Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Larger community and better documentation
• Includes advanced features like permission control and i18n support

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Heavier bundle size due to numerous features

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import permission from './permission'
import element from './element'
import settings from './settings'

Vue.use(permission)
Vue.use(element, { size: settings.elementSize })

xyy-vue:

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'

Vue.config.productionTip = false

The code snippets show that vue-element-admin includes more advanced features like permission handling and custom element settings, while xyy-vue has a simpler setup focused on core Vue.js functionality.

vue-element-admin is better suited for large-scale applications requiring extensive admin features, while xyy-vue might be more appropriate for smaller projects or those needing a lightweight starting point. The choice between them depends on the project's specific requirements and complexity.

Pros of vue2-elm

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a full-fledged food delivery application
• Extensive documentation and detailed README, making it easier for developers to understand and contribute
• Larger community and more active development, with frequent updates and bug fixes

Cons of vue2-elm

• Larger codebase and more complex structure, which may be overwhelming for beginners
• Focused on a specific use case (food delivery), making it less flexible for other types of projects
• Heavier dependencies and potentially slower performance due to its extensive features

Code Comparison

vue2-elm:

<template>
  <div>
    <header-top :head-title="cityname" go-back='true'>
      <router-link to="/home" slot="changecity" class="change-city">切换城市</router-link>
    </header-top>
    <form class="city-form" v-on:submit.prevent>
      <div>
        <input type="search" name="city" placeholder="输入学校、商务楼、地址" class="city-input input-style" required v-model='inputVaule'>
      </div>
    </form>
  </div>
</template>

xyy-vue:

<template>
  <div class="search">
    <div class="search-box">
      <i class="icon-search"></i>
      <input v-model="query" class="box" :placeholder="placeholder" @keyup.enter="onSubmit">
    </div>
  </div>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue2-elm has a more complex template structure with additional components and routing, while xyy-vue has a simpler, more focused search component.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better documentation and examples for various components
• Active development with frequent updates and bug fixes

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Larger codebase, potentially more complex for beginners
• Heavier dependencies, which may impact performance
• Less focused on specific use cases, more general-purpose

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

<template>
  <div class="sidebar">
    <el-menu class="sidebar-el-menu" :default-active="onRoutes" :collapse="collapse" background-color="#324157"
      text-color="#bfcbd9" active-text-color="#20a0ff" unique-opened router>
      <template v-for="item in items">
        <template v-if="item.subs">

xyy-vue:

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <router-view></router-view>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  name: 'App'
}
</script>

The code comparison shows that vue-manage-system has a more complex sidebar component with various configuration options, while xyy-vue has a simpler app structure. This reflects the overall difference in complexity and feature set between the two projects.

Pros of iview-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better documentation and community support
• Includes advanced components like charts and tables

Cons of iview-admin

• Larger codebase, potentially more complex to customize
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• May include unnecessary features for simpler projects

Code Comparison

xyy-vue (main.js):

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'

Vue.config.productionTip = false

iview-admin (main.js):

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'
import iView from 'iview'
import i18n from '@/locale'
import config from '@/config'

Vue.use(iView, {
  i18n: (key, value) => i18n.t(key, value)
})

The iview-admin main.js file includes additional imports for iView components and internationalization, showcasing its more feature-rich nature. xyy-vue has a simpler setup, which may be easier for beginners to understand and customize.

Pros of ant-design-vue-pro

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a complete admin dashboard solution
• Better documentation and community support
• Regularly updated with new features and bug fixes

Cons of ant-design-vue-pro

• Larger codebase, which may be overwhelming for simpler projects
• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• More opinionated structure, potentially limiting flexibility for custom implementations

Code Comparison

ant-design-vue-pro:

<template>
  <a-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <div id="app">
      <router-view/>
    </div>
  </a-config-provider>
</template>

xyy-vue:

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <router-view></router-view>
  </div>
</template>

The code comparison shows that ant-design-vue-pro uses the Ant Design Vue configuration provider for internationalization, while xyy-vue has a simpler structure. This reflects the more comprehensive nature of ant-design-vue-pro and its focus on providing a complete solution with built-in features like internationalization support.

Pros of element

• Much larger community and user base, with over 50k GitHub stars
• Comprehensive documentation and extensive component library
• Regular updates and maintenance from a dedicated team

Cons of element

• Larger file size and potential performance overhead
• Steeper learning curve due to the extensive API and options
• Less flexibility for customization compared to smaller libraries

Code Comparison

element:

<el-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">
  Click me
</el-button>

xyy-vue:

<x-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">
  Click me
</x-button>

Summary

element is a more mature and feature-rich UI library for Vue.js, offering a wide range of components and extensive documentation. It's well-suited for large-scale applications and teams that require a comprehensive solution. However, this comes at the cost of a larger file size and potentially more complex implementation.

xyy-vue, on the other hand, is a smaller and more lightweight library. It may offer more flexibility for customization and a gentler learning curve, but lacks the extensive component library and community support of element.

The code comparison shows that both libraries use similar syntax for basic components, making it relatively easy to switch between them if needed.