Pros of mybatis-plus

• Simpler and more lightweight, focusing specifically on MyBatis enhancement
• Extensive code generation capabilities for rapid development
• Strong community support and frequent updates

Cons of mybatis-plus

• Less comprehensive than hsweb-framework, which offers a full-stack solution
• May require additional libraries for features like security and authorization
• Limited built-in support for complex business logic implementations

Code Comparison

mybatis-plus:

@TableName("user")
public class User {
    @TableId(type = IdType.AUTO)
    private Long id;
    private String name;
    private Integer age;
}

hsweb-framework:

@Table(name = "s_user")
public class User extends GenericEntity<String> {
    @Column(length = 128)
    private String name;
    @Column
    private Integer age;
}

Both frameworks simplify entity definitions, but mybatis-plus uses annotations specific to its ecosystem, while hsweb-framework leverages more standard JPA annotations. mybatis-plus focuses on database-related features, whereas hsweb-framework provides a broader set of annotations and utilities for building enterprise applications.

Pros of JeecgBoot

• More comprehensive out-of-the-box features, including a code generator and low-code development platform
• Stronger focus on rapid application development and prototyping
• Larger community and more frequent updates

Cons of JeecgBoot

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially more complex codebase, which may impact customization and maintenance
• Heavier framework with more dependencies

Code Comparison

JeecgBoot example (controller):

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/test")
@Slf4j
public class TestController {
    @GetMapping(value = "/hello")
    public Result<String> hello() {
        Result<String> result = new Result<String>();
        result.setResult("Hello World!");
        return result;
    }
}

hsweb-framework example (controller):

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/test")
public class TestController {
    @GetMapping("/hello")
    public ResponseEntity<String> hello() {
        return ResponseEntity.ok("Hello World!");
    }
}

Both frameworks provide similar basic functionality, but JeecgBoot includes additional features like built-in Result wrapper and logging annotations. hsweb-framework's approach is more lightweight and closer to standard Spring Boot conventions.

Pros of eladmin

• More focused on admin panel functionality, providing a comprehensive solution for backend management systems
• Offers a modern and user-friendly UI with Vue.js frontend
• Includes built-in user management, role-based access control, and data dictionary features

Cons of eladmin

• Less flexible and customizable compared to hsweb-framework's modular architecture
• Smaller community and fewer contributors, potentially leading to slower development and issue resolution
• More opinionated in its approach, which may not suit all project requirements

Code Comparison

eladmin (Java):

@Data
@Entity
@Table(name="sys_user")
public class User extends BaseEntity implements Serializable {
    @Column(unique = true)
    private String username;
    private String password;
    private String email;
    private String phone;
}

hsweb-framework (Java):

@Table(name = "s_user")
public interface UserEntity extends Entity {
    @Property(column = "username")
    String getUsername();
    void setUsername(String username);
    @Property(column = "password")
    String getPassword();
    void setPassword(String password);
}

Both frameworks use annotations for entity mapping, but hsweb-framework employs interfaces for entities, potentially offering more flexibility in implementation.

Pros of spring-boot-api-project-seed

• Lightweight and focused on providing a basic structure for RESTful API projects
• Includes Swagger for API documentation out of the box
• Simpler learning curve for developers new to Spring Boot

Cons of spring-boot-api-project-seed

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to hsweb-framework
• Limited built-in security features
• Fewer advanced components for complex enterprise applications

Code Comparison

hsweb-framework:

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/user")
public class UserController implements SimpleGenericEntityController<User, String> {
    @Autowired
    private UserService userService;

    @Override
    public CrudService<User, String> getService() {
        return userService;
    }
}

spring-boot-api-project-seed:

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/users")
public class UserController {
    @Autowired
    private UserService userService;

    @PostMapping
    public Result add(@RequestBody User user) {
        userService.save(user);
        return ResultGenerator.genSuccessResult();
    }
}

The code comparison shows that hsweb-framework uses a more generic approach with interfaces, while spring-boot-api-project-seed opts for a simpler, more straightforward implementation. hsweb-framework's approach allows for more reusable and extensible code, but may have a steeper learning curve. spring-boot-api-project-seed's approach is more intuitive for beginners but may require more boilerplate code for complex scenarios.

Pros of ruoyi-vue-pro

• More comprehensive documentation and guides for developers
• Includes a Vue.js-based frontend, offering a complete full-stack solution
• Active community with frequent updates and contributions

Cons of ruoyi-vue-pro

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier resource consumption for smaller projects
• Less flexibility for customization compared to hsweb-framework

Code Comparison

ruoyi-vue-pro:

@PreAuthorize("@ss.hasPermission('system:user:list')")
@GetMapping("/list")
public TableDataInfo list(SysUser user) {
    startPage();
    List<SysUser> list = userService.selectUserList(user);
    return getDataTable(list);
}

hsweb-framework:

@GetMapping
@Authorize(action = Permission.ACTION_QUERY)
public Mono<PagerResult<UserEntity>> list(QueryParamEntity query) {
    return userService.queryPager(query);
}

The code snippets demonstrate different approaches to user list retrieval and authorization. ruoyi-vue-pro uses Spring Security's @PreAuthorize annotation, while hsweb-framework employs its custom @Authorize annotation. ruoyi-vue-pro's implementation includes pagination, whereas hsweb-framework uses reactive programming with Mono.

Both frameworks offer robust solutions for enterprise applications, with ruoyi-vue-pro providing a more opinionated, full-stack approach and hsweb-framework offering greater flexibility for customization.

Pros of spring-boot-demo

• More comprehensive and diverse set of examples covering various Spring Boot features
• Better organized structure with separate modules for different functionalities
• More active development and frequent updates

Cons of spring-boot-demo

• Lacks a cohesive framework approach, focusing more on individual examples
• May be overwhelming for beginners due to the large number of modules
• Less focus on enterprise-level features compared to hsweb-framework

Code Comparison

spring-boot-demo:

@SpringBootApplication
@EnableCaching
public class SpringBootDemoCacheRedisApplication {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(SpringBootDemoCacheRedisApplication.class, args);
    }
}

hsweb-framework:

@Configuration
@ComponentScan(basePackages = "org.hswebframework.web")
@MapperScan(basePackages = "org.hswebframework.web.dao")
@EnableAspectJAutoProxy
@EnableTransactionManagement
public class DefaultSystemConfiguration {
    // Configuration details
}

The code comparison shows that spring-boot-demo focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while hsweb-framework provides a more comprehensive configuration setup for enterprise applications. spring-boot-demo's approach is more suitable for learning and quick prototyping, whereas hsweb-framework is geared towards building robust, scalable systems.