Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and ecosystem
• Extensive internationalization support

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Heavier and more complex, potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Less frequent updates compared to vue-pure-admin
• Steeper learning curve for beginners

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import { mapGetters } from 'vuex'

export default {
  computed: {
    ...mapGetters([
      'sidebar',
      'device',
      'visitedViews',
      'cachedViews'
    ])
  }
}

vue-pure-admin:

import { useAppStore } from '@/store/modules/app'

export default {
  setup() {
    const appStore = useAppStore()
    return {
      sidebar: computed(() => appStore.sidebar),
      device: computed(() => appStore.device)
    }
  }
}

The code comparison shows that vue-element-admin uses Vuex with mapGetters for state management, while vue-pure-admin employs the Composition API with Pinia for a more modern approach. vue-pure-admin's code is generally more concise and easier to read, especially for developers familiar with the Composition API.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Better internationalization support

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• Heavier bundle size, which may impact performance
• Less flexibility for customization compared to vue-pure-admin

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <el-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <router-view />
  </el-config-provider>
</template>

vue-pure-admin:

<template>
  <router-view v-slot="{ Component, route }">
    <transition :name="getTransitionName(route)" mode="out-in">
      <keep-alive v-if="keepAliveComponents" :include="keepAliveComponents">
        <component :is="Component" :key="route.fullPath" />
      </keep-alive>
      <component v-else :is="Component" :key="route.fullPath" />
    </transition>
  </router-view>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses a simpler approach with el-config-provider for internationalization, while vue-pure-admin implements more advanced routing features like transitions and keep-alive components. This reflects the trade-off between ease of use and flexibility in the two projects.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Better internationalization support

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to complexity
• Heavier bundle size
• More opinionated structure, potentially less flexible

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin:

import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { BasicForm, useForm } from '/@/components/Form';
import { formSchema } from './data';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    const [registerForm, { setFieldsValue }] = useForm({
      schemas: formSchema,
    });
    // ... more code
  },
});

vue-pure-admin:

import { defineComponent, reactive } from 'vue';
import { ElForm } from 'element-plus';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    const form = reactive({
      name: '',
      email: '',
    });
    // ... more code
  },
});

The code comparison shows that vue-vben-admin uses a more abstracted approach with custom hooks and schemas, while vue-pure-admin opts for a simpler, more direct implementation using Vue 3's Composition API and Element Plus components.

Pros of naive-ui-admin

• Built on Naive UI, offering a rich set of customizable components
• Includes a comprehensive permission management system
• Provides a more modern and sleek user interface design

Cons of naive-ui-admin

• Less extensive documentation compared to vue-pure-admin
• Smaller community and fewer contributors
• May have a steeper learning curve for developers new to Naive UI

Code Comparison

naive-ui-admin:

<template>
  <n-config-provider :theme="theme">
    <n-layout>
      <!-- Layout content -->
    </n-layout>
  </n-config-provider>
</template>

vue-pure-admin:

<template>
  <el-config-provider :locale="locale">
    <router-view />
  </el-config-provider>
</template>

The code snippets show that naive-ui-admin uses Naive UI components (n-config-provider, n-layout) while vue-pure-admin uses Element Plus components (el-config-provider). This reflects the different UI libraries each project is built upon.

Both projects offer robust admin template solutions for Vue.js applications, with vue-pure-admin having a larger community and more extensive documentation, while naive-ui-admin provides a modern interface and comprehensive permission management system. The choice between the two would depend on specific project requirements and developer preferences.

Pros of soybean-admin

• More comprehensive documentation, including detailed setup instructions and component usage guides
• Stronger focus on TypeScript integration, providing better type safety and developer experience
• Includes built-in internationalization support, making it easier to create multilingual applications

Cons of soybean-admin

• Slightly steeper learning curve due to its more complex architecture and feature set
• May have more overhead for smaller projects that don't require all the included features
• Less frequent updates compared to vue-pure-admin

Code Comparison

soybean-admin:

import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { NLayout, NLayoutSider, NLayoutContent } from 'naive-ui';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    // Component logic
  }
});

vue-pure-admin:

<template>
  <el-container>
    <el-aside width="200px"><!-- Sidebar content --></el-aside>
    <el-main><!-- Main content --></el-main>
  </el-container>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  // Component logic
}
</script>

The code comparison shows that soybean-admin uses Naive UI components and TypeScript, while vue-pure-admin uses Element Plus components and Vue's Options API. This reflects soybean-admin's focus on TypeScript integration and a different UI library choice.

Pros of vue-manage-system

• Simpler and more lightweight, making it easier to understand and customize
• Includes a variety of pre-built components and layouts for quick development
• Well-documented with clear examples and usage instructions

Cons of vue-manage-system

• Less comprehensive feature set compared to vue-pure-admin
• May require more manual configuration for advanced functionalities
• Limited built-in themes and styling options

Code Comparison

vue-manage-system:

<template>
  <div class="sidebar">
    <el-menu class="sidebar-el-menu" :default-active="onRoutes" :collapse="collapse" background-color="#324157"
      text-color="#bfcbd9" active-text-color="#20a0ff" unique-opened router>
      <template v-for="item in items">
        <template v-if="item.subs">

vue-pure-admin:

<template>
  <el-menu
    :default-active="activeMenu"
    :collapse="getCollapse"
    :unique-opened="getUniqueOpened"
    :collapse-transition="false"
    :background-color="menuBgColor"
    :text-color="menuTextColor"
    :active-text-color="menuActiveTextColor"
  >
    <sidebar-item

Both repositories offer Vue-based admin templates, but vue-pure-admin provides a more feature-rich and customizable solution, while vue-manage-system focuses on simplicity and ease of use. The code comparison shows differences in menu implementation, with vue-pure-admin offering more configuration options.