Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem
• Extensive internationalization support

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to complexity
• Potentially heavier and slower performance
• Less frequent updates compared to vue-admin-better

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import { mapGetters } from 'vuex'

export default {
  computed: {
    ...mapGetters([
      'sidebar',
      'device',
      'visitedViews',
      'cachedViews'
    ])
  }
}

vue-admin-better:

import { useStore } from 'vuex'
import { computed } from 'vue'

export default {
  setup() {
    const store = useStore()
    const sidebar = computed(() => store.state.app.sidebar)
    return { sidebar }
  }
}

The code comparison shows that vue-element-admin uses the older Vuex mapGetters approach, while vue-admin-better utilizes the newer Composition API with the useStore hook. This demonstrates that vue-admin-better may be more up-to-date with recent Vue.js practices.

Both projects offer robust admin template solutions for Vue.js applications, with vue-element-admin providing a more established and feature-rich option, while vue-admin-better focuses on simplicity and modern Vue.js patterns.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• Improved user interface and design
• Enhanced performance optimizations
• More comprehensive documentation

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Potentially higher learning curve for new users
• May require additional setup or configuration

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <el-form :model="queryForm" :inline="true">
      <!-- Advanced form elements -->
    </el-form>
  </div>
</template>

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <div class="app-wrapper">
    <el-form :model="searchForm" inline>
      <!-- Basic form elements -->
    </el-form>
  </div>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses a more structured approach with the app-container class and potentially more advanced form elements. The original vue-admin-better uses a simpler structure with the app-wrapper class and basic form elements.

Both repositories appear to be variations of the same project, with vue-admin-better likely being an improved or updated version. The differences mainly lie in the user interface, performance optimizations, and documentation quality. However, these improvements may come at the cost of a steeper learning curve and potentially more complex setup process.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to understand and customize
• More frequent updates and active maintenance
• Includes a variety of pre-built components and layouts

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive documentation compared to vue-admin-better
• Fewer advanced features and integrations out of the box
• Smaller community and ecosystem

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

<template>
    <div class="header">
        <div class="logo">Vue Manage System</div>
        <div class="user-info">
            <el-dropdown trigger="click" @command="handleCommand">
                <span class="el-dropdown-link">

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <div class="vab-layout-header">
    <vab-logo />
    <vab-nav />
    <div class="vab-layout-header-right">
      <vab-avatar />

The code comparison shows that vue-manage-system uses a more straightforward approach with standard element-ui components, while vue-admin-better employs custom components for better modularity and reusability.

Pros of vue2-manage

• Simpler and more lightweight structure, making it easier for beginners to understand and customize
• Includes a variety of common components and features out-of-the-box, such as charts and tables
• Well-documented with clear explanations of project structure and usage

Cons of vue2-manage

• Based on Vue 2, which is older and lacks some modern features compared to Vue 3
• Less comprehensive in terms of advanced features and customization options
• May require more manual configuration for complex enterprise-level applications

Code Comparison

vue2-manage:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store/'

Vue.config.productionTip = false

new Vue({
  el: '#app',
  router,
  store,
  template: '<App/>',
  components: { App }
})

vue-admin-better:

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'
import { setupPlugins } from '@/plugins'

const app = createApp(App)
setupPlugins(app)
app.use(store).use(router).mount('#app')

The code comparison shows the difference in initialization between Vue 2 and Vue 3, with vue-admin-better using the more modern composition API approach.

Pros of iview-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and better long-term support
• Integrated with iView UI components for consistent design

Cons of iview-admin

• Less frequent updates compared to vue-admin-better
• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive features
• Potentially heavier and slower performance in some cases

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <el-table :data="tableData" style="width: 100%">
      <!-- Table columns -->
    </el-table>
  </div>
</template>

iview-admin:

<template>
  <div>
    <Table :columns="columns" :data="data"></Table>
  </div>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses Element UI components, while iview-admin uses iView components. This reflects the different UI libraries each project is built upon, which can affect the overall look and feel of the admin interface.

Both projects offer robust solutions for building admin interfaces with Vue.js, but they cater to different preferences in terms of UI components and feature sets. The choice between them would depend on specific project requirements, familiarity with the respective UI libraries, and desired level of customization.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More active development with frequent updates and contributions
• Comprehensive documentation and examples for easier implementation
• Built-in support for internationalization (i18n) out of the box

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier bundle size due to numerous built-in components

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { BasicForm, useForm } from '/@/components/Form';
import { formSchema } from './data';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    const [registerForm] = useForm({
      schemas: formSchema,
    });
    // ... rest of the component logic
  },
});

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <el-form ref="form" :model="form" label-width="80px">
    <el-form-item label="Activity name">
      <el-input v-model="form.name"></el-input>
    </el-form-item>
    <!-- ... more form items -->
  </el-form>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      form: {
        name: '',
        // ... other form fields
      },
    };
  },
};
</script>

The code comparison shows that vue-vben-admin uses a more modular approach with composition API and custom hooks, while vue-admin-better follows a more traditional Vue 2 style with template-based forms. vue-vben-admin's approach may offer better scalability and reusability for complex forms.