Pros of vue-element-admin

• More mature and widely adopted, with a larger community and ecosystem
• Extensive documentation and examples available in multiple languages
• Includes a rich set of pre-built components and features out of the box

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Based on Vue 2, which may be considered outdated for new projects
• Heavier and potentially slower due to its comprehensive nature
• Less flexible for customization compared to more modern alternatives

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Element from 'element-ui'
import 'element-ui/lib/theme-chalk/index.css'

Vue.use(Element, { size: 'small', zIndex: 3000 })

vue-vben-admin:

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import { setupElementPlus } from '/@/plugins/elementPlus'

const app = createApp(App)
setupElementPlus(app)

The code snippets show the difference in setup between Vue 2 (vue-element-admin) and Vue 3 (vue-vben-admin) for integrating UI components. vue-vben-admin uses the newer composition API and modular setup approach, while vue-element-admin follows the older Vue 2 plugin system.

vue-vben-admin is built on Vue 3 and TypeScript, offering improved performance and better type safety. It also provides a more modular architecture, making it easier to customize and maintain. However, it may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Vue 3 and TypeScript.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• Simpler and more lightweight structure, potentially easier for beginners to understand and customize
• Includes a wider variety of pre-built components and layouts out-of-the-box
• Offers more extensive documentation and examples for quick start and implementation

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Less frequent updates and maintenance compared to vue-vben-admin
• May lack some advanced features and optimizations present in vue-vben-admin
• Smaller community and ecosystem, potentially leading to fewer third-party plugins and extensions

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <el-container class="layout-container-demo">
    <el-aside width="200px">
      <!-- Sidebar content -->
    </el-aside>
    <el-container>
      <el-header>
        <!-- Header content -->
      </el-header>
      <el-main>
        <!-- Main content -->
      </el-main>
    </el-container>
  </el-container>
</template>

vue-vben-admin:

<template>
  <Layout>
    <LayoutHeader />
    <Layout hasSider>
      <LayoutSider />
      <LayoutContent>
        <!-- Main content -->
      </LayoutContent>
    </Layout>
  </Layout>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses Element UI components for layout structure, while vue-vben-admin employs custom layout components. This difference reflects the overall approach of each project, with vue-admin-better focusing on simplicity and familiarity, and vue-vben-admin offering more customized and potentially optimized solutions.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to understand and customize
• Includes a variety of pre-built components and pages for common admin tasks
• Supports both Vue 2 and Vue 3, offering flexibility for different project requirements

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive documentation compared to vue-vben-admin
• Fewer advanced features and integrations out of the box
• Smaller community and less frequent updates

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

<template>
  <div class="sidebar">
    <el-menu class="sidebar-el-menu" :default-active="onRoutes" :collapse="collapse" background-color="#324157"
      text-color="#bfcbd9" active-text-color="#20a0ff" unique-opened router>
      <template v-for="item in items">
        <template v-if="item.subs">
          <el-submenu :index="item.index" :key="item.index">
            <template #title>
              <i :class="item.icon"></i><span>{{ item.title }}</span>
            </template>
            <template v-for="subItem in item.subs">
              <el-submenu v-if="subItem.subs" :index="subItem.index" :key="subItem.index">
                <template #title>{{ subItem.title }}</template>
                <el-menu-item v-for="(threeItem, i) in subItem.subs" :key="i" :index="threeItem.index">
                  {{ threeItem.title }}
                </el-menu-item>
              </el-submenu>
              <el-menu-item v-else :index="subItem.index" :key="subItem.index">{{ subItem.title }}</el-menu-item>
            </template>
          </el-submenu>
        </template>
        <template v-else>
          <el-menu-item :index="item.index" :key="item.index">
            <i :class="item.icon"></i><span>{{ item.title }}</span>
          </el-menu-item>
        </template>
      </template>
    </el-menu>
  </div>
</template>

vue-vben-admin:

<template>
  <Layout :class="prefixCls" v-bind="lockEvents">
    <LayoutFeatures />
    <LayoutHeader fixed v-if="getShowFullHeaderRef" />
    <Layout :class="[layoutClass]">
      <LayoutSideBar v-if="getShowSidebar || getIsMobile" />
      <Layout :class="`${prefixCls}-main`">
        <LayoutMultipleHeader />
        <LayoutContent />
        <LayoutFooter />
      </Layout>
    </Layout>
  </Layout>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-manage-system uses a more traditional approach with nested templates, while vue-vben-admin employs a more modular structure with custom components.

Pros of naive-ui-admin

• Utilizes the lightweight and performant Naive UI component library
• Simpler setup and configuration process
• More recent and actively maintained project

Cons of naive-ui-admin

• Less comprehensive documentation compared to vue-vben-admin
• Fewer built-in components and features
• Smaller community and ecosystem

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

<template>
  <BasicTable @register="registerTable">
    <template #toolbar>
      <a-button type="primary" @click="handleCreate">Create</a-button>
    </template>
  </BasicTable>
</template>

naive-ui-admin:

<template>
  <n-data-table
    :columns="columns"
    :data="data"
    :pagination="pagination"
    @update:page="handlePageChange"
  />
</template>

Both projects use Vue 3 and TypeScript, but vue-vben-admin employs a more abstracted approach with custom components like BasicTable, while naive-ui-admin uses Naive UI's native components directly. vue-vben-admin offers more out-of-the-box functionality and customization options, whereas naive-ui-admin provides a simpler, more straightforward implementation. The choice between the two depends on project requirements, team expertise, and desired level of customization.

Pros of soybean-admin

• Lighter weight and more streamlined codebase
• Faster initial load times and better performance
• More modern UI design with a cleaner aesthetic

Cons of soybean-admin

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to vue-vben-admin
• Smaller community and fewer available resources/plugins
• Less extensive documentation and examples

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

<template>
  <BasicTable @register="registerTable">
    <template #toolbar>
      <a-button type="primary" @click="handleCreate">新增用户</a-button>
    </template>
  </BasicTable>
</template>

soybean-admin:

<template>
  <n-data-table
    :columns="columns"
    :data="data"
    :pagination="pagination"
    @update:page="handlePageChange"
  />
</template>

The code snippets show that vue-vben-admin uses a custom BasicTable component with more built-in features, while soybean-admin opts for a simpler approach using Naive UI's n-data-table component directly. This reflects the overall difference in complexity and feature richness between the two projects.

Pros of Vuestic Admin

• More visually appealing and modern UI design
• Extensive collection of pre-built UI components
• Better documentation and examples for quick start

Cons of Vuestic Admin

• Less comprehensive in terms of advanced features and integrations
• Smaller community and fewer third-party plugins/extensions
• Limited TypeScript support compared to Vue Vben Admin

Code Comparison

Vue Vben Admin:

<template>
  <BasicTable @register="registerTable">
    <template #bodyCell="{ column, record }">
      <template v-if="column.key === 'action'">
        <TableAction
          :actions="[
            {
              icon: 'clarity:note-edit-line',
              onClick: handleEdit.bind(null, record),
            },
          ]"
        />
      </template>
    </template>
  </BasicTable>
</template>

Vuestic Admin:

<template>
  <va-data-table
    :items="users"
    :columns="columns"
    :selectable="true"
    @selected="onSelected"
  >
    <template #cell(status)="{ rowData }">
      <va-badge :color="getStatusColor(rowData.status)">
        {{ rowData.status }}
      </va-badge>
    </template>
  </va-data-table>
</template>

Both examples showcase table components, but Vue Vben Admin's approach is more flexible with custom cell rendering, while Vuestic Admin offers a more straightforward and concise syntax for common table features.