Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a complete admin panel solution
• Better documentation and community support
• Regular updates and maintenance

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Heavier bundle size

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/redirect',
    component: Layout,
    hidden: true,
    children: [
      {
        path: '/redirect/:path(.*)',
        component: () => import('@/views/redirect/index')
      }
    ]
  }
]

vue-framework-wz:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

export default new Router({
  routes: [
    {
      path: '/',
      name: 'Hello',
      component: Hello
    }
  ]
})

The code comparison shows that vue-element-admin uses a more complex routing structure with nested routes and dynamic imports, while vue-framework-wz has a simpler routing setup. This reflects the overall difference in complexity and feature set between the two projects.

Pros of vue2-elm

• More comprehensive real-world application example (food delivery app)
• Larger community and more stars on GitHub
• Includes backend API implementation

Cons of vue2-elm

• Less focus on project structure and best practices
• Older project with potentially outdated dependencies
• Limited documentation and comments in English

Code Comparison

vue2-elm:

import Vue from 'vue'
import VueRouter from 'vue-router'
import routes from './router/router'
import store from './store/'
import {routerMode} from './config/env'
import './config/rem'
import FastClick from 'fastclick'

vue-framework-wz:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'
import ElementUI from 'element-ui'
import 'element-ui/lib/theme-default/index.css'

vue2-elm focuses on a specific application (food delivery), providing a more comprehensive example of a real-world Vue.js project. It includes both frontend and backend implementations, making it valuable for developers looking to understand full-stack Vue applications.

vue-framework-wz, on the other hand, emphasizes project structure and best practices. It provides a cleaner, more organized codebase that may be easier for beginners to understand and adapt to their own projects.

The code comparison shows that vue2-elm includes more configuration and utilities, such as FastClick and rem settings, while vue-framework-wz focuses on core Vue.js setup with ElementUI integration.

Both projects offer valuable learning resources for Vue.js developers, with vue2-elm providing a more complex, real-world example and vue-framework-wz offering a cleaner, more structured approach to Vue.js application development.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• More comprehensive documentation, including detailed setup instructions and feature explanations
• Regular updates and maintenance, with the latest commit more recent than vue-framework-wz
• Includes a wider range of pre-built components and layouts for rapid development

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less focus on performance optimization compared to vue-framework-wz
• Fewer custom directives and utilities for advanced Vue.js development
• Less emphasis on modular architecture and code organization

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

import Vue from 'vue';
import App from './App.vue';
import router from './router';
import ElementUI from 'element-ui';
import VueI18n from 'vue-i18n';
import { messages } from './components/common/i18n';

vue-framework-wz:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'
import * as filters from './filters'
import './directives'

The code comparison shows that vue-manage-system includes additional dependencies like ElementUI and VueI18n for internationalization, while vue-framework-wz focuses on custom filters and directives. This reflects the different priorities of each project, with vue-manage-system emphasizing ready-to-use components and vue-framework-wz prioritizing customization and performance.

Pros of iview-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better documentation and community support
• Regular updates and maintenance

Cons of iview-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex structure
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler projects

Code Comparison

vue-framework-wz:

<template>
  <div class="app-wrapper" :class="{hideSidebar:!sidebar.opened}">
    <div class="sidebar-wrapper">
      <sidebar class="sidebar-container"></sidebar>
    </div>
    <div class="main-container">
      <navbar></navbar>
      <app-main></app-main>
    </div>
  </div>
</template>

iview-admin:

<template>
    <Layout style="height: 100%" class="main">
        <Sider hide-trigger collapsible :width="256" :collapsed-width="64" v-model="collapsed" class="left-sider" :style="{overflow: 'hidden'}">
            <side-menu accordion ref="sideMenu" :active-name="$route.name" :collapsed="collapsed" @on-select="turnToPage" :menu-list="menuList">
                <!-- 需要放在菜单上面的内容，如Logo，写在side-menu标签内部，如下 -->
                <div class="logo-con">
                    <img v-show="!collapsed" :src="maxLogo" key="max-logo" />
                    <img v-show="collapsed" :src="minLogo" key="min-logo" />
                </div>
            </side-menu>
        </Sider>
        <Layout>
            <Header class="header-con">
                <header-bar :collapsed="collapsed" @on-coll-change="handleCollapsedChange">
                    <user :message-unread-count="unreadCount" :user-avator="userAvator"/>
                    <language v-if="$config.useI18n" @on-lang-change="setLocal" style="margin-right: 10px;" :lang="local"/>
                    <error-store v-if="$config.plugin['error-store'] && $config.plugin['error-store'].showInHeader" :has-read="hasReadErrorPage" :count="errorCount"></error-store>
                    <fullscreen v-model="isFullscreen" style="margin-right: 10px;"/>
                </header-bar>
            </Header>
            <Content class="main-content-con">
                <Layout class="main-layout-con">
                    <div class="tag-nav-wrapper">
                        <tags-nav :value="$route" @input="handleClick" :list="tagNavList" @on-close="handleCloseTag"/>
                    </div>
                    <Content class="content-wrapper">
                        <keep-alive :include="cacheList">
                            <router-view/>
                        </keep-alive>
                        <ABackTop :height="100" :bottom="80" :right="50" container=".content-wrapper"></ABackTop>
                    </Content>
                </Layout>
            </Content>
        </Layout>
    </Layout>
</template>

The code comparison shows that iview-admin has a more complex and feature-rich structure, while vue-framework-wz has a simpler layout. This reflects the overall difference in complexity and feature set between the two projects.

Pros of ant-design-vue-pro

• More comprehensive UI components and layouts based on Ant Design Vue
• Better documentation and examples for enterprise-level applications
• Active development and maintenance with frequent updates

Cons of ant-design-vue-pro

• Larger bundle size due to the inclusion of Ant Design Vue components
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Ant Design
• Less flexibility for customization compared to a lightweight framework

Code Comparison

vue-framework-wz:

<template>
  <div class="app-container">
    <div class="filter-container">
      <!-- Custom filter components -->
    </div>
    <!-- Custom table implementation -->
  </div>
</template>

ant-design-vue-pro:

<template>
  <a-card :bordered="false">
    <a-table
      :columns="columns"
      :dataSource="data"
      :loading="loading"
      :pagination="pagination"
    />
  </a-card>
</template>

The code comparison shows that ant-design-vue-pro utilizes pre-built Ant Design Vue components, such as a-card and a-table, while vue-framework-wz relies more on custom implementations. This demonstrates the trade-off between ease of use and flexibility in the two frameworks.

Pros of vuestic-admin

• More comprehensive UI component library with a wider range of pre-built elements
• Better documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started
• More active development and community support, with frequent updates and bug fixes

Cons of vuestic-admin

• Larger file size and potentially slower initial load times due to the extensive component library
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Vue.js or complex admin dashboards
• Less flexibility for customization compared to vue-framework-wz's more minimalist approach

Code Comparison

vuestic-admin:

<va-card>
  <va-card-title>{{ title }}</va-card-title>
  <va-card-content>{{ content }}</va-card-content>
</va-card>

vue-framework-wz:

<el-card class="box-card">
  <div slot="header" class="clearfix">
    <span>{{ title }}</span>
  </div>
  <div class="text item">{{ content }}</div>
</el-card>

The code comparison shows that vuestic-admin uses custom components (va-card) with a more straightforward structure, while vue-framework-wz relies on Element UI components (el-card) with additional wrapper elements.