Pros of LiquidFloatingActionButton

• Offers a unique liquid animation effect for the floating action button
• Provides customizable options for the liquid animation, such as color and elasticity
• Supports both Swift and Objective-C

Cons of LiquidFloatingActionButton

• Limited to floating action buttons only, while Floaty supports various button types
• Less actively maintained, with fewer recent updates compared to Floaty
• Lacks some advanced features present in Floaty, such as drag-to-move functionality

Code Comparison

LiquidFloatingActionButton:

let floatingActionButton = LiquidFloatingActionButton(frame: CGRect(x: self.view.frame.width - 56 - 16, y: self.view.frame.height - 56 - 16, width: 56, height: 56))
floatingActionButton.responsible = true
floatingActionButton.animateStyle = .up
floatingActionButton.cells = [LiquidFloatingCell(icon: UIImage(named: "icon"))]
self.view.addSubview(floatingActionButton)

Floaty:

let floaty = Floaty()
floaty.addItem(title: "Hello, World!")
floaty.paddingX = 16
floaty.paddingY = 16
self.view.addSubview(floaty)

Both libraries offer easy-to-use implementations for floating action buttons in iOS applications. LiquidFloatingActionButton focuses on providing a unique liquid animation effect, while Floaty offers more versatility in terms of button types and advanced features. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your project and the desired visual effects.

Pros of circle-menu

• More visually appealing and interactive circular menu design
• Supports customizable animations and transitions
• Includes additional features like button highlighting and menu item icons

Cons of circle-menu

• Limited to circular menu layout, less flexible than Floaty's customizable positioning
• May require more setup and configuration compared to Floaty's simpler implementation
• Potentially higher performance overhead due to complex animations

Code Comparison

circle-menu:

let circleMenu = CircleMenu(
    frame: view.bounds,
    normalIcon:"icon_menu",
    selectedIcon:"icon_close",
    buttonsCount: 4,
    duration: 4,
    distance: 120)
view.addSubview(circleMenu)

Floaty:

let floaty = Floaty()
floaty.addItem("Item 1", icon: UIImage(named: "icon1"))
floaty.addItem("Item 2", icon: UIImage(named: "icon2"))
view.addSubview(floaty)

Both libraries offer easy-to-use implementations for adding interactive menu elements to iOS applications. circle-menu focuses on a visually striking circular menu design with customizable animations, while Floaty provides more flexibility in button positioning and a simpler setup process. The choice between the two depends on the specific design requirements and desired user interaction for your app.

Pros of folding-cell

• More visually appealing and interactive UI element
• Provides a unique expanding cell animation for table views
• Offers customizable content for both folded and unfolded states

Cons of folding-cell

• Limited to table view cells, less versatile than Floaty
• May require more setup and configuration for each cell
• Potentially higher performance impact due to complex animations

Code Comparison

folding-cell:

let cell = FoldingCell()
cell.backgroundColor = .clear
cell.foregroundView = foregroundView
cell.containerView = containerView
cell.foregroundColor = .white
cell.containerColor = .clear

Floaty:

let floaty = Floaty()
floaty.addItem("Item 1", icon: UIImage(named: "icon1"))
floaty.addItem("Item 2", icon: UIImage(named: "icon2"))
floaty.paddingX = 16
floaty.paddingY = 16
self.view.addSubview(floaty)

Summary

While folding-cell offers a unique and visually appealing expanding cell animation for table views, Floaty provides a more versatile floating action button that can be used in various contexts. folding-cell may require more setup for each cell but offers customizable content for both folded and unfolded states. Floaty, on the other hand, is simpler to implement and can be easily added to any view with multiple action items.

Pros of expanding-collection

• More visually appealing and interactive UI component
• Supports custom card layouts and content
• Provides smooth animations and transitions

Cons of expanding-collection

• More complex implementation and setup
• Limited to collection view-based interfaces
• Potentially higher performance overhead for large datasets

Code Comparison

expanding-collection:

let expandingCollection = ExpandingCollection(collectionViewLayout: layout)
expandingCollection.dataSource = self
expandingCollection.delegate = self
view.addSubview(expandingCollection)

Floaty:

let floaty = Floaty()
floaty.addItem("Item 1", icon: UIImage(named: "icon1"))
floaty.addItem("Item 2", icon: UIImage(named: "icon2"))
view.addSubview(floaty)

Summary

expanding-collection offers a more visually rich and interactive UI component compared to Floaty's simpler floating action button. While expanding-collection provides greater customization and animation options, it comes with increased complexity and potential performance considerations. Floaty, on the other hand, is easier to implement and more versatile for various app layouts but lacks the advanced visual features of expanding-collection.

The code comparison shows that expanding-collection requires more setup and integration with collection view data sources and delegates, while Floaty can be quickly added to a view with minimal configuration.

Pros of paper-onboarding

• More visually appealing and customizable onboarding experience
• Smooth animations and transitions between onboarding steps
• Better suited for complex, multi-step onboarding processes

Cons of paper-onboarding

• Limited to onboarding scenarios, less versatile than Floaty
• Potentially steeper learning curve for implementation
• May require more setup and configuration

Code Comparison

paper-onboarding:

let onboarding = PaperOnboarding()
onboarding.dataSource = self
onboarding.delegate = self
view.addSubview(onboarding)

Floaty:

let floaty = Floaty()
floaty.addItem("Item 1", icon: UIImage(named: "icon"))
floaty.addItem("Item 2", icon: UIImage(named: "icon"))
view.addSubview(floaty)

paper-onboarding focuses on creating a structured onboarding flow with multiple pages, while Floaty provides a simple floating action button with customizable items. paper-onboarding requires implementing data source and delegate methods, whereas Floaty allows for quick addition of items with minimal setup. The choice between the two depends on the specific use case and desired user experience.

Pros of animated-tab-bar

• More visually appealing with animated icons and transitions
• Offers a variety of pre-designed tab bar styles
• Supports both Swift and Objective-C

Cons of animated-tab-bar

• Limited to tab bar functionality
• May require more setup and customization for specific use cases
• Potentially higher performance overhead due to animations

Code Comparison

animated-tab-bar:

let tabBarController = RAMAnimatedTabBarController()
let item1 = RAMAnimatedTabBarItem(title: "Home", image: UIImage(named: "home"), tag: 1)
item1.animation = RAMBounceAnimation()
tabBarController.viewControllers = [vc1, vc2, vc3]
tabBarController.setViewControllers([vc1, vc2, vc3], animated: true)

Floaty:

let floaty = Floaty()
floaty.addItem("Item 1", icon: UIImage(named: "icon1"))
floaty.addItem("Item 2", icon: UIImage(named: "icon2"))
view.addSubview(floaty)

Summary

animated-tab-bar focuses on creating visually appealing tab bars with animations, while Floaty provides a floating action button with expandable menu items. animated-tab-bar offers more customization options for tab bars but is limited to that specific UI element. Floaty, on the other hand, is more versatile and can be used in various contexts where a floating action button is needed. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your app's user interface and functionality.