Pros of Material Dashboard Angular2

• Utilizes Material Design, offering a modern and sleek UI out of the box
• Includes more pre-built components and pages, reducing development time
• Better documentation and support from Creative Tim

Cons of Material Dashboard Angular2

• Less customizable compared to SB Admin BS4 Angular 8
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Material Design
• Larger bundle size due to additional Material Design dependencies

Code Comparison

Material Dashboard Angular2:

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';
import * as Chartist from 'chartist';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-dashboard',
  templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html'
})
export class DashboardComponent implements OnInit {
  // Component logic
}

SB Admin BS4 Angular 8:

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';
import { routerTransition } from '../../router.animations';

@Component({
    selector: 'app-dashboard',
    templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./dashboard.component.scss'],
    animations: [routerTransition()]
})
export class DashboardComponent implements OnInit {
    // Component logic
}

The main differences in the code snippets are:

1. Material Dashboard uses Chartist for charts, while SB Admin uses custom animations.
2. SB Admin includes additional styling and animation configurations.

Both repositories provide solid foundations for admin dashboards, with Material Dashboard offering a more opinionated design approach and SB Admin providing greater flexibility for customization.

Pros of ngx-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wider range of UI components and layouts
• Better documentation and community support, with regular updates and active maintenance
• Includes multiple color schemes and themes out of the box

Cons of ngx-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive features
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler applications
• May require more customization to remove unnecessary components for basic projects

Code Comparison

SB-Admin-BS4-Angular-8:

import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';
import { routerTransition } from '../../router.animations';

@Component({
    selector: 'app-dashboard',
    templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html',
    styleUrls: ['./dashboard.component.scss'],
    animations: [routerTransition()]
})

ngx-admin:

import { Component } from '@angular/core';

import { MENU_ITEMS } from './pages-menu';

@Component({
  selector: 'ngx-pages',
  styleUrls: ['pages.component.scss'],
  template: `
    <ngx-one-column-layout>
      <nb-menu [items]="menu"></nb-menu>
      <router-outlet></router-outlet>
    </ngx-one-column-layout>
  `,
})

The code comparison shows that ngx-admin uses a more modular approach with separate menu configuration and a one-column layout component, while SB-Admin-BS4-Angular-8 uses a more traditional component structure with animations.

Pros of CoreUI Free Angular Admin Template

• More comprehensive UI components and layouts
• Better documentation and support
• Regular updates and active maintenance

Cons of CoreUI Free Angular Admin Template

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex structure
• Potentially more bloated for simpler projects
• Some advanced features reserved for paid version

Code Comparison

SB Admin BS4 Angular 8:

import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { AppRoutingModule } from './app-routing.module';
import { AppComponent } from './app.component';

CoreUI Free Angular Admin Template:

import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { LocationStrategy, HashLocationStrategy } from '@angular/common';
import { BrowserAnimationsModule } from '@angular/platform-browser/animations';
import { PerfectScrollbarModule } from 'ngx-perfect-scrollbar';

The CoreUI template includes additional imports for enhanced functionality, such as animations and scrollbar customization, while SB Admin keeps it simpler with basic Angular imports.

Both templates provide solid foundations for admin dashboards, but CoreUI offers more features and customization options at the cost of increased complexity. SB Admin is more straightforward and may be better suited for smaller projects or developers new to Angular admin templates.

Pros of rdash-angular

• Lightweight and minimalistic design, focusing on essential dashboard components
• Easy to customize and extend due to its simple structure
• Better performance due to fewer dependencies and lighter codebase

Cons of rdash-angular

• Less feature-rich compared to SB-Admin-BS4-Angular-8
• Older project with less frequent updates
• May require more manual work to implement advanced features

Code Comparison

rdash-angular:

<div id="page-wrapper" ng-class="{'open': toggle}" ng-cloak>
  <div id="sidebar-wrapper">
    <ul class="sidebar">
      <li class="sidebar-main">
        <a ng-click="toggleSidebar()">
          Dashboard
          <span class="menu-icon glyphicon glyphicon-transfer"></span>
        </a>
      </li>
    </ul>
  </div>
</div>

SB-Admin-BS4-Angular-8:

<nav class="sb-topnav navbar navbar-expand navbar-dark bg-dark">
  <a class="navbar-brand" [routerLink]="['/']">Start Bootstrap</a>
  <button class="btn btn-link btn-sm order-1 order-lg-0" id="sidebarToggle" href="#">
    <i class="fas fa-bars"></i>
  </button>
  <!-- Navbar Search-->
  <form class="d-none d-md-inline-block form-inline ml-auto mr-0 mr-md-3 my-2 my-md-0">
    <!-- ... -->
  </form>
</nav>

Both repositories provide Angular-based admin dashboard templates, but they differ in their approach and feature set. rdash-angular offers a more lightweight and customizable solution, while SB-Admin-BS4-Angular-8 provides a more comprehensive and feature-rich template out of the box.