Pros of vue-element-admin

• More mature and widely adopted project with a larger community
• Extensive documentation and examples available
• Comprehensive set of pre-built components and features

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Based on Vue 2, which may become outdated as Vue 3 gains popularity
• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier and more complex for simpler projects

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin (Vue 2):

import Vue from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'

Vue.config.productionTip = false

new Vue({
  router,
  store,
  render: h => h(App)
}).$mount('#app')

vue3-admin (Vue 3):

import { createApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'
import router from './router'
import store from './store'

createApp(App).use(router).use(store).mount('#app')

The main difference in the code snippets is the use of Vue 3's composition API in vue3-admin, which provides a more concise way to create and configure the Vue application. vue-element-admin uses the Vue 2 syntax, which is more verbose but still widely used and supported.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Wider range of pre-built components and layouts
• Active community support and regular updates

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• Potentially heavier bundle size with additional features
• May require more configuration for simpler projects

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <vab-layout>
    <vab-sidebar />
    <vab-main>
      <router-view />
    </vab-main>
  </vab-layout>
</template>

vue3-admin:

<template>
  <el-container>
    <el-aside>
      <sidebar />
    </el-aside>
    <el-main>
      <router-view />
    </el-main>
  </el-container>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses custom components for layout structure, while vue3-admin relies more on Element Plus components. This reflects vue-admin-better's more customized approach, which can offer greater flexibility but may require more familiarity with the project's specific components.

Both projects provide solid foundations for building Vue.js admin interfaces, with vue-admin-better offering more features and customization options at the cost of increased complexity, while vue3-admin provides a simpler, more straightforward approach that may be easier for beginners to grasp and implement quickly.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wider range of components and utilities
• Better TypeScript support and integration
• More active development and frequent updates

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity and extensive features
• Potentially heavier and more resource-intensive for smaller projects
• May require more configuration and customization for specific use cases

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { BasicForm, useForm } from '/@/components/Form';
import { BasicTable, useTable } from '/@/components/Table';
import { getBasicColumns, getFormConfig } from './tableData';

export default defineComponent({
  // ... component logic
});

vue3-admin:

<template>
  <div class="table-container">
    <el-table :data="tableData" style="width: 100%">
      <el-table-column prop="date" label="Date" width="180" />
      <el-table-column prop="name" label="Name" width="180" />
      <el-table-column prop="address" label="Address" />
    </el-table>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
// ... component logic
</script>

The code comparison shows that vue-vben-admin uses more advanced TypeScript features and custom components, while vue3-admin relies on simpler Vue 3 template syntax and Element Plus components. vue-vben-admin's approach offers more flexibility and type safety, but may require more setup and understanding of the framework.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• More comprehensive documentation, including detailed setup instructions and feature explanations
• Wider range of UI components and layouts, offering greater flexibility for developers
• Active community support with regular updates and issue resolutions

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Uses Vue 2, which may be considered outdated compared to Vue 3 used in vue3-admin
• Larger bundle size due to inclusion of more features and dependencies
• Steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive feature set

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system (Vue 2):

import Vue from 'vue';
import App from './App.vue';
import router from './router';
import store from './store';

Vue.config.productionTip = false;

new Vue({
  router,
  store,
  render: h => h(App)
}).$mount('#app');

vue3-admin (Vue 3):

import { createApp } from 'vue';
import App from './App.vue';
import router from './router';
import store from './store';

const app = createApp(App);
app.use(router);
app.use(store);
app.mount('#app');

The main difference in the code snippets is the setup process, reflecting the transition from Vue 2 to Vue 3. vue3-admin uses the new createApp function, while vue-manage-system uses the Vue 2 constructor.

Pros of vue2-manage

• Built with Vue 2, which has a larger ecosystem and more established best practices
• Includes a wider range of pre-built components and features
• More comprehensive documentation and examples

Cons of vue2-manage

• Uses older Vue 2 syntax, which may become outdated as Vue 3 gains adoption
• Less performant compared to Vue 3's improved reactivity system
• May lack some of the newer features and improvements introduced in Vue 3

Code Comparison

vue2-manage (Vue 2 syntax):

export default {
  data() {
    return {
      message: 'Hello Vue 2'
    }
  },
  methods: {
    greet() {
      console.log(this.message)
    }
  }
}

vue3-admin (Vue 3 Composition API):

import { ref } from 'vue'

export default {
  setup() {
    const message = ref('Hello Vue 3')
    const greet = () => {
      console.log(message.value)
    }
    return { message, greet }
  }
}

The main difference in the code examples is the use of the Composition API in vue3-admin, which offers a more flexible and reusable approach to organizing component logic compared to the Options API used in vue2-manage.

Pros of naive-ui-admin

• Uses Naive UI, a Vue 3 component library with a modern design and extensive customization options
• Implements a more comprehensive role-based access control system
• Offers a wider range of pre-built components and layouts

Cons of naive-ui-admin

• Less focused on e-commerce specific features compared to vue3-admin
• May have a steeper learning curve due to its more complex architecture
• Smaller community and potentially less frequent updates

Code Comparison

naive-ui-admin uses the Naive UI component library:

<template>
  <n-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">
    Click me
  </n-button>
</template>

vue3-admin uses Element Plus components:

<template>
  <el-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">
    Click me
  </el-button>
</template>

Both projects use Vue 3 and TypeScript, but naive-ui-admin tends to have more complex component structures and state management implementations. vue3-admin focuses more on simplicity and ease of use for e-commerce applications, while naive-ui-admin provides a more general-purpose admin template with advanced features and customization options.