Pros of awesome-android-ui

• Comprehensive collection of UI libraries and components
• Regularly updated with new contributions from the community
• Categorized for easy navigation and discovery

Cons of awesome-android-ui

• Not a standalone library, requires additional implementation
• May include outdated or deprecated libraries

Code comparison

android-ui:

RevealFrameLayout revealFrameLayout = new RevealFrameLayout(this);
CircularRevealWidget revealWidget = new CircularRevealWidget(this);
revealFrameLayout.addView(revealWidget);

awesome-android-ui: (No direct code comparison available as it's a curated list, not a library)

Summary

android-ui is a specific UI library focusing on reveal animations, while awesome-android-ui is a curated list of various Android UI libraries and components. android-ui provides a more focused set of tools for specific animations, whereas awesome-android-ui offers a broader range of UI resources but requires additional implementation effort. The choice between the two depends on whether you need a specific animation library or want to explore a variety of UI options for your Android project.

Pros of MaterialViewPager

• Offers a more comprehensive Material Design implementation with ViewPager integration
• Provides smooth parallax effects and header animations out of the box
• Includes built-in support for multiple view types (RecyclerView, ScrollView, WebView)

Cons of MaterialViewPager

• May have a steeper learning curve due to its more complex implementation
• Could be considered "heavier" in terms of resource usage compared to android-ui
• Less flexibility for customizing individual UI components

Code Comparison

MaterialViewPager:

<com.github.florent37.materialviewpager.MaterialViewPager
    android:id="@+id/materialViewPager"
    android:layout_width="match_parent"
    android:layout_height="match_parent"
    app:viewpager_logo="@layout/header_logo"
    app:viewpager_logoMarginTop="100dp"
    app:viewpager_color="@color/colorPrimary"
    app:viewpager_headerHeight="200dp"
    app:viewpager_headerAlpha="1.0"
    app:viewpager_hideLogoWithFade="false"
    app:viewpager_hideToolbarAndTitle="true"
    app:viewpager_enableToolbarElevation="true"
    app:viewpager_parallaxHeaderFactor="1.5"
    app:viewpager_headerAdditionalHeight="20dp"
    app:viewpager_displayToolbarWhenSwipe="true"
    app:viewpager_transparentToolbar="true"
    app:viewpager_animatedHeaderImage="true"
    app:viewpager_disableToolbar="false"/>

android-ui:

<com.markushi.ui.CircleButton
    android:layout_width="64dip"
    android:layout_height="64dip"
    android:src="@drawable/ic_action_new"
    app:cb_color="#99CC00"
    app:cb_pressedRingWidth="8dip" />

Pros of RippleEffect

• Offers more customization options for ripple effects
• Supports a wider range of Android versions (API 9+)
• Provides smoother animations and better performance

Cons of RippleEffect

• Less actively maintained (last update in 2015)
• Limited to ripple effects, while android-ui offers more UI components
• May require more setup and configuration

Code Comparison

RippleEffect:

RippleView rippleView = (RippleView) findViewById(R.id.ripple);
rippleView.setRippleColor(Color.parseColor("#ff0000"));
rippleView.setRippleDuration(1000);
rippleView.setRippleAlpha(0.2f);

android-ui:

RevealColorView revealColorView = (RevealColorView) findViewById(R.id.reveal);
revealColorView.reveal(centerX, centerY, color, radius, duration);

Both libraries aim to enhance Android UI elements, but RippleEffect focuses specifically on ripple animations, while android-ui provides a broader set of UI components and effects. RippleEffect offers more customization for ripples, but android-ui is more actively maintained and provides a wider range of UI enhancements.

Pros of MaterialDesignLibrary

• More comprehensive set of Material Design components
• Includes custom views like FloatingActionButton and SnackBar
• Better documentation and usage examples

Cons of MaterialDesignLibrary

• Less actively maintained (last update was several years ago)
• May not be fully compatible with the latest Android versions
• Larger library size, potentially increasing app size

Code Comparison

MaterialDesignLibrary:

<com.gc.materialdesign.views.ButtonRectangle
    android:id="@+id/button"
    android:layout_width="wrap_content"
    android:layout_height="wrap_content"
    android:background="#1E88E5"
    android:text="Button" />

android-ui:

<com.markushi.ui.ActionView
    android:id="@+id/action"
    android:layout_width="56dp"
    android:layout_height="56dp"
    app:av_color="@android:color/white"
    app:av_action="drawer" />

MaterialDesignLibrary offers a wider range of pre-built Material Design components, making it easier to implement complex UI elements. However, android-ui focuses on specific UI components and animations, providing a more lightweight solution for developers who need only certain features.

While MaterialDesignLibrary hasn't been updated recently, android-ui has also seen limited activity. Developers should consider their specific needs and the potential trade-offs between feature set and maintenance when choosing between these libraries.

Pros of material-dialogs

• More comprehensive and feature-rich library for creating Material Design dialogs
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and bug fixes
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons of material-dialogs

• Larger library size, potentially increasing app size
• Steeper learning curve due to more complex API

Code Comparison

material-dialogs:

MaterialDialog(this).show {
    title(R.string.dialog_title)
    message(R.string.dialog_message)
    positiveButton(R.string.agree)
    negativeButton(R.string.disagree)
}

android-ui:

new AlertDialog.Builder(this)
    .setTitle(R.string.dialog_title)
    .setMessage(R.string.dialog_message)
    .setPositiveButton(R.string.agree, null)
    .setNegativeButton(R.string.disagree, null)
    .show();

Summary

material-dialogs offers a more comprehensive solution for creating Material Design dialogs in Android applications, with active maintenance and extensive features. However, it comes with a larger library size and potentially more complex API. android-ui, while simpler, may lack some advanced features and recent updates. The choice between the two depends on the specific project requirements and the developer's preference for simplicity versus feature richness.

Pros of Context-Menu.Android

• More focused on a specific UI component (context menu)
• Provides a visually appealing and animated context menu implementation
• Actively maintained with recent updates

Cons of Context-Menu.Android

• Limited to context menu functionality
• May require more setup and customization for specific use cases

Code Comparison

Context-Menu.Android:

MenuObject close = new MenuObject();
close.setResource(R.drawable.icn_close);
menuObjects.add(close);

MenuParams menuParams = new MenuParams();
menuParams.setActionBarSize((int) getResources().getDimension(R.dimen.tool_bar_height));
menuParams.setMenuObjects(menuObjects);
menuParams.setClosableOutside(false);

android-ui:

RevealFrameLayout revealFrameLayout = new RevealFrameLayout(this);
CircularRevealWidget revealWidget = new CircularRevealWidget(this);
revealFrameLayout.addView(revealWidget);

Additional Considerations

• android-ui offers a broader range of UI components and animations
• Context-Menu.Android provides a more polished and ready-to-use context menu solution
• android-ui may be better suited for developers looking for general-purpose UI utilities
• Context-Menu.Android is ideal for projects specifically requiring an enhanced context menu

Both libraries have their merits, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your Android project.