Pros of Vue

• Comprehensive framework for building entire web applications
• Larger ecosystem with more plugins, tools, and community support
• More flexible and suitable for complex, large-scale projects

Cons of Vue

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Potentially overkill for simple projects or single components
• Requires more setup and configuration

Code Comparison

Vue (basic component):

<template>
  <div>{{ message }}</div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      message: 'Hello Vue!'
    }
  }
}
</script>

vue-good-table (basic table):

<template>
  <vue-good-table
    :columns="columns"
    :rows="rows"/>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      columns: [
        { label: 'Name', field: 'name' },
        { label: 'Age', field: 'age', type: 'number' },
      ],
      rows: [
        { name: 'John', age: 30 },
        { name: 'Jane', age: 28 },
      ]
    }
  }
}
</script>

Vue is a full-fledged framework for building web applications, while vue-good-table is a specific component for creating tables. Vue offers more flexibility and power for complex projects, but may be excessive for simple table needs. vue-good-table provides a quick and easy solution for tables with less setup required, but is limited to that specific use case.

Pros of element

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of components beyond tables
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Customizable themes and internationalization support

Cons of element

• Larger bundle size due to its comprehensive nature
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to the library
• May require more configuration for simple use cases

Code Comparison

element:

<el-table :data="tableData" style="width: 100%">
  <el-table-column prop="date" label="Date" width="180"></el-table-column>
  <el-table-column prop="name" label="Name" width="180"></el-table-column>
  <el-table-column prop="address" label="Address"></el-table-column>
</el-table>

vue-good-table:

<vue-good-table :columns="columns" :rows="rows">
</vue-good-table>

Summary

element is a comprehensive UI library offering a wide range of components, extensive documentation, and customization options. However, it may be overkill for projects that only need a table component. vue-good-table, on the other hand, is focused solely on providing a powerful and flexible table component, making it more lightweight and easier to implement for table-specific use cases. The choice between the two depends on the project's requirements and the developer's preference for a full-featured UI library versus a specialized table component.

Pros of vue-element-admin

• Comprehensive admin panel solution with a wide range of pre-built components and features
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Includes advanced features like permission control and internationalization

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive feature set
• May be overkill for smaller projects or those requiring only table functionality
• Larger bundle size and potential performance impact for simpler applications

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin (complex table example):

<el-table
  :data="list"
  v-loading="listLoading"
  element-loading-text="Loading"
  border
  fit
  highlight-current-row
>
  <el-table-column align="center" label="ID" width="95">
    <template slot-scope="scope">
      {{ scope.$index }}
    </template>
  </el-table-column>
  <!-- More columns... -->
</el-table>

vue-good-table (simple table example):

<vue-good-table
  :columns="columns"
  :rows="rows"
  :pagination-options="{
    enabled: true,
    perPage: 10
  }"
>
</vue-good-table>

vue-element-admin offers a more feature-rich and complex table implementation, while vue-good-table provides a simpler, more focused table component. The choice between them depends on the project's specific requirements and complexity.

Pros of Buefy

• Comprehensive UI component library based on Bulma CSS framework
• Offers a wide range of components beyond tables (buttons, forms, modals, etc.)
• Active development and community support

Cons of Buefy

• Larger bundle size due to its comprehensive nature
• May require more setup and configuration for specific use cases
• Learning curve for Bulma CSS framework if not already familiar

Code Comparison

Vue-good-table:

<vue-good-table
  :columns="columns"
  :rows="rows"
  :search-options="{
    enabled: true
  }"
/>

Buefy:

<b-table
  :data="data"
  :columns="columns"
  :searchable="true"
  :paginated="true"
>
</b-table>

Summary

Vue-good-table is a focused table component library, while Buefy is a comprehensive UI framework. Vue-good-table may be more suitable for projects that only need table functionality, offering a simpler implementation. Buefy provides a wider range of components and is based on Bulma, making it a good choice for projects that require a complete UI solution. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your project and your familiarity with the underlying frameworks.

Pros of bootstrap-vue

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of elements
• Seamless integration with Bootstrap's grid system and utility classes
• Active development and large community support

Cons of bootstrap-vue

• Larger bundle size due to the full Bootstrap framework
• Less flexibility in customizing table-specific features
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Bootstrap

Code Comparison

bootstrap-vue table example:

<b-table
  :items="items"
  :fields="fields"
  striped
  hover
  responsive="sm"
></b-table>

vue-good-table example:

<vue-good-table
  :columns="columns"
  :rows="rows"
  :search-options="{
    enabled: true
  }"
></vue-good-table>

Summary

bootstrap-vue offers a comprehensive UI toolkit with Bootstrap integration, making it suitable for larger projects requiring a consistent design system. However, it may be overkill for simpler applications or those focused primarily on table functionality.

vue-good-table, on the other hand, provides a more focused solution for creating feature-rich tables in Vue.js applications. It offers greater flexibility in table customization but lacks the broader UI component ecosystem of bootstrap-vue.

Choose bootstrap-vue for full-fledged UI development with Bootstrap, or opt for vue-good-table if you need a lightweight, table-specific solution with advanced features.

Pros of ant-design-vue

• Comprehensive UI component library with a wide range of components
• Follows Ant Design specifications, providing a consistent and professional look
• Active development and large community support

Cons of ant-design-vue

• Larger bundle size due to the extensive component library
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Ant Design principles
• Less flexibility in customizing individual components compared to vue-good-table

Code Comparison

vue-good-table:

<vue-good-table
  :columns="columns"
  :rows="rows"
  :search-options="{
    enabled: true
  }"
/>

ant-design-vue:

<a-table
  :columns="columns"
  :dataSource="dataSource"
  :pagination="{ pageSize: 10 }"
>
  <template #headerCell="{ column }">
    <a-input-search placeholder="Search" @search="onSearch(column)" />
  </template>
</a-table>

Summary

ant-design-vue offers a comprehensive UI library with consistent design, while vue-good-table focuses specifically on table functionality. ant-design-vue provides more components but has a larger footprint, while vue-good-table is lighter and more specialized. The choice between them depends on project requirements and whether a full UI library or a dedicated table component is needed.