Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem
• Extensive internationalization support

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier bundle size for smaller projects

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Element from 'element-ui'
import 'element-ui/lib/theme-chalk/index.css'

Vue.use(Element, { size: 'small', zIndex: 3000 })

vue-antd-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Antd from 'ant-design-vue'
import 'ant-design-vue/dist/antd.css'

Vue.use(Antd)

The main difference in the code snippets is the UI library being imported and used. vue-element-admin uses Element UI, while vue-antd-admin uses Ant Design Vue. Both frameworks provide a similar setup process, but Element UI allows for more configuration options during initialization.

vue-element-admin offers a more feature-rich and widely adopted solution, making it suitable for large-scale applications. However, this comes at the cost of increased complexity and potential overhead. vue-antd-admin, on the other hand, provides a simpler approach with Ant Design components, which may be more suitable for smaller projects or developers familiar with the Ant Design ecosystem.

Pros of ant-design-vue-pro

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Better integration with Ant Design Vue components
• Regularly updated and maintained by the official Ant Design Vue team

Cons of ant-design-vue-pro

• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less flexibility for customization compared to vue-antd-admin
• Heavier bundle size due to more features and components

Code Comparison

vue-antd-admin:

<template>
  <a-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <a-layout class="admin-layout">
      <router-view/>
    </a-layout>
  </a-config-provider>
</template>

ant-design-vue-pro:

<template>
  <a-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <div id="app">
      <router-view/>
    </div>
  </a-config-provider>
</template>

Both projects use similar structure for their main App component, wrapping the router view with Ant Design's ConfigProvider. However, ant-design-vue-pro uses a simpler div structure, while vue-antd-admin utilizes the a-layout component for better integration with Ant Design's layout system.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Includes built-in internationalization support
• Offers a wider range of pre-built components and layouts

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Potentially steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• May have more overhead for simpler projects
• Less frequent updates compared to vue-antd-admin

Code Comparison

vue-antd-admin:

<template>
  <a-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <a-layout class="admin-layout">
      <router-view/>
    </a-layout>
  </a-config-provider>
</template>

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <el-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <router-view v-if="isRouterAlive" />
  </el-config-provider>
</template>

Both projects use a similar structure for their main layout components, with vue-antd-admin using Ant Design components and vue-admin-better using Element UI. The vue-admin-better example includes a conditional rendering based on a router state, which may provide more flexibility in certain scenarios.

Overall, vue-admin-better offers more features and components out of the box, making it suitable for larger, more complex projects. However, vue-antd-admin may be a better choice for simpler applications or those already familiar with Ant Design.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to understand and customize
• Includes a variety of chart components out of the box
• Supports both Vue 2 and Vue 3 versions

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to vue-antd-admin
• Fewer pre-built components and layouts
• Less frequent updates and maintenance

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

<template>
    <div class="header">
        <!-- Simple header implementation -->
        <div class="logo">Logo</div>
        <div class="user-info">
            <el-dropdown trigger="click">
                <!-- User dropdown menu -->
            </el-dropdown>
        </div>
    </div>
</template>

vue-antd-admin:

<template>
    <a-layout-header class="header-animat" :class="[{'light': theme.layout !== 'side' && theme.header === 'light'}]">
        <div :class="['admin-header', {'dark': theme.layout !== 'side' && theme.header !== 'light'}]">
            <div class="admin-header-wide">
                <router-link v-if="isMobile" to="/" class="logo">
                    <img src="@/assets/img/logo.png" alt="logo">
                </router-link>
                <a-divider v-if="isMobile" type="vertical" />
                <!-- More complex header implementation -->
            </div>
        </div>
    </a-layout-header>
</template>

This comparison shows that vue-antd-admin has a more complex and feature-rich header implementation, while vue-manage-system opts for a simpler approach.

Pros of naive-ui-admin

• Uses Naive UI, a Vue 3 component library with a modern design and extensive customization options
• Built with Vite, offering faster development and build times compared to webpack
• Implements TypeScript for improved type safety and developer experience

Cons of naive-ui-admin

• Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Ant Design
• Less comprehensive documentation and examples than vue-antd-admin
• May have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Naive UI

Code Comparison

vue-antd-admin:

<template>
  <a-form :form="form" @submit="handleSubmit">
    <a-form-item label="Username">
      <a-input v-decorator="['username', { rules: [{ required: true }] }]" />
    </a-form-item>
    <a-form-item>
      <a-button type="primary" html-type="submit">Submit</a-button>
    </a-form-item>
  </a-form>
</template>

naive-ui-admin:

<template>
  <n-form :model="formValue" :rules="rules" @submit="handleSubmit">
    <n-form-item label="Username" path="username">
      <n-input v-model:value="formValue.username" />
    </n-form-item>
    <n-form-item>
      <n-button type="primary" attr-type="submit">Submit</n-button>
    </n-form-item>
  </n-form>
</template>

Both examples show similar form structures, but naive-ui-admin uses Naive UI components and Vue 3's composition API, while vue-antd-admin uses Ant Design components and Vue 2 syntax.