ruoyi-vue-pro

Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem
• Flexible and customizable for various project types

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less opinionated structure, requiring more decision-making
• May require more setup time for complex projects

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/redirect',
    component: Layout,
    hidden: true,
    children: [
      {
        path: '/redirect/:path(.*)',
        component: () => import('@/views/redirect/index')
      }
    ]
  }
]

ruoyi-vue-pro:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'
import { constantRoutes } from '@/router/routers'

Vue.use(Router)

export default new Router({
  mode: 'history',
  scrollBehavior: () => ({ y: 0 }),
  routes: constantRoutes
})

Both projects use Vue Router, but ruoyi-vue-pro has a more streamlined approach to route configuration. vue-element-admin offers more flexibility in route definition, while ruoyi-vue-pro provides a simpler structure that may be easier for beginners to understand and maintain.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to learn and customize
• Focuses solely on the frontend, allowing more flexibility in backend choices
• Includes a variety of pre-built components and charts for quick development

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive than ruoyi-vue-pro, lacking built-in backend functionality
• Fewer advanced features and integrations out of the box
• May require more manual configuration for complex enterprise applications

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system (main.js):

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'
import installElementPlus from './plugins/element'

ruoyi-vue-pro (main.js):

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import store from './store'
import router from './router'
import directive from './directive'
import plugins from './plugins'

Both projects use Vue 3 and have similar main.js structures. However, ruoyi-vue-pro includes additional imports for custom directives and plugins, indicating a more feature-rich setup.

vue-manage-system is better suited for developers who prefer a lightweight, frontend-focused solution with more flexibility in backend choices. ruoyi-vue-pro offers a more comprehensive, full-stack approach with built-in backend functionality and advanced features, making it ideal for larger enterprise applications.

Pros of iview-admin

• More comprehensive UI components and layouts
• Better documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem

Cons of iview-admin

• Less focus on backend integration
• May require more customization for specific business needs
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to iView

Code Comparison

iview-admin:

<template>
  <div class="layout">
    <Layout>
      <Sider hide-trigger :style="{background: '#fff'}">
        <Menu active-name="1" theme="light" width="auto" :open-names="['1']">

ruoyi-vue-pro:

<template>
  <div :class="classObj" class="app-wrapper">
    <div v-if="device==='mobile'&&sidebar.opened" class="drawer-bg" @click="handleClickOutside" />
    <sidebar class="sidebar-container" />

Both projects use Vue.js and provide admin templates, but iview-admin focuses more on UI components and layouts, while ruoyi-vue-pro offers a more integrated approach with backend services. iview-admin may be better suited for projects requiring extensive UI customization, while ruoyi-vue-pro might be more appropriate for full-stack applications needing quick setup and backend integration.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better TypeScript support and integration
• Extensive documentation and examples

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• May be overkill for smaller projects
• Less focus on backend integration compared to ruoyi-vue-pro

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { BasicTable, useTable } from '/@/components/Table';
import { getBasicColumns, getFormConfig } from './tableData';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    const [registerTable] = useTable({
      title: 'Basic Usage',
      api: demoListApi,
      columns: getBasicColumns(),
      formConfig: getFormConfig(),
    });
    return { registerTable };
  },
});

ruoyi-vue-pro:

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <el-form :model="queryParams" ref="queryForm" :inline="true" v-show="showSearch" label-width="68px">
      <el-form-item label="参数名称" prop="configName">
        <el-input v-model="queryParams.configName" placeholder="请输入参数名称" clearable size="small" @keyup.enter.native="handleQuery" />
      </el-form-item>
    </el-form>
  </div>
</template>

Both projects offer robust admin templates, but vue-vben-admin focuses more on frontend features and TypeScript integration, while ruoyi-vue-pro provides a more comprehensive full-stack solution with backend integration. The code snippets showcase the different approaches to table implementation and form handling in each project.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More lightweight and focused on front-end admin template functionality
• Easier to customize and extend for specific project needs
• Faster initial setup and development time for simple admin interfaces

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Less comprehensive out-of-the-box features compared to ruoyi-vue-pro
• Limited backend integration and scaffolding options
• Smaller community and fewer resources for support and troubleshooting

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <vab-layout>
    <vab-sidebar />
    <vab-main>
      <router-view />
    </vab-main>
  </vab-layout>
</template>

ruoyi-vue-pro:

<template>
  <div :class="classObj" class="app-wrapper">
    <sidebar class="sidebar-container" />
    <div class="main-container">
      <navbar />
      <app-main />
    </div>
  </div>
</template>

The code snippets show that vue-admin-better uses custom components for layout, while ruoyi-vue-pro follows a more traditional structure. This reflects the difference in approach, with vue-admin-better focusing on simplicity and customization, while ruoyi-vue-pro provides a more comprehensive and structured framework.

Pros of mall-admin-web

• Focused specifically on e-commerce admin functionality
• More comprehensive product management features
• Includes order management and logistics tracking

Cons of mall-admin-web

• Less extensive general-purpose admin features
• Smaller community and fewer contributors
• Less frequent updates and maintenance

Code Comparison

mall-admin-web (Vue.js component):

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <el-card class="filter-container" shadow="never">
      <div>
        <i class="el-icon-search"></i>
        <span>筛选搜索</span>
        <el-button style="float: right" type="primary" @click="handleSearchList()">查询结果</el-button>
      </div>
    </el-card>
  </div>
</template>

ruoyi-vue-pro (Vue.js component):

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <el-form :model="queryParams" ref="queryForm" size="small" :inline="true" v-show="showSearch" label-width="68px">
      <el-form-item label="登录地址" prop="loginIp">
        <el-input v-model="queryParams.loginIp" placeholder="请输入登录地址" clearable style="width: 240px" @keyup.enter.native="handleQuery" />
      </el-form-item>
    </el-form>
  </div>
</template>

Both projects use Vue.js and Element UI for the frontend, but ruoyi-vue-pro appears to have a more structured approach to form handling and querying. mall-admin-web focuses on e-commerce-specific features, while ruoyi-vue-pro offers a more general-purpose admin framework with extensive customization options.