Pros of github-readme-stats

• Simpler setup and integration, requiring minimal configuration
• Lightweight and focused specifically on GitHub stats
• Faster rendering of stats due to its specialized nature

Cons of github-readme-stats

• Limited customization options compared to metrics
• Fewer types of data and visualizations available
• Less frequent updates and smaller contributor base

Code Comparison

metrics:

- uses: lowlighter/metrics@latest
  with:
    token: ${{ secrets.METRICS_TOKEN }}
    config_timezone: America/New_York
    plugin_languages: yes
    plugin_languages_ignored: html, css

github-readme-stats:

[![Anurag's GitHub stats](https://github-readme-stats.vercel.app/api?username=anuraghazra&show_icons=true&theme=radical)](https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats)

metrics offers more extensive configuration options and plugins, allowing for greater customization of the displayed data. github-readme-stats provides a simpler, more straightforward implementation with fewer options but easier setup.

Both projects serve the purpose of displaying GitHub statistics, but metrics offers a more comprehensive solution with additional features and data types. github-readme-stats is better suited for users looking for a quick and easy way to showcase basic GitHub stats, while metrics is ideal for those seeking more detailed and customizable visualizations.

Pros of waka-readme

• Focused specifically on WakaTime integration for coding stats
• Simpler setup and configuration process
• Lightweight and less resource-intensive

Cons of waka-readme

• Limited to WakaTime data only, less versatile
• Fewer customization options and visual elements
• Less frequent updates and smaller community

Code Comparison

waka-readme:

name: Waka Readme

on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 0 * * *'

jobs:
  update-readme:
    name: Update Readme with Metrics
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: athul/waka-readme@master
        with:
          WAKATIME_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.WAKATIME_API_KEY }}

metrics:

name: Metrics

on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 0 * * *'

jobs:
  github-metrics:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: lowlighter/metrics@latest
        with:
          token: ${{ secrets.METRICS_TOKEN }}
          config_timezone: America/New_York
          plugin_languages: yes
          plugin_habits: yes
          plugin_isocalendar: yes

The code comparison shows that metrics offers more plugins and configuration options out of the box, while waka-readme focuses solely on WakaTime integration. metrics provides a wider range of data visualization possibilities, making it more suitable for users who want comprehensive GitHub profile statistics beyond just coding time.

Pros of github-readme-streak-stats

• Focused specifically on GitHub contribution streaks, providing a clean and dedicated visualization
• Offers extensive customization options for colors, date formats, and layout
• Lightweight and fast-loading, ideal for embedding in GitHub profiles

Cons of github-readme-streak-stats

• Limited to streak statistics only, lacking the comprehensive GitHub metrics offered by metrics
• Requires manual setup and configuration, whereas metrics provides more automated options
• Less frequent updates compared to the actively maintained metrics project

Code Comparison

github-readme-streak-stats:

streak = calculate_streak(username)
svg = generate_svg(streak, theme)
return svg

metrics:

data = fetch_github_data(username)
metrics = calculate_metrics(data)
svg = generate_svg(metrics, layout)
return svg

The code snippets illustrate the simplified workflow of each project. github-readme-streak-stats focuses solely on streak calculation and visualization, while metrics handles a broader range of GitHub data and metrics.

Both projects serve different purposes: github-readme-streak-stats excels at providing a dedicated streak visualization, while metrics offers a more comprehensive GitHub profile analysis. The choice between them depends on whether you need a focused streak display or a wider range of GitHub statistics.

Pros of github-profile-trophy

• Focused specifically on showcasing GitHub achievements as trophies
• Simple setup with minimal configuration required
• Visually appealing and gamified display of accomplishments

Cons of github-profile-trophy

• Limited customization options compared to metrics
• Fewer data points and metrics available
• Less frequent updates and maintenance

Code Comparison

github-profile-trophy:

[![trophy](https://github-profile-trophy.vercel.app/?username=ryo-ma)](https://github.com/ryo-ma/github-profile-trophy)

metrics:

- uses: lowlighter/metrics@latest
  with:
    token: ${{ secrets.METRICS_TOKEN }}
    config_timezone: America/New_York
    template: classic
    base: header, activity, community, repositories, metadata

Summary

github-profile-trophy offers a straightforward, visually appealing way to display GitHub achievements as trophies. It's easy to set up and provides a gamified experience for showcasing accomplishments. However, it has limited customization options and fewer data points compared to metrics.

metrics, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive and customizable solution for displaying GitHub statistics and activities. It offers a wide range of metrics, plugins, and configuration options, allowing users to create highly detailed and personalized GitHub profile readmes. While it requires more setup and configuration, metrics provides a more in-depth analysis of a user's GitHub activity.

Pros of github-profile-views-counter

• Simple and focused: Specifically counts profile views
• Lightweight: Minimal resource usage and easy to implement
• Real-time updates: View count updates quickly

Cons of github-profile-views-counter

• Limited functionality: Only provides view count, no other metrics
• Less customizable: Fewer options for display and data presentation
• No data visualization: Lacks graphs or charts for view trends

Code Comparison

github-profile-views-counter:

![](https://komarev.com/ghpvc/?username=your-github-username)

metrics:

- uses: lowlighter/metrics@latest
  with:
    username: your-github-username
    token: ${{ secrets.METRICS_TOKEN }}
    config_timezone: America/New_York
    plugin_lines: yes
    plugin_isocalendar: yes

Summary

github-profile-views-counter is a straightforward tool for tracking GitHub profile views, offering simplicity and ease of use. However, it lacks the extensive features and customization options provided by metrics. metrics offers a comprehensive suite of GitHub statistics and visualizations, making it more suitable for users seeking detailed insights into their GitHub activity. The choice between the two depends on whether you need a simple view counter or a more robust metrics dashboard for your GitHub profile.

Pros of github-stats

• Simpler setup and configuration process
• Generates static SVG images for easy embedding
• Lightweight and focused on core GitHub statistics

Cons of github-stats

• Limited customization options compared to metrics
• Fewer data visualization types available
• Less frequent updates and smaller community support

Code Comparison

metrics:

- uses: lowlighter/metrics@latest
  with:
    token: ${{ secrets.METRICS_TOKEN }}
    config_timezone: America/New_York
    plugin_languages: yes
    plugin_languages_ignored: html, css

github-stats:

- uses: jstrieb/github-stats@v1
  with:
    TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    INCLUDE_ALL_COMMITS: true
    SHOW_LOC_CHART: true

Summary

metrics offers a more comprehensive and customizable solution for GitHub profile statistics, with a wide range of plugins and visualization options. It has a larger community and more frequent updates. However, it may require more setup and configuration.

github-stats provides a simpler, more straightforward approach to displaying GitHub statistics. It generates static SVG images that are easy to embed, but offers fewer customization options and data visualization types compared to metrics.

Both projects serve similar purposes, but cater to different user needs based on the desired level of complexity and customization.