Pros of simplefolio

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier for beginners to customize
• Includes a dark mode feature out of the box
• Provides a smoother scrolling experience with built-in animations

Cons of simplefolio

• Less comprehensive and feature-rich compared to personal-site
• Limited to a single-page design, which may not suit complex portfolios
• Fewer sections and content types available by default

Code Comparison

personal-site uses React and includes more complex components:

const Main = () => (
  <BrowserRouter basename={BASE_PATH}>
    <Switch>
      <Route exact path="/" component={Index} />
      <Route path="/about" component={About} />
      <Route path="/projects" component={Projects} />
      <Route path="/stats" component={Stats} />
      <Route path="/contact" component={Contact} />
      <Route component={NotFound} status={404} />
    </Switch>
  </BrowserRouter>
);

simplefolio uses vanilla JavaScript and HTML for a simpler structure:

<section id="about">
  <div class="container">
    <h2 class="section-title">About me</h2>
    <div class="row about-wrapper">
      <div class="col-md-6 col-sm-12">
        <div class="about-wrapper__image">
          <img class="img-fluid rounded shadow-lg" height="auto" width="300px" src="./assets/profile.jpg" alt="Profile Image" />
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="col-md-6 col-sm-12">
        <div class="about-wrapper__info">
          <p class="about-wrapper__info-text">...</p>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</section>

Pros of v4

• More modern and visually appealing design
• Better mobile responsiveness and overall user experience
• Extensive use of animations and transitions for a polished look

Cons of v4

• Less customizable without deep code changes
• Potentially slower load times due to heavier use of JavaScript and animations
• May require more maintenance to keep dependencies up-to-date

Code Comparison

v4 uses styled-components for CSS-in-JS:

const StyledHeader = styled.header`
  display: flex;
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  position: fixed;
  top: 0;
  z-index: 11;
  padding: 0px 50px;
  width: 100%;
  height: var(--nav-height);
  background-color: var(--navy);
  transition: var(--transition);
  filter: none !important;
  pointer-events: auto !important;
  user-select: auto !important;
`;

personal-site uses traditional CSS modules:

.header {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: space-between;
  align-items: center;
  position: fixed;
  top: 0;
  left: 0;
  width: 100%;
  z-index: 10;
  padding: 0 20px;
  background-color: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1);
}

Both approaches have their merits, with v4's method offering more dynamic styling capabilities, while personal-site's approach may be simpler and more familiar to some developers.

Pros of personal-website

• Simpler setup and configuration, ideal for beginners
• Built-in GitHub Pages integration for easy deployment
• Includes a blog feature out of the box

Cons of personal-website

• Less customizable and flexible compared to personal-site
• Fewer pre-built sections and components
• Limited styling options without extensive modifications

Code Comparison

personal-website:

<main id="content" class="main-content" role="main">
  {{ content }}
  {% include footer.html %}
</main>

personal-site:

const Main = () => (
  <main className="container">
    <Helmet titleTemplate="%s | Michael D'Angelo" defaultTitle="Michael D'Angelo" />
    <div className="main-container">
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<Index />} />
        {/* Other routes */}
      </Routes>
    </div>
  </main>
);

personal-website uses a simpler Jekyll-based structure with HTML templates, while personal-site employs a more complex React-based architecture with JSX components. The personal-site approach offers greater flexibility and dynamic content capabilities, but requires more advanced development skills.

Pros of github-readme-stats

• Lightweight and focused on generating GitHub stats for README files
• Easy to implement with a single line of markdown
• Customizable themes and layout options

Cons of github-readme-stats

• Limited to GitHub statistics and doesn't provide a full personal website solution
• Requires external hosting for the generated images
• Less control over the overall design and content structure

Code Comparison

github-readme-stats:

[![Anurag's GitHub stats](https://github-readme-stats.vercel.app/api?username=anuraghazra)](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)

personal-site:

import React from 'react';
import { Link } from 'react-router-dom';
import Main from '../layouts/Main';

const Index = () => (
  <Main>
    <article className="post" id="index">
      <header>
        <div className="title">
          <h2><Link to="/">About this site</Link></h2>
          <p>A beautiful, responsive, react app written with modern Javascript.</p>
        </div>
      </header>
      {/* ... */}
    </article>
  </Main>
);

export default Index;

The code comparison shows that github-readme-stats is implemented with a single line of markdown, while personal-site requires more complex React components and routing for a full website structure.

Pros of home

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to customize and maintain
• Uses React Hooks for state management, providing a more modern approach
• Includes a dark mode feature out of the box

Cons of home

• Less comprehensive and feature-rich compared to personal-site
• Limited built-in sections, requiring more custom development for additional content
• Lacks integrated blog functionality

Code Comparison

personal-site uses a more structured approach with separate components:

<Layout>
  <Helmet titleTemplate="%s | Michael D'Angelo" defaultTitle="Michael D'Angelo" />
  <Header />
  <Main />
</Layout>

home uses a single-page structure with conditional rendering:

<>
  <Navigation />
  {home && <Home />}
  {about && <About />}
  {projects && <Projects />}
</>

Both projects use React, but personal-site incorporates more advanced features and a more complex structure, while home offers a simpler, more customizable starting point for a personal website.