convert designs to code with AI
Introducing Visual Copilot: A new AI model to turn Figma designs to high quality code using your components.
Try Visual Copilot