LoadingDrawable

Pros of awesome-android-ui

• Comprehensive collection of UI/UX libraries and resources
• Regularly updated with new contributions from the community
• Covers a wide range of UI components and design patterns

Cons of awesome-android-ui

• Not a standalone library, requires additional implementation effort
• May include outdated or deprecated libraries
• No direct code examples or implementation guidelines

Code comparison

LoadingDrawable:

CircularJumpDrawable jumpDrawable = new CircularJumpDrawable.Builder(this)
    .setColors(COLORS)
    .setDuration(2000)
    .build();
imageView.setImageDrawable(jumpDrawable);
jumpDrawable.start();

awesome-android-ui: No direct code comparison available as it's a curated list of libraries rather than a standalone library.

Summary

LoadingDrawable is a focused library for creating loading animations, while awesome-android-ui is a comprehensive collection of UI libraries and resources. LoadingDrawable provides ready-to-use loading drawables with customization options, whereas awesome-android-ui offers a wide range of UI components but requires additional implementation effort. LoadingDrawable is more suitable for specific loading animation needs, while awesome-android-ui serves as a valuable reference for various UI/UX solutions in Android development.

Pros of AVLoadingIndicatorView

• Offers a wider variety of pre-built loading animations (26 different styles)
• Easier to implement with minimal code required
• Supports both Java and Kotlin

Cons of AVLoadingIndicatorView

• Less customizable compared to LoadingDrawable
• Limited to predefined animation styles
• May have a larger impact on app size due to more built-in animations

Code Comparison

AVLoadingIndicatorView implementation:

val indicator = findViewById<AVLoadingIndicatorView>(R.id.avi)
indicator.show()
// To hide the indicator
// indicator.hide()

LoadingDrawable implementation:

val imageView = findViewById<ImageView>(R.id.image_view)
val circleJumpDrawable = CircleJumpDrawable.Builder(this).build()
imageView.setImageDrawable(circleJumpDrawable)
circleJumpDrawable.start()

AVLoadingIndicatorView provides a simpler implementation with built-in animations, while LoadingDrawable offers more flexibility for custom animations but requires more code to set up.

Both libraries are useful for adding loading animations to Android applications, but the choice between them depends on the specific needs of the project. AVLoadingIndicatorView is better for quick implementation of predefined animations, while LoadingDrawable is more suitable for developers who need fine-grained control over their loading animations.

Pros of Android-SpinKit

• Offers a wider variety of loading animations (over 30 styles)
• Easier to implement with minimal code required
• Supports both programmatic and XML-based implementation

Cons of Android-SpinKit

• Less customizable compared to LoadingDrawable
• Limited to predefined animation styles
• May have a larger impact on app size due to more included resources

Code Comparison

LoadingDrawable implementation:

LoadingDrawable loadingDrawable = new CircularJumpLoadingRenderer(this);
ImageView imageView = findViewById(R.id.image_view);
imageView.setImageDrawable(loadingDrawable);
loadingDrawable.start();

Android-SpinKit implementation:

SpinKitView spinKitView = findViewById(R.id.spin_kit);
Sprite doubleBounce = new DoubleBounce();
spinKitView.setIndeterminateDrawable(doubleBounce);

Both libraries provide easy-to-use loading animations for Android applications. LoadingDrawable offers more customization options and flexibility in creating custom animations, while Android-SpinKit provides a larger selection of pre-built animations with simpler implementation. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project, such as the desired level of customization and the variety of animation styles required.

Pros of LoadingView

• Offers a wider variety of loading animations and styles
• Provides more customization options for colors and sizes
• Easier to implement with simpler API and less boilerplate code

Cons of LoadingView

• Less optimized for performance compared to LoadingDrawable
• Documentation is not as comprehensive
• Fewer options for fine-tuning animation behavior

Code Comparison

LoadingView implementation:

LVCircularRing loadingView = new LVCircularRing(this, null);
mLayout.addView(loadingView);
loadingView.startAnim();

LoadingDrawable implementation:

ImageView imageView = (ImageView) findViewById(R.id.image);
CircularProgressDrawable circularProgressDrawable = new CircularProgressDrawable(Color.WHITE, 8);
imageView.setImageDrawable(circularProgressDrawable);
circularProgressDrawable.start();

LoadingView offers a more straightforward implementation with fewer lines of code, while LoadingDrawable requires more setup but provides more control over the drawable's appearance and behavior.

Both libraries serve similar purposes, providing loading animations for Android applications. LoadingView excels in variety and ease of use, while LoadingDrawable focuses on performance and fine-grained control. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project, such as the desired level of customization, performance needs, and development time constraints.

Pros of android-shapeLoadingView

• Simpler implementation with fewer customization options, making it easier to use for basic loading animations
• Focuses on shape-based animations, which can be visually appealing and lightweight
• Smaller library size, potentially reducing app bloat

Cons of android-shapeLoadingView

• Limited variety of loading animations compared to LoadingDrawable
• Less flexibility in customizing animation properties and behaviors
• Fewer updates and maintenance, with the last commit being several years old

Code Comparison

LoadingDrawable:

CircleLoadingDrawable circleLoadingDrawable = new CircleLoadingDrawable(this);
circleLoadingDrawable.setStrokeWidth(8);
circleLoadingDrawable.setColor(Color.WHITE);
imageView.setImageDrawable(circleLoadingDrawable);

android-shapeLoadingView:

ShapeLoadingDialog shapeLoadingDialog = new ShapeLoadingDialog(this);
shapeLoadingDialog.setLoadingText("Loading...");
shapeLoadingDialog.show();

LoadingDrawable offers more granular control over the loading animation's appearance, while android-shapeLoadingView provides a simpler, dialog-based implementation. LoadingDrawable allows for direct manipulation of the drawable properties, whereas android-shapeLoadingView focuses on creating a pre-configured dialog with shape animations.

Both libraries serve the purpose of displaying loading animations, but LoadingDrawable offers more extensive customization options and a wider variety of animation styles. android-shapeLoadingView, on the other hand, provides a quicker implementation for basic shape-based loading indicators.

Pros of Loading

• More customizable with various loading styles and animations
• Supports both Android and iOS platforms
• Easier integration with existing projects due to simpler API

Cons of Loading

• Less actively maintained (last update was 5 years ago)
• Fewer animation options compared to LoadingDrawable
• Limited documentation and examples

Code Comparison

LoadingDrawable:

CircleLoadingDrawable circleDrawable = new CircleLoadingDrawable(this);
circleDrawable.setColors(new int[]{Color.RED, Color.GREEN, Color.BLUE});
imageView.setImageDrawable(circleDrawable);

Loading:

LoadingView loadingView = new LoadingView(this);
loadingView.setLoadingText("Loading...");
loadingView.setLoadingColor(Color.BLUE);
layout.addView(loadingView);

Both libraries offer simple ways to implement loading animations, but LoadingDrawable provides more granular control over the animation style and colors. Loading, on the other hand, offers a more straightforward API for quick integration.

While LoadingDrawable focuses solely on Android, Loading supports both Android and iOS platforms, making it a better choice for cross-platform development. However, LoadingDrawable is more actively maintained and offers a wider variety of animation options.