Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem support
• Extensive internationalization features

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier and slower for smaller projects
• Less focus on rapid development compared to cool-admin-vue

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/redirect',
    component: Layout,
    hidden: true,
    children: [
      {
        path: '/redirect/:path(.*)',
        component: () => import('@/views/redirect/index')
      }
    ]
  }
]

cool-admin-vue:

import { createRouter, createWebHistory } from 'vue-router';
import { routerModules } from '/@/cool/modules';

export const routes = [
  {
    path: '/',
    name: 'layout',
    component: () => import('/@/layout/index.vue'),
    children: [...routerModules]
  }
];

The code comparison shows that vue-element-admin uses Vue Router 3.x syntax, while cool-admin-vue uses Vue Router 4.x syntax with the Composition API. cool-admin-vue's approach appears more concise and modular, potentially easier for rapid development.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Better TypeScript support and type definitions

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Less flexibility in customization compared to cool-admin-vue

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { BasicForm, useForm } from '/@/components/Form';
import { formSchema } from './data';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    const [registerForm, { setFieldsValue }] = useForm({
      schemas: formSchema,
    });
    // ... more code
  },
});

cool-admin-vue:

import { ref } from 'vue';
import { useForm } from '@cool-vue/crud';

export default {
  setup() {
    const form = ref(null);
    const { submit, reset } = useForm(form);
    // ... more code
  },
};

The code comparison shows that vue-vben-admin uses TypeScript and has a more structured approach to form handling, while cool-admin-vue uses a simpler JavaScript implementation. vue-vben-admin's code is more verbose but provides better type safety and intellisense support.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Includes additional features like multi-tab support and theme customization

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler applications
• Less flexibility for customization in certain areas

Code Comparison

cool-admin-vue:

<template>
  <cl-crud @load="onLoad">
    <cl-row>
      <cl-col>
        <cl-table v-bind="table" />
      </cl-col>
    </cl-row>
  </cl-crud>
</template>

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <vab-query-form>
      <!-- Query form fields -->
    </vab-query-form>
    <vab-query-table
      :data="list"
      :columns="columns"
      @selection-change="handleSelectionChange"
    />
  </div>
</template>

The code comparison shows that cool-admin-vue uses a more concise and declarative approach with its cl-crud component, while vue-admin-better provides more granular control over individual components like query forms and tables. This reflects the trade-off between simplicity and flexibility in the two projects.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to understand and customize
• Includes a variety of pre-built components and layouts for quick development
• Regularly updated with new features and bug fixes

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive than cool-admin-vue in terms of advanced features
• May require more manual configuration for complex enterprise applications
• Limited built-in support for backend integration compared to cool-admin-vue

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

<template>
    <div class="sidebar">
        <el-menu class="sidebar-el-menu" :default-active="onRoutes" :collapse="collapse" background-color="#324157"
            text-color="#bfcbd9" active-text-color="#20a0ff" unique-opened router>
            <template v-for="item in items">
                <template v-if="item.subs">
                    <el-submenu :index="item.index" :key="item.index">
                        <template #title>
                            <i :class="item.icon"></i><span>{{ item.title }}</span>
                        </template>
                        <template v-for="subItem in item.subs">
                            <el-submenu v-if="subItem.subs" :index="subItem.index" :key="subItem.index">
                                <template #title>{{ subItem.title }}</template>
                                <el-menu-item v-for="(threeItem,i) in subItem.subs" :key="i" :index="threeItem.index">
                                    {{ threeItem.title }}
                                </el-menu-item>
                            </el-submenu>
                            <el-menu-item v-else :index="subItem.index" :key="subItem.index">
                                {{ subItem.title }}
                            </el-menu-item>
                        </template>
                    </el-submenu>
                </template>
                <template v-else>
                    <el-menu-item :index="item.index" :key="item.index">
                        <i :class="item.icon"></i><span>{{ item.title }}</span>
                    </el-menu-item>
                </template>
            </template>
        </el-menu>
    </div>
</template>

cool-admin-vue:

<template>
	<div class="cl-menu">
		<el-menu
			:default-active="active"
			:collapse="app.isSidebarCollapse"
			:unique-opened="config.menu.uniqueOpened"
			:collapse-transition="false"
			:mode="mode"
			@select="onSelect"
		>
			<cl-menu-item
				v-for="(item, index) in list"
				:key="index"
				:item="item"
				:index="String(index)"
			/>
		</el-menu>
	</div>
</template>

Pros of iview-admin

• More mature and established project with a larger community
• Comprehensive documentation and examples
• Built on top of the popular iView UI component library

Cons of iview-admin

• Less frequent updates and maintenance
• Older technology stack (Vue 2.x)
• More complex setup and configuration

Code Comparison

iview-admin:

<template>
  <div class="layout">
    <Layout>
      <Sider hide-trigger :style="{background: '#fff'}">
        <Menu active-name="1" theme="light" width="auto" :open-names="['1']">
          <!-- Menu items -->
        </Menu>
      </Sider>
      <!-- Main content -->
    </Layout>
  </div>
</template>

cool-admin-vue:

<template>
  <cl-layout>
    <cl-menu-tree :data="menuList" />
    <cl-container>
      <router-view />
    </cl-container>
  </cl-layout>
</template>

The code comparison shows that cool-admin-vue uses custom components (cl-layout, cl-menu-tree, cl-container) for layout and menu structure, while iview-admin relies on iView's built-in components (Layout, Sider, Menu). cool-admin-vue's approach appears more streamlined and easier to use, while iview-admin offers more granular control over the layout structure.

Pros of Vuestic Admin

• More comprehensive UI component library with a wider range of pre-built elements
• Better documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started
• Active community support and regular updates

Cons of Vuestic Admin

• Larger bundle size due to the extensive component library
• Less flexibility in terms of customization compared to Cool Admin Vue
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to the framework

Code Comparison

Vuestic Admin component usage:

<va-card>
  <va-card-title>Card Title</va-card-title>
  <va-card-content>Card Content</va-card-content>
</va-card>

Cool Admin Vue component usage:

<cl-card>
  <template #title>Card Title</template>
  <template #default>Card Content</template>
</cl-card>

Both frameworks offer similar component structures, but Vuestic Admin tends to use more specific component names (e.g., va-card-title), while Cool Admin Vue relies more on slots for content organization.