d2-admin

Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Larger community and more frequent updates
• Wider range of pre-built components and layouts

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for smaller projects
• More opinionated structure, which may limit flexibility

Code Comparison

vue-element-admin:

import Layout from '@/layout'

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/redirect',
    component: Layout,
    hidden: true,
    children: [
      {
        path: '/redirect/:path(.*)',
        component: () => import('@/views/redirect/index')
      }
    ]
  },
  // ...
]

d2-admin:

import layoutHeaderAside from '@/layout/header-aside'

const meta = { auth: true }

export default {
  path: '/demo',
  name: 'demo',
  meta,
  redirect: { name: 'demo-page1' },
  component: layoutHeaderAside,
  children: [
    { path: 'page1', name: 'demo-page1', component: _import('demo/page1'), meta: { ...meta, title: '页面 1' } },
    { path: 'page2', name: 'demo-page2', component: _import('demo/page2'), meta: { ...meta, title: '页面 2' } },
    { path: 'page3', name: 'demo-page3', component: _import('demo/page3'), meta: { ...meta, title: '页面 3' } }
  ]
}

Both projects use Vue.js and Element UI, but vue-element-admin offers a more extensive set of features and components out of the box. d2-admin, on the other hand, provides a simpler structure that may be easier to customize for specific needs.

Pros of Vuestic-admin

• More comprehensive UI component library with a wider range of pre-built elements
• Better documentation and examples for developers
• More active community and frequent updates

Cons of Vuestic-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set
• Potentially heavier and slower performance compared to D2-admin
• Less flexibility for customization in some areas

Code Comparison

Vuestic-admin component usage:

<va-button color="primary" @click="handleClick">
  Click me
</va-button>

D2-admin component usage:

<d2-button type="primary" @click="handleClick">
  Click me
</d2-button>

Both projects use Vue.js and provide admin dashboard templates, but their approach to component implementation differs slightly. Vuestic-admin uses a va- prefix for its components, while D2-admin uses a d2- prefix. The syntax for props and event handling is similar in both cases.

Vuestic-admin tends to offer more customization options through props, while D2-admin focuses on simplicity and ease of use. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project, with Vuestic-admin being more suitable for complex applications and D2-admin for simpler, lightweight admin interfaces.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Includes built-in support for multiple languages
• Offers a wider range of pre-built components and layouts

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Larger bundle size due to more features and dependencies
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less flexibility for customization compared to d2-admin

Code Comparison

vue-admin-better:

import { createI18n } from 'vue-i18n'
import { getLanguage } from '@/utils/cookies'
import elementEnLocale from 'element-plus/lib/locale/lang/en'
import elementZhLocale from 'element-plus/lib/locale/lang/zh-cn'
import enLocale from './en'
import zhLocale from './zh-cn'

d2-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import VueI18n from 'vue-i18n'
import util from '@/libs/util'
import setting from '@/setting'

Vue.use(VueI18n)

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses the newer Composition API and has built-in support for multiple languages, including Element Plus locales. d2-admin, on the other hand, uses the Options API and requires more manual setup for internationalization.

Both projects are Vue-based admin templates, but vue-admin-better offers more out-of-the-box features and a more modern approach. However, d2-admin may be more suitable for developers who prefer a lighter, more customizable starting point.

Pros of iview-admin

• Built on iView UI components, offering a rich set of pre-designed elements
• Comprehensive documentation and examples for easy implementation
• Includes multiple theme options and customizable layouts

Cons of iview-admin

• Less frequent updates compared to d2-admin
• Steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with iView
• More opinionated structure, which may limit flexibility in some cases

Code Comparison

iview-admin:

<template>
  <div class="layout">
    <Layout>
      <Sider hide-trigger :style="{background: '#fff'}">
        <Menu active-name="1" theme="light" width="auto" :open-names="['1']">
          <!-- Menu items -->
        </Menu>
      </Sider>
      <!-- Main content -->
    </Layout>
  </div>
</template>

d2-admin:

<template>
  <d2-container>
    <template slot="header">Header</template>
    <router-view/>
    <template slot="footer">Footer</template>
  </d2-container>
</template>

Both projects offer robust admin panel solutions, but they cater to different preferences. iview-admin provides a more structured approach with its iView component library, while d2-admin offers greater flexibility and a potentially gentler learning curve for Vue developers. The choice between the two depends on project requirements and team familiarity with the respective ecosystems.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• Built with Vue 3 and TypeScript, offering better performance and type safety
• Includes a rich set of pre-built components and layouts for rapid development
• Supports dark mode and internationalization out of the box

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and TypeScript usage
• Larger bundle size, which may impact initial load times
• More opinionated structure, potentially limiting flexibility for some projects

Code Comparison

vue-vben-admin (using Composition API):

<script lang="ts">
import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { useUserStore } from '/@/store/modules/user';

export default defineComponent({
  setup() {
    const userStore = useUserStore();
    // ...
  },
});
</script>

d2-admin (using Options API):

<script>
export default {
  data() {
    return {
      // ...
    };
  },
  methods: {
    // ...
  },
};
</script>

Both projects are Vue-based admin templates, but vue-vben-admin leverages newer Vue 3 features and TypeScript, while d2-admin uses the traditional Vue 2 approach. vue-vben-admin offers more built-in features and components, making it suitable for complex projects, whereas d2-admin provides a simpler starting point for basic admin interfaces.

Pros of vue-antd-admin

• Built on Ant Design Vue, offering a comprehensive set of UI components
• Includes a robust permission management system
• Provides multi-language support out of the box

Cons of vue-antd-admin

• Less customizable theme options compared to d2-admin
• Steeper learning curve due to Ant Design Vue specifics
• Fewer pre-built layouts and page templates

Code Comparison

d2-admin:

import { mapState } from 'vuex'
export default {
  computed: {
    ...mapState('d2admin/menu', ['header'])
  }
}

vue-antd-admin:

import { mapGetters } from 'vuex'
export default {
  computed: {
    ...mapGetters(['userInfo', 'permissions'])
  }
}

Both projects use Vuex for state management, but vue-antd-admin tends to use getters more frequently, while d2-admin often directly maps state. vue-antd-admin's approach can provide more flexibility in data access and manipulation.

d2-admin focuses on providing a highly customizable admin template with a variety of themes and layouts. It offers a plugin system for easy extension and a comprehensive set of UI components.

vue-antd-admin, built on Ant Design Vue, provides a more opinionated structure with robust permission management and multi-language support. It's well-suited for projects requiring complex data presentation and user management.