Pros of github-readme-stats

• More customizable with themes, icons, and layout options
• Provides dynamic cards for languages, stats, and top repositories
• Easier to integrate with just a single line of markdown

Cons of github-readme-stats

• Relies on external hosting, which may have uptime or performance issues
• Limited to predefined card types and metrics

Code Comparison

github-readme-stats:

[![Anurag's GitHub stats](https://github-readme-stats.vercel.app/api?username=anuraghazra)](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)

github-stats:

import github_stats
user = github_stats.GitHubUser("jstrieb")
print(user.to_str())

github-readme-stats offers a simpler integration with a single line of markdown, while github-stats requires Python code to generate statistics.

github-readme-stats focuses on visual representation with customizable cards, whereas github-stats provides more raw data and flexibility for custom processing.

github-stats allows for local generation and hosting of statistics, which can be beneficial for privacy and control, while github-readme-stats relies on external services.

Both projects aim to display GitHub statistics, but they cater to different use cases and levels of customization. The choice between them depends on the specific needs of the user, such as ease of integration, visual appeal, or data control.

Pros of metrics

• More comprehensive and customizable, offering a wider range of metrics and visualizations
• Supports multiple CI/CD platforms and can be integrated into various workflows
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and a larger community

Cons of metrics

• More complex setup and configuration process
• Requires more resources to run due to its extensive features
• Steeper learning curve for users new to GitHub metrics

Code comparison

metrics:

- uses: lowlighter/metrics@latest
  with:
    token: ${{ secrets.METRICS_TOKEN }}
    config_timezone: Europe/Paris
    plugin_languages: yes
    plugin_languages_ignored: html, css

github-stats:

- uses: jstrieb/github-stats@v1
  with:
    GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    EXCLUDED_LANGS: html,css
    EXCLUDED_REPOS: jstrieb/github-stats

Both repositories provide GitHub statistics and visualizations, but metrics offers a more feature-rich and flexible solution at the cost of increased complexity. github-stats is simpler and easier to set up but has fewer customization options. The code comparison shows that metrics requires more configuration parameters, reflecting its broader range of features.

Pros of github-profile-trophy

• Visually appealing trophies for GitHub profile achievements
• Easy to customize and integrate into GitHub README
• Provides a gamification aspect to GitHub contributions

Cons of github-profile-trophy

• Limited to predefined trophy types and achievements
• May not provide as detailed statistics as github-stats
• Requires manual updates to keep trophies current

Code Comparison

github-profile-trophy:

[![trophy](https://github-profile-trophy.vercel.app/?username=ryo-ma)](https://github.com/ryo-ma/github-profile-trophy)

github-stats:

<a href="https://github.com/jstrieb/github-stats">
<img src="https://github.com/jstrieb/github-stats/blob/master/generated/overview.svg#gh-dark-mode-only" />
<img src="https://github.com/jstrieb/github-stats/blob/master/generated/languages.svg#gh-dark-mode-only" />
</a>

Summary

github-profile-trophy offers an eye-catching, gamified approach to showcasing GitHub achievements, making it ideal for users who want to add a fun element to their profile. It's easy to implement but limited in customization and detail.

github-stats, on the other hand, provides more comprehensive statistics and language breakdowns, making it better suited for users who want to display detailed information about their GitHub activity and coding preferences.

Both projects serve different purposes and can be used together to create a more comprehensive GitHub profile.

Pros of github-readme-streak-stats

• Focuses specifically on GitHub contribution streaks, providing a visually appealing way to showcase consistency
• Offers extensive customization options for colors, themes, and layout
• Regularly updated with new features and improvements

Cons of github-readme-streak-stats

• Limited to streak statistics, lacking broader GitHub activity metrics
• Requires a separate service to generate and host the streak images

Code Comparison

github-readme-streak-stats:

def get_streak_count(contributions):
    streak = 0
    for day in contributions:
        if day.count > 0:
            streak += 1
        else:
            break
    return streak

github-stats:

def get_total_contributions(contributions):
    return sum(day.count for day in contributions)

The code snippets highlight the different focus areas of each project. github-readme-streak-stats calculates consecutive contribution days, while github-stats provides a broader overview of total contributions.

Both projects offer valuable insights into GitHub activity, with github-readme-streak-stats excelling in visualizing contribution streaks and github-stats providing a more comprehensive set of statistics. The choice between them depends on the specific metrics a user wants to highlight in their GitHub profile.

Pros of github-profile-summary-cards

• Offers a wider variety of visual cards and statistics
• Provides language-specific contribution graphs
• Easier to customize and configure through a YAML file

Cons of github-profile-summary-cards

• Requires more setup and configuration
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
• Limited to predefined card types and layouts

Code Comparison

github-profile-summary-cards:

name: GitHub-Profile-Summary-Cards
on:
  schedule:
    - cron: "0 0 * * *"
  workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - uses: vn7n24fzkq/github-profile-summary-cards@release
        env:
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

github-stats:

name: Generate Stats Images
on:
  schedule:
    - cron: "0 0 * * 0"
  workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - uses: jstrieb/github-stats@v1
        with:
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

Both projects use GitHub Actions to generate statistics, but github-profile-summary-cards offers more customization options through its YAML configuration. github-stats has a simpler setup but provides fewer visual options. The choice between the two depends on the user's preference for customization versus simplicity.

Pros of github-profile-views-counter

• Simple setup with minimal configuration required
• Provides a real-time count of profile views
• Easily customizable badge design

Cons of github-profile-views-counter

• Limited to tracking profile views only
• Doesn't provide detailed statistics or visualizations
• May require external hosting for optimal performance

Code Comparison

github-profile-views-counter:

![](https://komarev.com/ghpvc/?username=your-github-username)

github-stats:

name: GitHub Stats
uses: jstrieb/github-stats@v1.0.0
with:
  USERNAME: ${{ github.repository_owner }}
  TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

github-profile-views-counter focuses on providing a simple, easy-to-implement view counter for GitHub profiles. It offers a straightforward solution for users who want to display their profile view count without additional complexity.

On the other hand, github-stats provides a more comprehensive set of statistics and visualizations for GitHub profiles and repositories. It generates detailed graphs and charts, offering a broader overview of a user's GitHub activity and contributions.

While github-profile-views-counter excels in simplicity and ease of use, github-stats offers more in-depth analytics and visual representations of GitHub data. The choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs and desired level of detail in their GitHub profile statistics.