Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wider range of pre-built components and layouts
• Larger community and more frequent updates, resulting in better long-term support and maintenance
• Extensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started and implement complex features

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier and slower performance compared to eladmin's lightweight approach
• May require more customization and code removal for simpler projects

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin (Vue.js):

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'
import Layout from '@/layout'

Vue.use(Router)

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/login',
    component: () => import('@/views/login/index'),
    hidden: true
  }
]

eladmin (Java Spring Boot):

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/users")
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class UserController {
    private final UserService userService;

    @GetMapping
    public ResponseEntity<Object> getUsers() {
        return new ResponseEntity<>(userService.queryAll(), HttpStatus.OK);
    }
}

This comparison highlights the different approaches and technologies used by these projects. vue-element-admin focuses on front-end development with Vue.js, while eladmin is a full-stack solution using Java Spring Boot for the backend and Vue.js for the frontend.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More active development with frequent updates and contributions
• Extensive documentation and examples for easier implementation
• Larger community support and user base

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex features
• Potentially heavier resource usage for smaller projects
• Less focus on backend integration compared to eladmin

Code Comparison

eladmin (Java):

@Data
@Entity
@Table(name="sys_user")
public class User implements Serializable {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    @Column(name = "user_id")
    private Long id;

vue-admin-better (JavaScript):

export default {
  name: 'User',
  data() {
    return {
      form: {
        username: '',
        password: '',
      },
    }
  },

The code snippets show different approaches to user management. eladmin uses Java with JPA annotations for database mapping, while vue-admin-better focuses on frontend Vue.js components for user interaction. This reflects the different emphases of the two projects, with eladmin providing a more comprehensive backend solution and vue-admin-better concentrating on the frontend user experience.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better TypeScript support and integration
• More active development and frequent updates

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Larger bundle size and potentially slower initial load times

Code Comparison

eladmin (Java):

@Data
@Entity
@Table(name="sys_user")
public class User implements Serializable {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
    @Column(name = "user_id")
    private Long id;
    
    private String username;
}

vue-vben-admin (TypeScript):

export interface UserInfo {
  userId: string | number;
  username: string;
  realName: string;
  avatar: string;
  desc?: string;
  homePath?: string;
  roles: RoleInfo[];
}

The code snippets show different approaches to defining user entities. eladmin uses Java with JPA annotations for database mapping, while vue-vben-admin uses TypeScript interfaces for type definitions. This reflects the different tech stacks and focuses of the two projects.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to learn and implement
• Focuses solely on the frontend, allowing for more flexibility in backend choices
• Provides a clean and modern UI design out of the box

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive than eladmin, which offers both frontend and backend solutions
• Fewer built-in features and integrations compared to eladmin
• May require more custom development for complex enterprise applications

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system (Vue.js component):

<template>
    <div class="sidebar">
        <el-menu class="sidebar-el-menu" :default-active="onRoutes" :collapse="collapse" background-color="#324157"
            text-color="#bfcbd9" active-text-color="#20a0ff" unique-opened router>
            <template v-for="item in items">
                <template v-if="item.subs">
                    <el-submenu :index="item.index" :key="item.index">
                        <template #title>
                            <i :class="item.icon"></i><span>{{ item.title }}</span>
                        </template>
                        <template v-for="subItem in item.subs">
                            <el-submenu v-if="subItem.subs" :index="subItem.index" :key="subItem.index">
                                <template #title>{{ subItem.title }}</template>
                                <el-menu-item v-for="(threeItem, i) in subItem.subs" :key="i" :index="threeItem.index">
                                    {{ threeItem.title }}
                                </el-menu-item>
                            </el-submenu>
                            <el-menu-item v-else :index="subItem.index" :key="subItem.index">
                                {{ subItem.title }}
                            </el-menu-item>
                        </template>
                    </el-submenu>
                </template>
                <template v-else>
                    <el-menu-item :index="item.index" :key="item.index">
                        <i :class="item.icon"></i><span>{{ item.title }}</span>
                    </el-menu-item>
                </template>
            </template>
        </el-menu>
    </div>
</template>

eladmin (Java backend code):

@Log
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/users")
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class UserController {

    private final UserService userService;
    private final DataScope dataScope;
    private final DeptService deptService;
    private final RoleService roleService;
    private final VerificationCodeService verificationCodeService;

    @ApiOperation("Query user")
    @GetMapping
    @PreAuthorize("@el.check('user:list')")
    public ResponseEntity<Object> query(UserQueryCriteria criteria, Pageable pageable){
        if (!ObjectUtils.isEmpty(criteria.getDeptId())) {
            criteria.getDeptIds().add(criteria.getDeptId());
            criteria.getDeptIds().addAll(deptService.getDeptChildren(criteria.getDeptId(),
                    criteria.getDeptIds()));
        }
        // Data permission
        List<Long> dataScopes = dataScope.getDeptIds(userService.findByName(SecurityUtils.getCurrentUsername()));
        // Criteria add data permissions
        if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(criteria.getDeptIds()) && !CollectionUtils.isEmpty(dataScopes)){
            // Take the intersection
            criteria.getDeptIds().retainAll(dataScopes);
            if(!CollectionUtil.isEmpty(criteria.getDeptIds())){
                return new ResponseEntity<>(userService.queryAll(criteria,pageable),HttpStatus.OK);
            }
        } else {
            // If the user's data permissions are empty, return an empty list
            if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(dataScopes)) {
                return new ResponseEntity<>(PageUtil.toPage(null,0),HttpStatus.OK

Pros of iview-admin

• Built on Vue.js and iView UI components, offering a modern and responsive interface
• Extensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started
• Includes a variety of pre-built components and layouts for rapid development

Cons of iview-admin

• Less focus on backend integration compared to eladmin
• May require more customization for specific business requirements
• Limited built-in security features compared to eladmin's Spring Security integration

Code Comparison

iview-admin (Vue.js):

<template>
  <div>
    <Table :columns="columns" :data="data"></Table>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  // Component logic
}
</script>

eladmin (Java):

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/users")
public class UserController {
    @GetMapping
    public ResponseEntity<List<User>> getUsers() {
        // Controller logic
    }
}

The code snippets highlight the different approaches: iview-admin focuses on frontend components, while eladmin emphasizes backend API development.

Pros of mall-admin-web

• More comprehensive e-commerce functionality, including order management and product catalog
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Detailed documentation and deployment guides

Cons of mall-admin-web

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects or simpler admin needs
• Less flexible for non-e-commerce applications

Code Comparison

mall-admin-web (Vue.js component):

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <el-card class="filter-container" shadow="never">
      <div>
        <i class="el-icon-search"></i>
        <span>Filter Search</span>
        <el-button style="float: right" type="primary" @click="handleSearchList()">
          Search
        </el-button>
      </div>
      <!-- ... more filter options ... -->
    </el-card>
  </div>
</template>

eladmin (Vue.js component):

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <eForm ref="form" :is-add="isAdd" @close="close" @success="getList" />
    <crud
      ref="crud"
      :permission="permission"
      :table="table"
      :crud-method="crudMethod"
      @toQuery="toQuery"
    />
  </div>
</template>

Both projects use Vue.js for the frontend, but mall-admin-web appears to use more native Element UI components, while eladmin utilizes custom CRUD components for a more abstracted approach to data management.