Vue-Admin

Pros of vue-element-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich, offering a wide range of pre-built components and layouts
• Actively maintained with frequent updates and a large community of contributors
• Extensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to get started

Cons of vue-element-admin

• Larger codebase and more complex structure, which may be overwhelming for simpler projects
• Higher learning curve due to the extensive features and customization options
• Potentially slower initial load times due to the inclusion of many components

Code Comparison

Vue-Admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'
import Hello from '@/components/Hello'

Vue.use(Router)

export default new Router({
  routes: [
    {
      path: '/',
      name: 'Hello',
      component: Hello
    }
  ]
})

vue-element-admin:

import Vue from 'vue'
import Router from 'vue-router'

Vue.use(Router)

import Layout from '@/layout'

export const constantRoutes = [
  {
    path: '/redirect',
    component: Layout,
    hidden: true,
    children: [
      {
        path: '/redirect/:path(.*)',
        component: () => import('@/views/redirect/index')
      }
    ]
  }
]

The code comparison shows that vue-element-admin has a more complex routing structure with nested routes and dynamic imports, while Vue-Admin has a simpler approach to routing.

Pros of vuestic-admin

• More comprehensive UI components and pre-built pages
• Better documentation and community support
• Regular updates and active maintenance

Cons of vuestic-admin

• Larger bundle size due to more features
• Steeper learning curve for beginners
• Less flexibility for customization compared to Vue-Admin

Code Comparison

vuestic-admin:

<va-card>
  <va-card-title>{{ title }}</va-card-title>
  <va-card-content>{{ content }}</va-card-content>
</va-card>

Vue-Admin:

<el-card>
  <div slot="header">{{ title }}</div>
  <div>{{ content }}</div>
</el-card>

The code comparison shows that vuestic-admin uses custom components (va-card), while Vue-Admin relies on Element UI components (el-card). This reflects the different approaches of the two projects, with vuestic-admin offering a more tailored solution and Vue-Admin providing a more flexible foundation.

Both projects serve as Vue.js admin templates, but vuestic-admin offers a more feature-rich and polished experience out of the box. Vue-Admin, on the other hand, provides a simpler starting point that may be easier to customize for specific needs. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements, development team expertise, and desired level of customization.

Pros of vue-admin-better

• More active development with recent updates and commits
• Larger community with more stars and forks on GitHub
• Comprehensive documentation and examples available

Cons of vue-admin-better

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex features
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler projects
• May require more configuration and setup time

Code Comparison

Vue-Admin:

<template>
  <div class="app-wrapper">
    <sidebar class="sidebar-container"></sidebar>
    <div class="main-container">
      <navbar></navbar>
      <app-main></app-main>
    </div>
  </div>
</template>

vue-admin-better:

<template>
  <el-container class="layout-container-demo">
    <el-aside width="200px">
      <el-menu :default-openeds="['1', '3']">
        <!-- Menu items -->
      </el-menu>
    </el-aside>
    <el-container>
      <el-header style="text-align: right; font-size: 12px">
        <!-- Header content -->
      </el-header>
      <el-main>
        <!-- Main content -->
      </el-main>
    </el-container>
  </el-container>
</template>

The code comparison shows that vue-admin-better uses Element UI components more extensively, providing a more structured and feature-rich layout out of the box. Vue-Admin, on the other hand, has a simpler structure that may be easier to customize for specific needs.

Pros of iview-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better documentation and community support
• Regular updates and maintenance

Cons of iview-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially heavier and slower performance for simpler projects

Code Comparison

Vue-Admin:

<template>
  <div class="layout">
    <Layout>
      <Sider :style="{position: 'fixed', height: '100vh', left: 0, overflow: 'auto'}">
        <!-- Sider content -->
      </Sider>
      <!-- Main content -->
    </Layout>
  </div>
</template>

iview-admin:

<template>
  <Layout class="main" :class="{'hide-text': spanLeft < 5}">
    <Sider :width="spanLeft > 0 ? 200 : 60" :style="{background: '#fff'}">
      <side-menu :active-name="$route.name" :collapsed="spanLeft < 5" @on-select="turnToPage"></side-menu>
    </Sider>
    <!-- Main content -->
  </Layout>
</template>

The code comparison shows that iview-admin uses more advanced features and components, such as dynamic sider width and a custom side-menu component. Vue-Admin, on the other hand, has a simpler structure, which may be easier to understand and customize for beginners.

Pros of d2-admin

• More comprehensive documentation and examples
• Active development with frequent updates
• Larger community and ecosystem

Cons of d2-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to more complex architecture
• Potentially heavier and slower for simpler projects

Code Comparison

Vue-Admin:

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <router-view></router-view>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  name: 'App'
}
</script>

d2-admin:

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <router-view/>
    <d2-error-log-box/>
  </div>
</template>

<script>
import d2ErrorLogBox from './components/d2-error-log-box'
export default {
  name: 'App',
  components: { d2ErrorLogBox }
}
</script>

The code comparison shows that d2-admin includes additional components like error logging out of the box, which can be beneficial for larger projects but may be unnecessary for simpler applications.

Both projects provide solid foundations for building Vue.js admin interfaces, with d2-admin offering more features and complexity, while Vue-Admin focuses on simplicity and ease of use. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements of your project and your team's expertise with Vue.js.

Pros of vue-vben-admin

• More comprehensive and feature-rich admin template
• Better TypeScript support and integration
• Actively maintained with frequent updates

Cons of vue-vben-admin

• Steeper learning curve due to its complexity
• Potentially overkill for smaller projects
• Heavier bundle size

Code Comparison

Vue-Admin (using Vue 2):

<template>
  <div id="app">
    <!-- Basic layout structure -->
  </div>
</template>

<script>
export default {
  name: 'App'
}
</script>

vue-vben-admin (using Vue 3 and TypeScript):

<template>
  <ConfigProvider :locale="getAntdLocale">
    <AppProvider>
      <RouterView />
    </AppProvider>
  </ConfigProvider>
</template>

<script lang="ts">
import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
import { AppProvider } from '/@/components/Application';
import { ConfigProvider } from 'ant-design-vue';
import { useLocale } from '/@/locales/useLocale';

export default defineComponent({
  name: 'App',
  components: { AppProvider, ConfigProvider },
  setup() {
    const { getAntdLocale } = useLocale();
    return { getAntdLocale };
  },
});
</script>

The code comparison shows that vue-vben-admin uses Vue 3 with TypeScript, offering more advanced features and type safety. It also incorporates additional components like ConfigProvider and AppProvider, demonstrating its more comprehensive approach to building admin interfaces.